Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 114 (8733 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-26-2017 8:40 PM
429 online now:
DrJones*, frako, jar, ThinAirDesigns (4 members, 425 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: timtak
Post Volume:
Total: 801,992 Year: 6,598/21,208 Month: 2,359/2,634 Week: 22/525 Day: 22/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mediterranean sea, Hudson bay and the Mississippi embayment
Kalopin
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 12-09-2016


Message 1 of 10 (795265)
12-09-2016 11:12 PM


What do the Mediterranean sea, the Hudson bay and the Mississippi embayment have in common? It is my intention to convince that the formation process for these three geological features originates from an extraterrestrial source and that they are, in fact, impact craters, three of the world's largest astroblemes...

Studying this from a geological perspective, the features, historical accounts, all the available scientific and observational data and once every detail has been understood, it appears that there is plenty of evidence to give proof to each scenario...

It is my belief that approx. 13kya [YDB] the Moon impacted where the Mediterranean sea now exists, ending the Pleistocene and that this was the Gothenburg geomagnetic excursion, the "great deluge", some of the science behind the Bible and the reason for the mass extinctions, the instant loss of megaflora and megafauna...

The proof for this event lay in the ejecta blanket strewn field, covering over four continents and containing nanodiamonds which formed at temps exceeding 2200*C. That, and the fact that there are pyramids and temples, which were built on top of Chicxulub crater that are now buried beneath the ejecta blanket of limestone melt rock, the same limestone which formed the Ozarks and was ejected from beneath the Mediterranean sea...

When the Moon impacted it slowed the outer plates and mantle in relation to the faster spinning, crystalized iron inner core, increasing electromagnetism, gravity and the length of Earth's day, forcing plants and animals to grow more compact, smaller and to live much shorter lives, causing devolution and the birth of a much more primitve Clovis culture...

About 2500yrs after the Moon had impacted, a comet struck the Hudson bay, emptying out lake Agassiz, causing more extinctions, more loss of history and technologies and ended the Clovis period. As all this is written in the geography, sedimentary layers, ice core data and there is a magnetic anomaly directly in the middle... I believe this loss of magnetism may be from the cometary nucleus still attached, welded and magnetically to the mantle. The "shatter" effect of the islands and how Greenland was pushed upward to the northeast argue this point as well...

The latter two impacts were discovered after an investigation into the formation of the Mississippi embayment and the shockwave pattern throughout the upper lithosphere... This research intends to prove that a meteor from the debris trail leftover from a sungrazer comet [C/1811 F1] impacted northeastern Marshall county, Mississippi on December 16, 1811 and was the actual cause of what is known as the historic New Madrid earthquakes of 1811-1812...
The close passing of this comet produced a serial impact, the mini ice age from 1811-1817, many eruptions, earthquakes, strange weather patterns, [wars, plagues] eventually causing the eruption of Mt. Tambora and "the year without a summer 1816". This was a global catastrophe...

I have just had a paper published entitled "An extraterrestrial origin for the upland formation of the Mississippi embayment and would like to invite you all to give it your review, as I am very interested in your opinion/s... I would like to recommend a great book- "Travels to the equinoctial regions of America" by Alexander Von Humboldt. In chapter 14 he has recorded many of the disasters which occurred at this same moment and in this area. At this same time, in December of 1811, Caracas Venezuela also had a major "earthquake" killing many thousands...

Please go over all the details, the satellite views, geography, geology, historical accounts, scientific and observational data, study the rocks [impactites]... as, it is my belief that the evidence will speak for itself and is written within the geography of this planet, I am hoping these findings will [eventually] be verified, to correct a great deal of misunderstood science and lost history and to hopefully have this put in curriculum...
thanks


Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-09-2016 11:43 PM Kalopin has responded

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3740
Joined: 09-26-2002


(5)
Message 2 of 10 (795266)
12-09-2016 11:43 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Kalopin
12-09-2016 11:12 PM


You have kind of a variation on the theme, at Mediterranean, Appalachian, Pangaea Impact Crater

A member/moderator there responded:

quote:
The sedimentary, stratigraphic, geochronological, geophysical, geochemical, palaeontological, geomagnetic and other geological data, observations and derived hypotheses demonstrate, beyond any reasonable doubt that your speculation lacks any match with reality.

