Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,755 Year: 4,012/9,624 Month: 883/974 Week: 210/286 Day: 17/109 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The 2017 Republican Controlled U.S. Congress
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 44 of 86 (799637)
02-12-2017 1:31 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by RAZD
02-12-2017 7:32 AM


Re: SCOTUS on gerrymandering?
RAZD writes:
Because of the way US elections are run it defaults to two parties. Every time a third party does happen to beat one of the established parties that party usually disappears.
Just out of curiosity, what is the difference between the US and Canada that allows third parties to be successful in Canada?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by RAZD, posted 02-12-2017 7:32 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Porosity, posted 02-12-2017 1:43 PM ringo has replied
 Message 47 by Theodoric, posted 02-12-2017 2:24 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 46 of 86 (799646)
02-12-2017 2:08 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Porosity
02-12-2017 1:43 PM


Re: SCOTUS on gerrymandering?
Porosity writes:
private funding. Canada's federal election finance laws put limits on contributions to political parties and candidates. Only individuals not corporations or trade unions may donate.
That only goes back to the 1970s. We've had significant third parties at least as far back as the 1920s and 30s - notably Labour, Progressive, CCF, Social Credit - when there was little or no regulation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Porosity, posted 02-12-2017 1:43 PM Porosity has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by RAZD, posted 02-12-2017 2:48 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 48 of 86 (799648)
02-12-2017 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Theodoric
02-12-2017 2:24 PM


Re: SCOTUS on gerrymandering?
Theodoric writes:
Parliamentary vs Presidential system
I know we don't have separate executive and legislative branches but what does that have to do with third parties?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Theodoric, posted 02-12-2017 2:24 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 50 of 86 (799652)
02-12-2017 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by RAZD
02-12-2017 2:48 PM


Re: SCOTUS on gerrymandering?
The Electoral College is a factor in Presidential elections but what about the Senate and House? What prevents third parties there?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by RAZD, posted 02-12-2017 2:48 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by jar, posted 02-12-2017 3:35 PM ringo has seen this message but not replied
 Message 52 by RAZD, posted 02-12-2017 4:31 PM ringo has replied
 Message 53 by NoNukes, posted 02-13-2017 10:10 AM ringo has seen this message but not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 54 of 86 (799688)
02-13-2017 10:52 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by RAZD
02-12-2017 4:31 PM


Re: SCOTUS on gerrymandering?
RAZD writes:
The party in power as governor rules how elections are run, how the ballots are organized and what you have to do to get on the ballot.
That explains a lot. Our system is more top-down. There are differences from province to province but they don't go much beyond opening and closing times for polling stations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by RAZD, posted 02-12-2017 4:31 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024