There have been been cases where wealthy families have had to give up their homes for refugees
Anecdotes and assertions are not evidence. Show us a news report or official reference to this happening. A name of the people that this actually happened to, I know a guy that has a cousin that knows a guy is not evidence. A YouTube rant is worthless and probably a lie. If it wasn't a lie they would have referred to the actual people it happened to.
As usual, Faith's source is lying. Sweden is having difficulty finding housing. The government asked that wealthy Swedes voluntarily help by renting their second homes to refugees.
Nobody was forced to do anything.
Nobody was even asked to leave their primary residence.
quote:Mr Rashid said he had been pleased by a "surprisingly strong" response from local residents.
He said: "People have called and asked questions and shown much interest.
"We write down all the names and contact them to see what homes are suitable - and hope that even more will be available in the future when more come back from holiday.
"We have received very positive feedback and every extra accommodation we can access is valuable to us."
{ABE} Of course I see others have posted the same link.
Here's a Google page about wealthy Swedes giving up their houses to refugees: Turns out it's not too bad, just their country houses. Property doesn't count of course in a socialist state.
And they get rent. Because property matters in Sweden.
So, nobody forced to do anything. Nobody moved out of their primary residence. Nobody asked to allow refugees to live in their property for free.
That is a Google Search, not evidence of anything except that the Fake News Propaganda mills called Conservative press published lots of copies of the allegations.
No news there Faith. We know they make such claims.
Er, that's a Google search that leads to a newspaper article that thoroughly rebuts Faith's and her video's claims. You overreacted and make a mistake.
It's not a conservative propaganda mill, as her videos are.
And I have to ask why you really think it is wrong to ask people with vacant properties to consider letting them when there is a housing shortage. Surely such a minimal measure is entirely civilised and entirely compatible with democracy.
All I can figure is Faith is a commie. She doesn't think people should be renting out their properties.
The whole thing goes to show how far the radical right will and needs to go in order to come up with anything to justify their position.
If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.
Yes they aren't having to just give them away, I'm glad of that, but at the same time I think people being asked to give up their property to foreigners shows a deterioration of democracy and civilization
There is a world of difference between being asked to do something and being forced to do something. There is a world of difference between giving and renting.
Homeowners forced to give up their homes! Is FAKE NEWS. Its propaganda.
Homeowners asked if they would be prepared to rent out any uninhabited residential properties they own in order to help other people during a shortage. Is real news.
"Sweden's leader -- is he a Prime Minister? Not sure but whatever he is he actually said it would be just fine if the refugees took over Sweden, if they became Sweden." This fake news. It's propaganda. Even the video you got this quote from doesn't print his words to say that. The quote has him saying Sweden is stronger for having immigrants make it what it is.
The narrator translated the written version of what the man said. You can't possibly know anything different.
Why would you trust an atheist Muslim immigrant's version of events, Faith? Here are his actual words:
quote:The narrator translated the written version of what the man said. You can't possibly know anything different.
Faith, just because *you* don't know Swedish doesn't mean nobody else does.
The finer point is that I have the entire statement made by...do you even know his name? Do you know who you're talking about?
He didn't say what is claimed.
You still haven't answered my question. Third time:
If Ronald Reagan said that the country belongs to the young, would you interpret that to mean Reagan was saying everybody over the age of 21 should be killed a la Logan's Run?
That is not a rhetorical question, Faith. I really want to know your answer to it.
Rrhain Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time. Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.
The narrator translated the written version of what the man said. You can't possibly know anything different.
Faith, just because *you* don't know Swedish doesn't mean nobody else does.
I don't see any reason to trust you over the Swedish-speaking narrator of that video, who was translating a written text of a speech given by the ex-prime minister. Perhaps you have a different speech in mind.
quote:Gateway Pundit (TGP) is a pro-Trump conservative political (blog) website founded by Jim Hoft after the United States presidential election, 2004. The website is known for publishing falsehoods and spreading hoaxes.
I can read that only marginally more easily than the white version but I get the gist of it. I don't know why you'd think a chart like that would mean much to me. Perhaps the basic scheme is accurate enough, but what matters to me is which ones are trustworthy, and the MSM definitely are not, or those on the liberal side of center. Those are the "fake news" from my point of view.. The fake news attack on Trump is understood by his supporters to BE the fake news.
The MSM is the fake news. They are trying to get some of our favorite sources banned of course because they don't believe in free speech unless it's their free speech, so they can continue to twist information about Trump without being bothered by those of us who see through them.
Rather than liberal and conservative news sources these days should be categorized as fake news or not, as I've laid out above.
I'm not familiar with Gateway Pundit, but I can assure you that your simply calling its author the stupidest man in the world makes me suspect he must have something important to say. At the very least I would think you should supply an example or two to defend your claim.
quote:But despite all this stiff competition, Jim Hoft (aka Gateway Pundit) stands out as uniquely incompetent. Hoft runs with (or spawns) almost every inane story that bubbles up in the conservative blogosphere, has proven that he has absolutely no vetting process for the sources he cites, and apparently has a hard time with basic reading comprehension.
™ Version 4.2
(1)