I can't come up with a better appraisal.

Maybe you're a candidate to be Donald Trump's director of the United States Geological Survey (says the admin, looking for cheap (+) markings for this message ).

Adminnemooseus


Or something like that©.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Kalopin, posted 12-09-2016 11:12 PM Kalopin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Kalopin, posted 12-10-2016 11:23 AM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

  
Kalopin
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 12-09-2016


Message 3 of 10 (795278)
12-10-2016 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Adminnemooseus
12-09-2016 11:43 PM


yea, I know... I hope you may find time to go through the whole thread. It becomes obvious, the frustration of those trying to form any type of rebuttal, they all end up with some silly insults and/or personal attacks. It has never been my intention to make anyone look bad, but I have studied this in, I believe, just about every single detail available. I have known about the close passing of C/1811 F1 and the meteor impact which occurred on Dec. 16, 1811 now for about 20yrs. and have been met with resistance from all those who would be supposed to further investigate. I believe mostly because of the grant money and reputations involved, as pride and greed have defeated science going back past the "flat earth" "theory"...

All I can do is to ask you all to go over every single detail. I will gladly post the evidence here as well, but if you care to visit a few more of my posts, I would like to suggest a few, what I believe to be, better ones-
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=378...
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3796
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3757
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=3691

Please see the amount of evidence that has been posted and let me know what you think. Yes, I realize this goes against a great deal of what is presently being taught and that has a lot to do with why this has been and is being ignored, rejected and marginalized for so long...
The original site for the 1811 event is at http://koolkreations.wix.com/kalopins-legacy
I appreciate your thorough investigation into this, as I am sure you are aware how important this research will be to understand what had actually occurred and to be able to mitigate such a future event...

Once you go over every single detail, I believe you will find that there is actually proof for each of these events and is quite obvious. I would like to ask you, once you all have verified these findings, to broadcast this information and to let everyone know the truths behind the myths... :-]

Edited by Kalopin, : wording


This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-09-2016 11:43 PM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by AdminNosy, posted 12-10-2016 11:39 AM Kalopin has responded

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4751
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


(4)
Message 4 of 10 (795279)
12-10-2016 11:39 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Kalopin
12-10-2016 11:23 AM


Not the Right Site for this
We are a debate site and one of the rules is that you bring your argument here. We do not allow bare links which others are forced to read.

If you do want to discuss your ideas here you will have to gradually (NOT in a giant copy and paste) develop the thesis within a discussion of those who might be interested.

I don't think this is your interest so I don't think this is the right place for you.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Kalopin, posted 12-10-2016 11:23 AM Kalopin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Kalopin, posted 12-10-2016 12:17 PM AdminNosy has not yet responded

Kalopin
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 12-09-2016


Message 5 of 10 (795281)
12-10-2016 12:17 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by AdminNosy
12-10-2016 11:39 AM


Re: Not the Right Site for this
well, go agaed, try me out, ask the questions and I will gladly answer...

What would you like to know first?
Would you like to know what the Mayans were mapping? ...not just Earth's wobble on its axis, but the orbital elements of the Moon...

Would you like to know how earth's moon would be able to accomplish this impact? ...because Earth's largest satellite is the leftover iron inner core from a once habitable planet in another solar system, that was travellling ahead of this one and whose star had went supernova, as this is commonplace throughout the universe as these leftover iron cores are attracted to stars and inner solar systems...

Would you like to know how evolution and creation are right in a few ways and wrong in so many other areas? ...understanding creation by modern perspective, I am sure you are aware that we are now able to genetically splice and produce hybrids and different forms of life? ...and as far as evolution- the dinosaurs existed during the Pleistocene. Just recently dino bones were discovered in China containing massive amounts of soft tissue and even feathers intact. ...and highly advanced civilizations and intelligent life go way back much further in time. The pyramids, obelisks and most of the megalithic structures were built during the latter days of the Pleistocene, when there was less gravity...

