Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 115 (8734 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-27-2017 4:33 PM
456 online now:
Greatest I am, jar, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Tangle, Theodoric, ThinAirDesigns (7 members, 449 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: timtak
Post Volume:
Total: 802,024 Year: 6,630/21,208 Month: 2,391/2,634 Week: 54/525 Day: 29/25 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
...
56789
10
Author Topic:   What Benefits Are Only Available Through God?
ringo
Member
Posts: 12820
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 136 of 144 (800869)
03-01-2017 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by Stile
03-01-2017 1:07 PM


Re: Why I try to Help Others
Stile writes:

And if "I like his tie" is your reason for voting for him.. then that's a conscious reason.


Is it? Or is it just the part of your reason that you're conscious of?

Stile writes:

And "rationalize" is different from "conscious decision."


It is. And most of what you call "conscious" reasoning is likely post facto rationalization.

Stile writes:

It is quite possible for science to prove that there is no unconscious component required in order to make a conscious decision.
Just as it's quite possible for science to prove that there is no toothpaste component required in order to run a basic combustible engine.


That's a dishonest analogy. We can all imagine an experiment to run a combustion engine without toothpaste. But is an experiment to run thought without unconscious inputs even possible? Isn't it in the same realm as running an experiment to find God?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by Stile, posted 03-01-2017 1:07 PM Stile has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by Stile, posted 03-01-2017 2:39 PM ringo has responded

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 2848
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 137 of 144 (800878)
03-01-2017 2:39 PM
Reply to: Message 136 by ringo
03-01-2017 2:14 PM


Re: Why I try to Help Others
ringo writes:

Is it? Or is it just the part of your reason that you're conscious of?

When the science gets down to being able to determine this, you'll have your answer.
For now, though, we can only go on what we perceive.

I perceive what's going on in my head to be the way I'm describing.

Can I be wrong? Of course.
Can I be right? That too, is a valid possibility.

It is. And most of what you call "conscious" reasoning is likely post facto rationalization.

No, it's not. It's basic conscious decision making.

ringo writes:

Stile writes:

It is quite possible for science to prove that there is no unconscious component required in order to make a conscious decision.
Just as it's quite possible for science to prove that there is no toothpaste component required in order to run a basic combustible engine.


That's a dishonest analogy. We can all imagine an experiment to run a combustion engine without toothpaste. But is an experiment to run thought without unconscious inputs even possible?

Ha ha. You're absolutely right. Those two lines alone are a dishonest analogy.

One should rightly note that the science hasn't reached the point where we can say this definitively yet.
However, one should also note that such a thing definitely is theoretically possible, as long as the science doesn't run into any psychological "dark matter"-ish issues. And, even then, science can make progress, it just may require a paradigm shift and some more time.

Oh, wait... what did I write in that post again, directly above the part you're quoting and calling dishonest? Let's see:

Stile writes:

As of yet, it's unknown (becase the science isn't there).

However, theoretically, of course this is possible.

It is quite possible for science to prove that there is no unconscious component required in order to make a conscious decision.
Just as it's quite possible for science to prove that there is no toothpaste component required in order to run a basic combustible engine.

Message 135

I added the bolding and italics this time to make it a bit more obvious

ringo writes:

Isn't it in the same realm as running an experiment to find God?

Possibly.

But, again, the science isn't there yet.
Of course, with God, the indication is that the science will never get there. As there's nothing to test, and no progress is currently being made.
However, with consciousness... the science IS making current progress with much to test and attempt to understand. So, no... it does not seem to be in the same realm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by ringo, posted 03-01-2017 2:14 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by ringo, posted 03-01-2017 3:06 PM Stile has responded

    
ringo
Member
Posts: 12820
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 138 of 144 (800880)
03-01-2017 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by Stile
03-01-2017 2:39 PM


Re: Why I try to Help Others
Stile writes:

However, with consciousness... the science IS making current progress with much to test and attempt to understand.


And it seems to be going in the opposite direction from what you claim. The unconscious mind seems to have a lot more influence than we used to think.

Of course its possible that science will eventually disprove evolution and germ theory and the Big Bang....


This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by Stile, posted 03-01-2017 2:39 PM Stile has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by Stile, posted 03-02-2017 8:44 AM ringo has responded

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 2848
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 139 of 144 (800943)
03-02-2017 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 138 by ringo
03-01-2017 3:06 PM


Re: Why I try to Help Others
ringo writes:

And it seems to be going in the opposite direction from what you claim. The unconscious mind seems to have a lot more influence than we used to think.

How so?

I think conscious decisions are possible.
I also think most decisions are unconscious.

This seems to be exactly what the science is saying right now... and exactly where it is leading.

So, which part is opposite to the direction I'm claiming?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by ringo, posted 03-01-2017 3:06 PM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by ringo, posted 03-02-2017 10:56 AM Stile has responded

    
ringo
Member
Posts: 12820
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.6


(1)
Message 140 of 144 (800969)
03-02-2017 10:56 AM
Reply to: Message 139 by Stile
03-02-2017 8:44 AM


Re: Why I try to Help Others
Stile writes:

I think conscious decisions are possible.
I also think most decisions are unconscious.

This seems to be exactly what the science is saying right now... and exactly where it is leading.

So, which part is opposite to the direction I'm claiming?


You said that FULLY conscious decisions are possible. Show us where science is leading in that direction.

On the other hand, we have science showing us that what we thought was conscious has a lot of unconscious influences:

Subliminal advertising. All advertising, for that matter. We don't decide fully consciously to buy the beer that promises us chicks in bikinis.

