Phat writes:
Depends which reality you choose to accept.
I should be more specific. I mean "reality" in the objective sense. What we can all agree on is "reality". Trees are reality. Weather is reality.
Phat writes:
How does God relate to reality?
By this definition, He doesn't.
Phat writes:
But what if you have no evidence?
As I've already said, if you have no evidence you're entitled to any hare-brained opinion you like. But what makes your hare-brained opinion superior to somebody else's hare-brained opinion?
Phat writes:
Furthermore what if evidence itself is not enough for you to worship God?
How could there be evidence for us to
worship God? If there was incontrovertible evidence that God existed, what on earth would that have to do with worshipping Him?
Phat writes:
You may say that He is portrayed as a cruel uncaring tyrant. If so, why would it matter if there was evidence of his existence?
Huh? Isn't a real tyrant worse than an imaginary one? if you tell me there's an imminent danger that could destroy most of the people I know, don't you think I'd want to know whether it was real or imaginary?
Phat writes:
You would still reserve that little throne in your brain...where you sit, and pass judgment on Him.
You're passing judgement the same as I am. The only difference is that you're finding Him innocent, despite the testimony that you yourself give to His guilt.