Give this study-
Where else would all this limestone have come from?
How are man-made structures beneath tons of limestone, deep in caves and now many beneath water?
What covered all the cities now being found?
...please look up present theories for the formation process for- the Ozarks, the Mississippi embayment, the Appalachias, Himalayas, Mariana trench,... and compare what is being taught to these findings. Yes, it would take such a massive impact to break up a supercontinent and to form all these structures. Pangaea was intact during the Pleistocene. So, you see, this is the reason for the loss of history and the, yet to be fully understood, technologies that had accumulated up to the end of the Pleistocene...

Give me your argument and see how there will be no other option, as this is all tangible evidence. The buried pyramids on the Yucatan are proof positive...

Edited by Kalopin, : wording


This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by AdminNosy, posted 12-10-2016 11:39 AM AdminNosy has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12390
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


(2)
Message 6 of 10 (795297)
12-10-2016 4:59 PM


You have a fascinating thesis, but until you follow moderation your thread proposal will stay here in the thread proposal directory and eventually be closed. You must post an introductory message for your thread that describes a little of the evidence and explanation supporting your thesis or your thread won't be promoted. Up to you.

I'm the third moderator telling you the same thing, so take this as confirmation that we do sincerely try to avoid nonsense sneaking through the thread proposal stage.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Kalopin, posted 12-10-2016 7:41 PM Admin has acknowledged this reply

  
Kalopin
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 12-09-2016


Message 7 of 10 (795307)
12-10-2016 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Admin
12-10-2016 4:59 PM


...more evidence...
https://media.licdn.com/...GM5ZS04ZmRiLWM4MjBiYWIwZTc0Mw.jpg
Mediterranean-
...this image shows the YDB strewn field. Notice there are no samples taken beneath the Atlantic ocean? The north and south American plates were on top of this area before the Moon impacted 13kya and is what split the oceans forming the Pacific and is the main force to produce the "ring of fire"... Notice the ejecta blanket could not have covered such a vast distance, as all the way across the Atlantic...

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3677428/
abstract-
"...Airbursts/impacts by a fragmented comet or asteroid have been proposed at the Younger Dryas onset (12.80 ± 0.15 ka) based on identification of an assemblage of impact-related proxies, including microspherules, nanodiamonds, and iridium. Distributed across four continents at the Younger Dryas boundary (YDB), spherule peaks have been independently confirmed in eight studies, but unconfirmed in two others, resulting in continued dispute about their occurrence, distribution, and origin. To further address this dispute and better identify YDB spherules, we present results from one of the largest spherule investigations ever undertaken regarding spherule geochemistry, morphologies, origins, and processes of formation. We investigated 18 sites across North America, Europe, and the Middle East, performing nearly 700 analyses on spherules using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy for geochemical analyses and scanning electron microscopy for surface microstructural characterization. Twelve locations rank among the world’s premier end-Pleistocene archaeological sites, where the YDB marks a hiatus in human occupation or major changes in site use. Our results are consistent with melting of sediments to temperatures >2,200 °C by the thermal radiation and air shocks produced by passage of an extraterrestrial object through the atmosphere; they are inconsistent with volcanic, cosmic, anthropogenic, lightning, or authigenic sources. We also produced spherules from wood in the laboratory at >1,730 °C, indicating that impact-related incineration of biomass may have contributed to spherule production. At 12.8 ka, an estimated 10 million tonnes of spherules were distributed across ∼50 million square kilometers, similar to well-known impact strewnfields and consistent with a major cosmic impact event...."

10 million tons over 50 million square kilometers? 2200*C? What force could create such destruction? This impact basically sterilized the entire north American continent... [13kya]

Hudson bay-
http://ottawa-rasc.ca/wiki/index.php?title=Odale_articles...
http://ottawa-rasc.ca/...Odale_articles_hudsonbayarc_Arc.jpg
As there has been some excellent research concerning the formation of the Hudson bay, I would like to refer you all to some work on the Nastapoka arc, though it is my contention the entire bay was formed from an impact and, if the plate had just entered near this position from a previous, much more catastrophic impact, the timing would be right for the Clovis period and the emptying out of lake Agassiz, as the rise in sea levels, sedimentary layers, ice core data [flooding of the English channel, covering of Beringia,...] would all coincide with this event and would make sense to be the result of a [small?] cometary impact, around 10.5kya...

