|
Author
|
Topic: The Science in Creationism
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
|
Message 4 of 986 (783080)
05-03-2016 6:54 AM
|
|
|
Falsification
Dawn, would you mind giving me say 3 examples of things that would falsify your belief in the Biblical version of YEC and also 3 things that would falsify the Ussher chronology world wide flood? (assuming you believe in those) Thanks JB
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
Re: Falsification
If you have previously listed things that would falsify YEC and a Noahic flood, could you please copy them into this thread. If you have not previously listed such things, could you please list them in this thread. Thanks JB
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 7 by Dawn Bertot, posted 05-03-2016 7:30 PM | | Dawn Bertot has replied |
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
|
|
Message 10 of 986 (783128)
05-03-2016 8:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 9 by Genomicus
05-03-2016 7:57 PM
|
|
Re: Falsification
quote:
The Biblical model is a very specific version of events; so how would it be falsified? If it's not falsifiable, then it's not really science.
This. Dawn doesn't get to decide the tenets of science -- falsifiability being one of them. Scientific theories are falsifiable -- period.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 9 by Genomicus, posted 05-03-2016 7:57 PM | | Genomicus has seen this message but not replied |
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
Re: Falsification
YOUR topic here is clearly titled "The Science in Creationism". One tenet of science is "falsifiablity". Thus I am asking for the falsifiability of Creationism (and the flood) It's your OP, not mine. You have clearly imposed science on creationism so answer the question please. JB
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
(2)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Falsification
quote:
I'm telling you plainly there is no potential in falsifying creation ...
Then it is not science. QED JB Edited by ThinAirDesigns, : No reason given.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 21 by Dawn Bertot, posted 05-03-2016 8:57 PM | | ThinAirDesigns has not replied |
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
Re: Falsification
No, I will not answer questions that are not on the topic of "The Science In Creationism". Start another thread if you wish to discuss such (but not with me). JB Edited by ThinAirDesigns, : No reason given.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 20 by Dawn Bertot, posted 05-03-2016 8:55 PM | | Dawn Bertot has not replied |
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
|
|
Message 391 of 986 (783749)
05-08-2016 11:15 AM
|
|
|
WHAT??
Why is someone who started a "The Science in Creationism" thread filling it with constant requests for the science in evolution? Give us what you promised please. JB
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 393 by jar, posted 05-08-2016 11:32 AM | | ThinAirDesigns has not replied |
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
|
|
Message 517 of 986 (783943)
05-10-2016 9:58 AM
|
Reply to: Message 512 by Faith
05-10-2016 9:26 AM
|
|
Re: Ignorance of Genetics
quote:
If I can't understand what you are saying you aren't exactly successfully refuting me.
Well, if that isn't about the most logic free statement I've ever heard (and I've heard a few). JB Edited by ThinAirDesigns, : No reason given.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 512 by Faith, posted 05-10-2016 9:26 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 518 by Faith, posted 05-10-2016 10:00 AM | | ThinAirDesigns has not replied |
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 638 of 986 (784113)
05-12-2016 10:43 AM
|
Reply to: Message 583 by Faith
05-11-2016 12:23 AM
|
|
Re: Ignorance of Genetics
I've done a LOT of reading in geology and evolutionary theory online already, lots and lots. I have books on both subjects, both creationist and noncreationist. I've selected the information that contributes to the arguments I want to make and set aside information that isn't relevant to them. The "If I decided not to know about it it's not relevant" method is just another example of the "Not Science" method. JB
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 583 by Faith, posted 05-11-2016 12:23 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 646 by Faith, posted 05-12-2016 3:06 PM | | ThinAirDesigns has not replied |
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
|
|
Message 672 of 986 (784154)
05-12-2016 11:34 PM
|
Reply to: Message 671 by Faith
05-12-2016 11:14 PM
|
|
Truth wins. Evidence wins. Reason wins. Consistency wins. JB
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 671 by Faith, posted 05-12-2016 11:14 PM | | Faith has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 673 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-12-2016 11:40 PM | | ThinAirDesigns has not replied |
|
ThinAirDesigns
Member (Idle past 2391 days) Posts: 564 Joined: 02-12-2015
|
|
|
Message 963 of 986 (784982)
05-26-2016 10:10 PM
|
|
|
It ends the way it started
Nearly a thousand posts ago (and as the very first poster) I asked the most critical question if one is going to demonstrate "The Science in Creationism" Still unanswered -- which is ample proof that there is no science in creationism
quote:
Dawn, would you mind giving me say 3 examples of things that would falsify your belief in the Biblical version of YEC and also 3 things that would falsify the Ussher chronology world wide flood? (assuming you believe in those) Thanks
JB
|
™ Version 4.2