Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Trump's order on immigration and the wacko liberal response
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 31 of 993 (798036)
01-30-2017 12:36 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by nwr
01-30-2017 12:25 PM


Re: The Propaganda Blitz Against Righeousness
You are obviously abysmally ignorant of American history. All the original colonies but one were founded by PROTESTANT CHRISTIANS and strongly Protestant even as the Constitution was being written. Some did complain that they were betrayed by the Constitution that left out the felt allegiance to God by the VAST majority of the population. Just another little coup against the truth brought about by the Evil One. But even so the Christian character of the nation continued another century and a half or so, reflected in the government in many ways besides the population, in the prayers that open Congress for instance, in various court decisions and so on. But again the Evil One triumphed, turned our own Constitution against its fundamentally Christian inspiration, yes even through the Deists who were soaked in the Bible and made use of its teachings in the formation of the government. Oh there are lots of ways this nation started out and remained Christian for most of its existence.
There is a famous quote wrongly attributed to Toqueville about America being great because America is good, but it's a good concept and I think it's true no matter who said it. We've lost our goodness over the last half century or so. Despite Trump's heroic efforts to restore our greatness I have my doubts that he'll succeed because he isn't going to turn back the badness. Abortion in the millions per year for instance. but there's a long list beyond that.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by nwr, posted 01-30-2017 12:25 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 32 of 993 (798037)
01-30-2017 12:39 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Faith
01-30-2017 12:27 PM


Golly Gosh, defying a Presidential order is probably even more illegal. and in this case certainly is illegal because Trump's order has so much legal weight behind it. That court is wrong and should be impeached.
Following an illegal order is in fact illegal, even if it is given by the President --- as you yourself would have unhesitatingly affirmed any time between noon on January 20th 2009 and noon on January 20th 2017. Can you imagine, Faith, what you'd have said if Obama had pressed on with one of his policies after a court ruled he had to stop? Would you have declared then that it was illegal for federal workers to listen to the courts instead of obeying Obama? Monkeys would fly out of your butt before that happened.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 12:27 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 12:43 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 33 of 993 (798039)
01-30-2017 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by Dr Adequate
01-30-2017 12:39 PM


The executive order is legal through many offices and documents of the government., as the Townhall article says. Defying that order is what is illegal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-30-2017 12:39 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-30-2017 12:55 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 41 by Diomedes, posted 01-30-2017 2:50 PM Faith has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 34 of 993 (798042)
01-30-2017 12:55 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Faith
01-30-2017 12:43 PM


The executive order is legal through many offices and documents of the government., as the Townhall article says. Defying that order is what is illegal.
Is that what they're teaching at Internet Law School nowadays?
No, Faith, when a judge issues an injunction that means you have to stop doing the thing.
Again can I point out, you --- you whited sepulcher --- that if Obama had followed the legal doctrine you are now expounding, you would have completely lost your shit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 12:43 PM Faith has not replied

  
DrJones*
Member
Posts: 2285
From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Joined: 08-19-2004
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 35 of 993 (798043)
01-30-2017 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Faith
01-30-2017 12:27 PM


The President is not a King, you guys had a whole revolution to straighten that out. Even TrumP has to follow the law.

It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds
soon I discovered that this rock thing was true
Jerry Lee Lewis was the devil
Jesus was an architect previous to his career as a prophet
All of a sudden i found myself in love with the world
And so there was only one thing I could do
Was ding a ding dang my dang along ling long - Jesus Built my Hotrod Ministry
Live every week like it's Shark Week! - Tracey Jordan
Just a monkey in a long line of kings. - Matthew Good
If "elitist" just means "not the dumbest motherfucker in the room", I'll be an elitist! - Get Your War On
*not an actual doctor

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 12:27 PM Faith has not replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


(3)
Message 36 of 993 (798046)
01-30-2017 1:23 PM


Thank you Faith!
I am enjoying this thread!

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King
I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend. Thomas Jefferson
Seems to me if its clear that certain things that require ancient dates couldn't possibly be true, we are on our way to throwing out all those ancient dates on the basis of the actual evidence. -- Faith
Some of us are worried about just how much damage he will do in his last couple of weeks as president, to make it easier for the NY Times and Washington post to try to destroy Trump's presidency. -- marc9000

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 37 of 993 (798047)
01-30-2017 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Faith
01-30-2017 12:13 PM


Re: Pictures worth a thousand words
How silly. Jihadists aren't going to attack in great numbers until they've built up a sufficient population to take over a nation. ...
Paranoid delusion. Whacko alt right world based on fantasy.
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 12:13 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 1:35 PM RAZD has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 38 of 993 (798050)
01-30-2017 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by RAZD
01-30-2017 1:23 PM


Re: Pictures worth a thousand words
Paranoid delusion. Whacko alt right world based on fantasy
The delusion is yours. I read this a year before 9/11 in the book "Philistine" by Ramon Bennett, which QUOTES many Muslim leaders in the Arab world saying quite clearly that their strategy is to populate other countries to the point that they have enough population to take the country for Allah. But of course you like most people here don't want to know the truth. Since that book was written there has been a steady movement in that very direction. I've mentioned this book before. I'm sure it's not the only source of this information. Probably Jihad Watch is one good internet source.
If you want to know, which I suspect you don't, because you like the delusion that Islam is just a benign peaceful religion, which already takes an amazing level of delusion considering the information that is readily available all over the internet, including of course their occasional indulgence in murder in honor of Allah.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by RAZD, posted 01-30-2017 1:23 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by RAZD, posted 01-31-2017 7:40 AM Faith has replied

  
herebedragons
Member (Idle past 878 days)
Posts: 1517
From: Michigan
Joined: 11-22-2009