abstract-
"... The Nastapoka Arc, on the east coast of Hudson Bay, is almost perfectly circular and closely follows the unconformable contact between Archean Superior province gneisses and shallowly seaward dipping early Proterozoic Nastapoka Group supracrustals. Its form may be explained by flexing of the lithosphere due to loading by thrust sheets from the Trans-Hudson orogen to the west. Such flexing produces a peripheral bulge east of the coast which should be reflected in a positive gravity anomaly there. Gravity data averaged around the arc show such a positive anomaly, although its precise amplitude is uncertain because of local variation in the gravity field. Lithospheric flexure of the arc due to loading can be modeled by superposition of discshaped loads centered on the arc. For a lithospheric Young's modulus of 1.0 × 1011 N m−2 and Poisson's ratio 0.25, the present geometry of the arc can be reproduced only by reducing the elastic thickness to 20±2 km. The peripheral bulge predicted for the model yields a gravity anomaly very similar to that observed if it is fully imaged at the Moho. The absence of a regional negative gravity anomaly over the arc, despite a great thickness of transported rocks present at its center, requires that the crust in the region was unusually thin before thrust emplacement. The unusually low elastic thickness required for the model may reflect highly fractured crust. Both features are consistent with the former presence of a rifted continental margin in the region, as predicted for many models of the Trans-Hudson orogen..."

Mississippi embayment-
There is a central, semi-circular structure in northeastern Marshall county, Mississippi, extending partly into Tennessee,
which every line in the topography emanates out from in a shockwave pattern. On the northwest face and near mid-basin,
there is a central rebound peak where numerous unusual rocks were found with all aspects of impactites and meteorites
with fusion crust, the appearance of nanodiamonds and shocked quartz.

Currently the evidence consists of the original accounts, newspaper articles, astronomers observations, impactites [rocks],
dendrology, scientific data, immediate topography and satellite views.

On satellite, with the upper embayment in view, draw a line down the middle of the New Madrid bend to where the
impactites were found in North Slayden, Mississippi. Notice the design in the terrain showing angle, direction and force
of impact.

Coordinates : 34* 58’ 31.38” x 89* 24”17.15”... should take you to a small field near mid-basin. From this point pan out
to Mill Pond and Mill Pond Road, just where it meets with Early Grove Road follows the circular terrain of the inner
basin. Just to the east of Early Grove rd. is a white sand creek [Early Grove creek]. Follow this northward, over the
Tennessee state line, upward passed the Wolf river bottoms, through a tree line to the west and back down, to the other
side and passed the western side of the impression. This is the first in a series of shockwaves, reverberates out many times
to the edge of, and shows the same design as the outer shape of the embayment. Pan out, following each river to the north,
[the Hatchie River, Wolf River, Loosahathie River,…] shows the larger waves from a shock pattern that extends out to
The Tennessee River on the east passed The St. Francis River on the west.

Below this structure the terrain runs from east to west and is where the land was pulled northward to produce large
chasms that were later blocked by earthen dams to form lakes, [such as Arkabutla, Sardis and Enid]. All the semi-circular
fractures throughout Eastern Arkansas and sand blows encircle this structure. The crater has been subjected to extensive
amounts of erosion, foliage growth and development, mostly because of being in such a fertile river valley. Once this is
removed, all lines in the topography surround and point to this central location.