Blondes are more likely to be acquitted by juries too.

Polygraph. Your body betrays what your mind is really thinking.

Body language in general.

Can you decide fully consciously who you fall in love with?

Can you choose fully consciously to believe in Zeus?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by Stile, posted 03-02-2017 8:44 AM Stile has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by Stile, posted 03-02-2017 3:32 PM ringo has responded

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 2848
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004
Member Rating: 1.9


(1)
Message 141 of 144 (801017)
03-02-2017 3:32 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by ringo
03-02-2017 10:56 AM


Re: Why I try to Help Others
ringo writes:

You said that FULLY conscious decisions are possible. Show us where science is leading in that direction.

I don't think you understand.

I stopped using the FULLY because it is redundant and therefore unnecessary. Not because conscious decisions are coerced by some-level-of unconscious desires.

Here's the basic definitions from the scientific/academic side of things:

Conscious Motivation

Book Definition: Having the desire to engage in an activity and being aware of the desire.

  • Knowing that you are motivated to do something.
  • Choosing to do something and knowing exactly why you want to.
  • Deciding to take part in an activity and recognizing your interest in it.
  • Doing something you like and know you are doing it because you want to.

That's exactly what I was talking about when I used the term "FULLY conscious."

For reference, here's the other one, too:

Unconscious Motivation

Book Definition: Having a desire to engage in an activity but being consciously unaware of the desire.

  • Wanting to do something but being unaware why you want to do it.
  • Not knowing why you are motivated to do something.
  • May not be aware of the drives or motives underlying their behavior.
  • Preforming an action and not knowing that you are doing it.
  • Engaging in an activity and not knowing why you partcipated in it.

The idea that people used to think they made 80% conscious decisions and 20% unconscious... but not we know it's much closer to the other way around (or so... anyway... I just made up those numbers)... This shift doesn't indicate that conscious decision are going to disappear completely.

It's like living in the mid-continent plains before you new much about world geography. Maybe you thought the world was 70% land and 30% water... but it's actually more accurately the opposite direction.

This idea by no means indicates that science will one day find that "FULLY land" areas do not exist...
Quite the contrary, the science pretty much accepts that "FULLY land" areas exist... just not as much as water-covered areas.

Same with conscious motivations.
The science accepts that "FULLY conscious choices" (aka "conscious motivations") exist... just not as much as unconscious motivations.

Science is only heading "in the direction" of the vague ideas I've discussed on why we have conscious motivations....
But on the topic of the existence of conscious motivation (what I've been calling "FULLY conscious" decisions..) the science is already there.

Unless you can provide some reviewed literature to the contrary? I'm not able to find any.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by ringo, posted 03-02-2017 10:56 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by ringo, posted 03-03-2017 10:48 AM Stile has responded

    
ringo
Member
Posts: 12820
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 142 of 144 (801107)
03-03-2017 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by Stile
03-02-2017 3:32 PM


Re: Why I try to Help Others
Stile writes:

I stopped using the FULLY because it is redundant and therefore unnecessary.


And I thought you dropped it because the position was untenable.

Stile writes:

"Choosing to do something and knowing exactly why you want to."


That's what I'm saying doesn't happen. As long as there are unconscious inputs, you can't claim to know "exactly" why you want something.

Stile writes:

This shift doesn't indicate that conscious decision are going to disappear completely.


I'm saying the opposite - that the UNconscious component isn't going to disappear completely.

Stile writes:

This idea by no means indicates that science will one day find that "FULLY land" areas do not exist...


Another bad analogy. Of course "fully land" areas DO NOT exist. They all have a water table. It's just that sometimes you're not conscious of it.

Stile writes:

The science accepts that "FULLY conscious choices" (aka "conscious motivations") exist...


Only if "fully" doesn't mean fully.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Stile, posted 03-02-2017 3:32 PM Stile has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Stile, posted 03-05-2017 10:18 AM ringo has responded

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 2848
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 143 of 144 (801343)
03-05-2017 10:18 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by ringo
03-03-2017 10:48 AM


What's the difference?
I think we've been over this many times already.

And this is as far as I'm willing to continue along these lines for this thread.
I think I've explained why I do good things, and also shown how the science of modern psychology supports my position.
You seem to disagree.

There is a discussion to be had here... but it would be more fitting under a topic of "where does morality come from" or a new topic on the understanding of modern psychology where decision making is concerned... or maybe even a thread about whether or not reality is strictly determined on the level of physics. But, regardless of where it should be... it's getting too far off the topic to be here.

Getting back on topic, where this stream of thought stemmed from, my original question is still unanswered.
If anyone has any comment or explanation for the following question, please feel free to respond:

Stile writes:

Can (anyone) explain how me trying to help others is different from Jesus trying to help others?

Message 98

Or continue to discuss anything else that relates to some sort of specific difference only available through God or a particular religion.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by ringo, posted 03-03-2017 10:48 AM ringo has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by ringo, posted 03-05-2017 1:20 PM Stile has acknowledged this reply

    
ringo
Member
Posts: 12820
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 144 of 144 (801351)
03-05-2017 1:20 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by Stile
03-05-2017 10:18 AM


Re: What's the difference?
Stile writes:

If anyone has any comment or explanation for the following question, please feel free to respond: Can (anyone) explain how me trying to help others is different from Jesus trying to help others?


Riggamortis answered your question and I ran with the ball.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Stile, posted 03-05-2017 10:18 AM Stile has acknowledged this reply

  
Prev1
...
56789
10
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017