(2)
Message 39 of 993 (798053)
01-30-2017 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by RAZD
01-30-2017 11:57 AM


Pictures may be worth a 1000 words, but sometimes a 1000 words are just not enough
Interesting chart RAZD, but I am skeptical of its claims. I get the basic premise, that our fears are misplaced, but for those numbers to be zero... just seems unrealistic. For example, we fought a war with Iraq during that time frame and certainly some of their citizens killed Americans. Likewise in Somalia and Syria. The Sudanese government was held responsible for the attack on the USS Cole in 2000 where 17 US sailors died. I seem to remember there was some situation with Yemen attacking a military base or ship around that same time where soldiers died.
Maybe they are qualifying the numbers with something like "Number of Americans killed on American soil" but the heading doesn't say that. Maybe these are numbers for refugees, but if that's the case, then Saudi Arabia's numbers seem high - since the 911 hijackers were not refugees. Maybe they exclude military operations and only count civilians killed?
Maybe you could provide the source and clear up what those numbers actually mean...
HBD

Whoever calls me ignorant shares my own opinion. Sorrowfully and tacitly I recognize my ignorance, when I consider how much I lack of what my mind in its craving for knowledge is sighing for... I console myself with the consideration that this belongs to our common nature. - Francesco Petrarca
"Nothing is easier than to persuade people who want to be persuaded and already believe." - another Petrarca gem.
Ignorance is a most formidable opponent rivaled only by arrogance; but when the two join forces, one is all but invincible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by RAZD, posted 01-30-2017 11:57 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-30-2017 2:37 PM herebedragons has not replied
 Message 43 by RAZD, posted 01-30-2017 2:56 PM herebedragons has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(2)
Message 40 of 993 (798054)
01-30-2017 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by herebedragons
01-30-2017 2:00 PM


Yes, on American soil. Source: that notorious hotbed of wacko liberals, the Cato Institute.
https://www.cato.org/...-migration-national-security-reasons

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by herebedragons, posted 01-30-2017 2:00 PM herebedragons has not replied

  
Diomedes
Member
Posts: 995
From: Central Florida, USA
Joined: 09-13-2013


(1)
Message 41 of 993 (798055)
01-30-2017 2:50 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Faith
01-30-2017 12:43 PM


The executive order is legal through many offices and documents of the government., as the Townhall article says. Defying that order is what is illegal.
Um, so what you are saying is, when a Texas judge ordered an injunction against one of Obama's executive orders, that judge did not have the authority to do so?
Injunction Against Obama's Executive Action on Immigration Approved | Time
So what you are saying is Obama was in his rights to just ignore the injunction and move ahead with his plans?
You DO understand how our three branches of government are set up, yes? Executive, Legislative and Judicial. We don't live in a monarchy last I checked.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 12:43 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 2:53 PM Diomedes has not replied
 Message 47 by PaulK, posted 01-30-2017 3:09 PM Diomedes has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 42 of 993 (798056)
01-30-2017 2:53 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Diomedes
01-30-2017 2:50 PM


There is written law on Trump's side. I don't know the legal status of Obama's actions you are talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Diomedes, posted 01-30-2017 2:50 PM Diomedes has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-30-2017 2:58 PM Faith has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1425 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 43 of 993 (798057)
01-30-2017 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by herebedragons
01-30-2017 2:00 PM


Maybe they are qualifying the numbers with something like "Number of Americans killed on American soil" but the heading doesn't say that. ...
Indeed it doesn't say that, but the issue is about immigrants and people in the US killing Americans.
The other chart in Message 21 is a bit clearer on that (it would be hard to imagine foreign beds being deadly here.
... I get the basic premise, that our fears are misplaced, but for those numbers to be zero... just seems unrealistic. For example, we fought a war with Iraq during that time frame and certainly some of their citizens killed Americans. Likewise in Somalia and Syria. ...
Indeed I would expect that any country that the US invades in their perpetual war game some people would fight back, even if it were a losing proposition, or they would leave (thus the immigrant problem is OUR making).
Enjoy

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by herebedragons, posted 01-30-2017 2:00 PM herebedragons has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 44 of 993 (798059)
01-30-2017 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Faith
01-30-2017 2:53 PM


There is written law on Trump's side.
The judge issued a stay, Faith. Trump is breaking the law.
Jesus, you people. For eight years Obama obeyed the rule of law and you denounced him as a tyrant. It took eight days for Trump to decide he was above the law and you break out the pompoms and cheerleader costumes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 2:53 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Faith, posted 01-30-2017 3:07 PM Dr Adequate has replied
 Message 48 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-30-2017 3:13 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1465 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 45 of 993 (798060)
01-30-2017 3:07 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Dr Adequate
01-30-2017 2:58 PM


The court is wrong, but that will be shown in any case, so whatever is right in response to the stay I'm for it. I'd think the court would know the order is legal but I guess I'm nave to expect such sanity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-30-2017 2:58 PM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Dr Adequate, posted 01-30-2017 3:09 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 49 by Diomedes, posted 01-30-2017 3:21 PM Faith has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024