What is a True Christian?

Sure it did. Survival of the fittest is about reproduction, not fighting to the death. Submission is often a part of reproduction.Turning the other cheek and loving thy neighbour (with or without reproduction) do make our society - and humanity by extension - more fit for survival.

---

“If you had half a brain, wouldn't you have realized after the second time, that it was you, not God?” -- riVeRraT (see context here)“The endearing controvertist! One needs to become acute in the ploys of his kind.” -- ThreeDogs

When Paul told Timothy that "all scripture is given by inspiration of God" do you think he meant the letters that he was going to write next week?

His next question should be, "How are you defining scripture?" As you seem to understand, Paul was probably referring primarily to the Old Testament (and probably some non-canonical books) but not anything that he had written.Of course Timothy and you should test what Paul wrote for integrity and look for evidence. You should always look for evidence. If an apple can hit me on the head, I'll wait for it to happen. I'm not going to believe that an apple has hit me until it does.But your point of view seems to be that apples can't fall - i.e. there can't be evidence. In that case, why should I believe what you believe? Why not the Hindu gods or the native American gods?

Because Paul was human. If you mean homeless people, of course I don't. They're not trying to sell me anything, so integrity doesn't enter into it. If you mean business people, of course I do. It's buyer beware, isn't it? Yes, I have friends who - to put it politely - you can't believe everything they say. In some cases they're joking; in some cases they may be deluding themselves; in some cases they may be trying to delude me. So yes, I have to test what they say.

What kind of family rejects somebody who wants to be a member?

One of the primary differences is that a club can revoke your membership; a family can not. Your father is always your father, whether he "disowns" you or not. Clubs and families both have rules. Both may or may not enforce all of the rules strictly. The difference lies in the permanence of the enforcement (see above). A father would take those factors into account. (If they didn't, there wouldn't be a preponderance of "difficult" children waiting to be adopted.) In a club, any of those factors might be grounds for rejecting an application.So, is Christianity a family or a club?

As I asked Phat: Do you actually think Paul was talking about his own writings? The epistles that he hadn't even written yet?

Yes, 2 Peter calls Paul's epistles "scriptures" - i.e. writings. What else would they be called? But 2 Peter doesn't explicitly call Paul's epistles "inspired by God", does it? My question isn't whether the early church considered Paul's writings inspired. It's whether Paul himself considered them inspired when he wrote to Timothy.

What means are you using?

I don't see how the early church has any relevance to what I asked. There were already disputes in the early church about what was canonical.What I asked was whether PAUL thought HIS OWN writings were inspired (before he wrote them). Another way of asking would be, "How full of himself was he?"