Reading the original accounts gives better understanding of what was actually witnessed. There were many to see
meteoric lights before, during and after the first earthquake as far as Savannah Georgia, [way too far to be any naturally
occurring earthquake lights]. Many to believe the comet had went down in the Ohio river or had touched the mountains
of California. Lights were seen so bright that, at two-thirty in the morning a needle could be seen on the floor…
The astronomers observations agree. The comet was seen as fifty percent larger than the Sun in October of 1811 and
William Herschel reported the comet’s tail becoming significantly shorter in November as it was coming toward him.
Comet C/1811 F1 must have been a Sungrazer comet as it wasn’t seen from mid-June 1811 until the latter part of August
1811, which gives it the approximate amount of time for it to travel around the Sun, breaking it apart and then to pass in
front of Earth, leaving a trail of debris and, as the planet revolved through a meteoroid filled dust tail for over a month
caused several meteors to impact, one large enough to reshape the entire Mississippi river valley. On this same day,
December 16, 1811, Caracas, Venezuela was also destroyed. Find accounts of the many disasters associated with the close
passing of a comet at “Travels to the equinoctial regions of America”, chapter 14, by Alexander Von Humboldt, as this
was more than seismic activity throughout the central United States but was a global catastrophe.

ISSN 2348-1218 (print)
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations ISSN 2348-1226 (online)
Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp: (000-000), Month: July - September 2016, Available at: http://www.researchpublish.com
Page | 67
Research Publish Journals

Crater coordinates:
Northern rim- 35* 00’ 17.25”N x 89* 24’ 27.52”W
Southern rim- 34* 58’ 3.25”N x 89* 24’ 22.25”W
Eastern rim- 34* 59’ 11.27”N x 89* 22’ 55.96”W
Western rim- 34* 59’ 15.18”N x 89* 25’ 45.75”W
White sand creek [first in a series of shock waves]-
West- 34* 58’ 28.86”N x 89* 26’ 16.50”W
Northwest- 35* 01’ 59.99”N x 89* 24’ 25.09”W
Northeast- 35* 01’ 05.53”N x 89* 22’ 37.80”W
East- 34* 58’ 17.95”N x 89* 22’ 37.80”W
Approximate crater diameter- 4.25 kilometers or 2.64 miles

REFERENCES
[1] “Travels to the equinoctial regions of America”, Alexander Von Humboldt, Chapter 14
https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/h/humbol ... ter14.html
[2] “1811-12 New Madrid earthquakes, a NEO Connection” http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/1811.htm
[3] “A detailed narrative of the earthquakes which occurred on the 16th day of December, 1811”
Samuel L. Mitchill , transcriptions and notes Susan E. Hough http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/office/hough/mitchill.html
[4] New Madrid newspapers, The Messenger, February 28, 1811 http://www.hsv.com /genlintr/newmadrd
/newspapers/The_Messenger-Feb_28_1811.jpg fourth column near the top “…the comet appeared hazy an dim…”
[5] Eyewitnesses to Mississippi river earthquake terror, Susan E. Hough http://www.showme.net /~ fkeller
/quake/lib/eyewitness1.htm
[6] C/1811 F1 [Great Comet], Gary W. Kronk’s Cometography http://www.cometography.com/lcomets/1811f1.html
ISSN 2348-1218 (print)
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations ISSN 2348-1226 (online)
Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp: (000-000), Month: July - September 2016, Available at: http://www.researchpublish.com
Page | 68
Research Publish Journals
[7] “Panther across the sky- Tecumseh and the New Madrid earthquake”, David Yarrow http://www.ratical.org
/ratville/Tecumseh.html
[8] “New Madrid, first steamboat, quakes, comet”, William L. Pierce http://www.showme.net /~fkeller /quake
/lib/roosevelt.htm
[9] “Newspaper accounts of the new Madrid earthquakes”, Rootsweb, Don E. Wright http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com
/~monewmad/nm-history/paper-5.htm
[10] Charleston S.C. Courier newspaper, Dec. 29-30, 1811 http://www.showme.net/~fkeller/quake/savannah.htm
[11] USGS, Historic earthquakes, “New Madrid 1811-1812 earthquakes” U.S. Geological Survey http:// earthquake
.usgs.gov /earthquakes/states/events/1811_overview.php
[12] “Model for the tectonic evolution of the Mississippi embayment and its contemporary seismicity” M.F. Kane, T.G.
HildenbrandJ.D.Hendrickhttp://geology.geoscienceworld. ... ttp:/www.s cience direct.
Com /science/article/pii/S0264370702000194
APPENDIX - A
List of figures:
ISSN 2348-1218 (print)
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations ISSN 2348-1226 (online)
Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp: (000-000), Month: July - September 2016, Available at: http://www.researchpublish.com
Page | 69
Research Publish Journals
ISSN 2348-1218 (print)
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations ISSN 2348-1226 (online)
Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp: (000-000), Month: July - September 2016, Available at: http://www.researchpublish.com
Page | 70
Research Publish Journals

This is just a start, there is plenty more and there are a lot of good scientists coming to these same conclusions...
[What will it take to get this into curriculum? ..that's the question...]

