Questions based on a plain and simple reading of the US Constitution

The photograph is not lying, the people in the photograph (well many of them) are lying on the ground. There are cops in the picture but the Black Live Matter folk killing the cops is in your imagination.Have there been cops killed? Yes.As many cops killed as black people killed by cops? Nope.Is killing cops right? Nope.Is anger by the black population against cops reasonable? Absolutely.But a small question Faith?Do you understand that a plain and simple reading of the US Constitution protects the Rights of the Black Lives Matter supporters to peacefully gather, associate together, protest governmental misconduct and even lie down on the tracks?

Again, marc, try a little honesty.First no one here does not accept the fact that Trump is President.Second, more voters voted for Clinton than voted for Trump.

Which is why in the OP I included the section on Civil Lawsuits.

quote:

---

Article [VII] (Amendment 7 - Civil Trials)

​

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

---

If deportation should cause damage greater than $20.00 can a civil trial by jury be demanded?Note, that this is part of the US Constitution even marc seems to think legitimate.

marc, you do know that the EPA is a Conservative Republican creation don't you?But then again, the EPA has absolutely nothing to do with the simple reading of the US Constitution.

And you and Trump and the current crop of fascists want to return to raping and pillaging the environment.And in case you failed to notice it the Obamacare was passed by Congress just as the enabling acts for the EPA were passed by Congress under Rio9chard Nixon.Sorry Charley but there is no evidence the EPA has ever become a power grabbing tool for liberal Democrats but lots of evidence that the environment in the US (as well as worker safety and general environmental concerns) were beginng to show improvements.Now the current crop of Republican Fascists are busy trying to take us back to pre-WWI status.And it still has nothing to do with the topic.

Well I did answer one and I have no problem answering two either.Today's Conservatives would not make a pipmple on a real conservatives ass. Today what we see in the Republican Party (and I am speaking as a long term Republican) are simply ignorant fascists.And no, the EPA has never been either in opposition or support of any political party up until now. It is only now under the current Republican fascists that it is being co-opted to serve a political as opposed to an environmental purpose.

Don't bother. No one cares since it has NOTHING to do with the US Constitution.

And once again marc, that is simply a lie.You simply seem incapable of ever telling the truth.Nowhere have I suggested there was a constitutional authority for as much immigration as possible. Rather the topic as laid out in the OP says that people within the US have certain rights and those rights are outlined in the US Constitution.