|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Clinton Email Controversy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pressie Member Posts: 2103 From: Pretoria, SA Joined: |
Hyroglyphx writes: Actually, my direct authorities are well aware of the classified information on my private server. I actually cc them every time I send classified info using my private server. They usually get those cc's a lot later, but they get it and know exactly what I do where, when and why. So you are harboring classified material on your private server(s)? Is that what you are telling me? Because it could also be true that certain South African authorities might not be aware of this... in which case, that would be the reason you haven't been charged, not that it's necessarily not that big of a deal. Food for thought. Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8513 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.2
|
pawn everything off as a "vast rightwing conspiracy," 'Cept it's in the open, isn't it. The reich-wing is openly trying to destroy Clinton because she's a democrat and because the MRAs, which make up the bulk of the reich, hate a strong powerful woman.
pass it off on "Russian hackers," 'Cept the russian hackers are real, aren't they. Putin doesn't like a strong powerful woman who would get in his way anymore then the reich-wing MRAs do. He'd rather have a scatter-brained malleable admirer in the oval office.
She's a crook, Really? How so? Are you prepared to contrast the real charitable work of the Clinton Foundation with the self-serving scam of the Trump foundation? Are you ready to discuss the realities of Whitewater, Vince Foster, e-mails, Benghazi, travelgate? Not just the riech-wing talking points but the facts as numerous investigations have revealed?
she's a megalomaniac Oh, heaven help us. A megalomaniac in politics? Say it isn't so! That only makes her equal to every other politico in Washington. Boo hoo.
she will play a huge role in World War III breaking out As I recall Ronald Reagan was supposed to walk into the Oval Office and immediately push "the button". You scare-monger weenies are a laugh. Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9076 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.7
|
So you are harboring classified material on your private server(s)?
But we all know that that is not in reality what Hillary Clinton was doing.Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9076 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.7
|
She's a crook, she's a megalomaniac
Alas, you have no evidence for this do you? Why do you hold her to a higher standard than you do male politicians?
and she will play a huge role in World War III breaking out if elected.
Your reasoning for this remark?Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 411 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Hyroglyphx writes:
It's a bumbling, incompetent conspiracy. See NosyNed's Message 41.
I know it's so easy to pawn everything off as a "vast rightwing conspiracy,"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22388 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 5.2
|
Has the FBI been politicized? FBI Director Comey's 10/28 letter raised strong suspicions, but today's announcement removes a great deal of doubt. According to the NYT:
quote: Is this to be the FBI's position on the Clinton emails, that from now until the end of time the discovery of any Clinton emails on any device is grounds for public announcements that the investigation is being reopened so that a decision can be made anew about whether to charge her? This is absurd, inflammatory, defamatory and absurd. Pleh! --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rrhain Member Posts: 6351 From: San Diego, CA, USA Joined:
|
RAZD writes:
quote: Huh? You do know that there is no evidence of any wrongdoing of any kind regarding the Clinton Foundation, yes?
quote: First, as has been pointed out, you have no idea what the emails contain. Second, again, there is no evidence of any wrongdoing of any kind regarding the Clinton Foundation. In fact, it is one of the highest rated charity organizations in the world. Charity Watch rates it higher than the Red Cross. It gives 88% of its money on actual services and spends only $3 for every $100 raised (meaning they only spend $3 to raise $100 compared to the Red Cross which spends $30 to raise $100). You do realize that the Clinton Cash book was a complete screed, yes? I realize that the cognitive dissonance you are feeling is distressing, but you need to get past this silly false equivalency. Edited by Rrhain, : Better clarification on how spend/raise is meant.Rrhain Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time. Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Is this to be the FBI's position on the Clinton emails, that from now until the end of time the discovery of any Clinton emails on any device is grounds for public announcements that the investigation is being reopened so that a decision can be made anew about whether to charge her? He said he did it because:
He also acknowledged that:
Full letter to the FBI:
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9970 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6
|
That reminds me of the self-fulfilling question, "Can I interrupt you?". There is every reason to think that talking about any new group of Clinton emails would damage her campaign, and he did it anyway. His job was to stand by the rules of the department, even in the face of heated criticism from politicians. He failed to do his job.
And I only say this in the context of the FBI fixing their own house. I am absolutely devastated that my girl lost, but I see no reason to be a sore loser about the whole thing. The emails were but one flaw, and we all just need to move on . . . to 2020, very quickly, like at light speed, no delay . . .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
There is every reason to think that talking about any new group of Clinton emails would damage her campaign, and he did it anyway. His job was to stand by the rules of the department, even in the face of heated criticism from politicians. He failed to do his job. I'm sorry, are you saying that it was his job to avoid doing damage to the campaign, because that's what the rules of his department are?
I am absolutely devastated that my girl lost Yeah, Jill Stein is an outstanding woman
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 9970 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
Cat Sci writes: I'm sorry, are you saying that it was his job to avoid doing damage to the campaign, because that's what the rules of his department are? Yes, within context. It has been a long standing rule not to talk about ongoing investigations involving a candidate within 60 days of a campaign.
Yeah, Jill Stein is an outstanding woman
I guess that makes me Green with envy, .
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024