Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,807 Year: 3,064/9,624 Month: 909/1,588 Week: 92/223 Day: 3/17 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Great Creationist Fossil Failure
mindspawn
Member (Idle past 2659 days)
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10-22-2012


Message 1090 of 1163 (795686)
12-15-2016 9:10 AM
Reply to: Message 1089 by jar
12-15-2016 8:51 AM


Re: the evidence supports evolution and Creationism is just a sorry joke
quote:
You simply continue to post falsehood after falsehood.
That is NOT what anyone has posted and to claim that is what others do is simply another lie.
What has been posted is twofold, first the fact that we got the fossils and you don't and the fact that what is described in the creation myths in the Bible is shown to be false by ALL of the external evidence as well as the fact that the order of creation, the method of creation and the descriptions of the God in the two creation myths in the Bible are mutually exclusive.
You needn't take this so personally. I was speaking to Tangle. My comments applied to him.
"we got the fossils" Since when is evidence owned by evolutionists. The fossil record is general evidence. The fact that most organisms appear fully formed supports creationism. But I wont claim the fossil record as MINE. The evidence belongs to everyone. I support the geological column. It is not evidence of evolution, it is evidence of changing prevalent conditions over time. This is why the prevalent organisms keep changing, because the conditions change. To assume evolving is occurring on the scale required by evolutionists is mere assumption with no evidence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1089 by jar, posted 12-15-2016 8:51 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1093 by jar, posted 12-15-2016 9:26 AM mindspawn has not replied
 Message 1108 by Taq, posted 12-15-2016 10:50 AM mindspawn has not replied

  
mindspawn
Member (Idle past 2659 days)
Posts: 1015
Joined: 10-22-2012


Message 1091 of 1163 (795688)
12-15-2016 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 1052 by Dr Adequate
12-14-2016 4:43 PM


Re: the evidence supports evolution
quote:
Well, the differences between a kangaroo and a wombat apparently don't "indicate a unique species", but their similarities do indicate common descent. So let's agree that any "jump" that size or smaller doesn't "indicate a unique species".
Unless you would like a criterion based on your prejudices rather than actual morphology?
The difference with the Australian marsupials is that they are genetically proven to have a recent common ancestor. Additionally even though they have rapidly diversified, there are obvious common features. One does not need to be an expert to see the similarities between the Australian possum, the "marsupial mouse", the kangaroo and the wallaby. There are significant differences but all these marsupials have a similar look.
This Possum looks like a wallaby. It also looks like the marsupial mouse:
Pictures: Cute Animal Magic Sept. 2012 | Metro UK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1052 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-14-2016 4:43 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1094 by Dr Adequate, posted 12-15-2016 9:47 AM mindspawn has not replied
 Message 1109 by Taq, posted 12-15-2016 10:55 AM mindspawn has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024