Edited by Kalopin, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Admin, posted 12-10-2016 4:59 PM Admin has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-10-2016 8:29 PM Kalopin has responded

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3740
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 8 of 10 (795309)
12-10-2016 8:29 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Kalopin
12-10-2016 7:41 PM


Still out of contact with most geologic reality
There may be some germs of truth buried in there, but much is fantasy.

...Moon impacted 13kya...

I think that the Moon impacting the Earth ever is an outlandish concept, much less this having happened 13kya. We wouldn't be here to discuss the matter if such had happened.

MAYBE if you focused in on one event, we MIGHT have something to launch a debate topic.

Adminnemooseus
(Bachelor of Science (BS) degree in geology, by the way)


Or something like that©.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Kalopin, posted 12-10-2016 7:41 PM Kalopin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Kalopin, posted 12-10-2016 9:24 PM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

  
Kalopin
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: 12-09-2016


Message 9 of 10 (795312)
12-10-2016 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Adminnemooseus
12-10-2016 8:29 PM


Re: Still out of contact with most geologic reality
...but really, the "outlandish concept" is what is currently being taught...

What makes you believe that the moon never impacts Earth? Is it your phaulty fysics? What makes you think mountains can pile up over millions of years? your skewed and inaccurate dating processes?

Then explain where the limestone to form the Ozarks came from. Do you see that they are in a westerly projection? ...consisting of almost all limestone? As I am sure you are aware that limestone forms at the bottom of seas, when you look toward the east, what do you see?

The Mississippi embayment is a massive trench, a deep crease, where the entire thickness of a tectonic plate was folded inward on itself. Just to the east of this is the Appalachias, This is where all the surface material, plants, animals, rocks,... were incinerated and pushed into a pile...

The evidence for this extraordinary impact is written in the geography of every single structure surrounding the Mediterranean. There is no other object with enough mass, weight, density, volume, consistency and in orbit to accomplish this feat, as this force was enough to rip the entire north and south American plates from the mantle, forcing the entire western edge upward and to flip and engulf a massive slab of tectonic plate, known as the Farrallon plate, to form the Rockies and Andies...
...the only object that could impact with enough force to push the entire African plate off the mantle, swivelling at the southwesterly edge of the arabian peninsula and forcing the Indian plate upward, against any ocean currents and against the rotation of the planet to form the Himalayas...

Study how every single tectonic interaction emanates out from the Mediterranean sea. The only plate left "securely" attached to the mantle is the Eurasian plate...
Do you believe that the pyramids and temples [Xibalba] deep within caves and underwater were built there?
Do you believe people got the shovels, covered their cities and moved on?
Do you believe the sea levels slowly rose over long periods?
Do you believe that all the stories are just made up out of nowhere?

The physics is wrong. The Moon has impacted this planet on several occasion and this only makes sense, as there is no finite orbit.
It is well known that Earth's moon is retreating at a rate of about one inch per year, not much in a human life span, but add it up-
At about every 13ky [half the processional cycle, as the Moon's orbit coincides with earth's wobble on its axis] the Moon comes into contact with the edge of the force of the magnetosphere. At magnetopause the Moon begins to spin in retrograde, allowing it to come back into close range. At this point, if there is enough imbalance [wobble] then there may be an impact...
The Anunnaki, Olmecs, Mississippians,... were aware of this and had made preparations...

Please make an argument for what is currently being taught. I will appreciate any form of rebuttal...


This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-10-2016 8:29 PM Adminnemooseus has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12390
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


(5)
Message 10 of 10 (795332)
12-11-2016 8:24 AM


Thread Proposal Denied
Shutting this down.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017