Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,358 Year: 3,615/9,624 Month: 486/974 Week: 99/276 Day: 27/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fake polls, fake news
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


(2)
Message 407 of 710 (800674)
02-26-2017 7:41 PM


Bare Links
There's been a lot of disagreement about the videos, but though I'm not moderating this thread it's worth noting that there's little clarity about what the evidence in the videos is. Videos are like links and excerpts and shouldn't appear by themselves. They should be accompanied by arguments and evidence in one's own words. For videos longer than maybe a half minute or so, times for the relevant information should be provided.
--Percy

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 453 of 710 (800886)
03-01-2017 3:38 PM


Analysis of New York Times Article
Since no supporters of Trump's claims of "fake news" are offering any actual evidential support I thought I'd help them out by conducting a brief review of this article from today's New York Times: Trump Offers Up a More Hopeful Vision. I'll be looking to see if the article contains any biased or fake portions.
quote:
President Trump, in his first address to a joint session of Congress, defended his tumultuous presidency on Tuesday and said he was eager to reach across party lines and put aside trivial fights to help ordinary Americans.
Given the chaotic immigration ban and the fear he's sowed in the immigrant community, the concerns he's sparked in NATO, the insults to foreign cities, countries and heads of state, and the confusion he's caused about health care, tumultuous seems a more than fair characterization of the Trump presidency thus far. It must at least be agreed that his presidency has been very non-traditional.
quote:
But he raised new questions about his policy priorities and how he plans to achieve them, especially on immigration.
Only hours before his address, Mr. Trump had broken from his tough immigration stance in remarks at the White House, suggesting that legal status be granted to millions of undocumented immigrants who have not committed serious crimes. Many of Mr. Trump’s core supporters had denounced that approach as amnesty during the campaign.
But in his speech, Mr. Trump never mentioned legalizing undocumented people and over all held to the tough-on-immigration theme of his campaign.
Mentioning immigration compromise in his briefing with news anchors and then leaving it out of his SOTU address certainly does raise questions.
quote:
But in contrast with the dark themes of his inaugural address, Mr. Trump’s speech to Congress was a more optimistic vision of America and what he called the promises ahead.
The SOTU address was much clearly more optimistic than the inaugural with its many dark references to stealing and carnage and the red blood of patriots and ravages and destruction and terrorism and so forth.
quote:
Although Mr. Trump’s presidency has been defined by executive orders and pronouncements, his speech appeared to be an attempt to open a new phase and reflected his need for cooperation from Congress.
This seems an accurate assessment.
quote:
The president has yet to propose major legislation to achieve his goals, with members of his cabinet and senior staff members divided over key elements of tax and health plans, and congressional Republicans split on how to structure them. By this point in his presidency, Mr. Obama had established an active if not always friendly working relationship with a Democratic Congress, having signed into law a $787 billion package of spending and tax cuts intended to stabilize the economy.
This is a clearly biased paragraph that goes well beyond factual reporting to make comparisons with the previous president who faced far more urgent economic problems than those faced today and so had to move rapidly.
quote:
Mr. Trump laid out the broad outlines of a health care overhaul that papered over divisions among Republicans about how to structure it, calling for a plan that uses tax credits and tax-advantaged savings accounts to help Americans buy insurance, and promising a stable transition from the existing system.
This is just referring to the differences of opinion among Republicans on health care, ranging from complete repeal of Obamacare without replacement all the way to keeping much of it.
quote:
Nor did Mr. Trump criticize one of his favorite foils, the fake news media.
This seems an unnecessary jab at a time when the president has just taken a very positive step toward a more traditional and presidential style.
quote:
The speech reflected the war Mr. Trump is fighting with himself and his inner circle.
Characterizing policy differences within the administration as "war" seems unnecessarily harsh.
There's much more in the article, of course, but those were the parts that I thought could be challenged as biased. They was not, as far as I could tell, any fake or incorrect information in the article.
--Percy

Replies to this message:
 Message 460 by Faith, posted 03-01-2017 8:24 PM Percy has replied
 Message 468 by Faith, posted 03-01-2017 10:51 PM Percy has replied
 Message 471 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2017 5:11 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 475 of 710 (800937)
03-02-2017 8:27 AM
Reply to: Message 473 by Rrhain
03-02-2017 6:00 AM


Re: Analysis of New York Times Article
Rrhain writes:
You mean you don't know? The order is not merely to "deport criminals." Instead, it is to deport anybody "charged."
It's important to note that the original order applied to everyone from those seven countries, including those with green cards.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 473 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2017 6:00 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 477 by Faith, posted 03-02-2017 8:35 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 505 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2017 4:59 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 479 of 710 (800941)
03-02-2017 8:42 AM
Reply to: Message 460 by Faith
03-01-2017 8:24 PM


Re: Analysis of New York Times Article
Faith writes:
Oh I'm not particularly bothered by the word "tumultuous" but blaming on him what is really media-generated tumult,...
The entire media, including the outlets you like, reported on these things. The tumult in the Trump administration is caused by Trump himself. Reporting events is a result of the events, not a cause of them. You've got it backwards.
I'm not up to reading your whole post right now I'm afraid so the above is just my initial reaction.
Gee, too bad, you missed the portions I thought biased.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 460 by Faith, posted 03-01-2017 8:24 PM Faith has not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


(1)
Message 484 of 710 (800948)
03-02-2017 8:55 AM
Reply to: Message 468 by Faith
03-01-2017 10:51 PM


Re: Analysis of New York Times Article
Faith writes:
I see I can't answer the rest of your post because I didn't hear the speech. Comments I've heard today -- not a lot of that even -- are quite positive about it, and the NYT account is even pretty positive for them.
I think you've mistaken the purpose of my post. It was to neither complement nor criticize Trump, but to take the lead article from a mainstream media outlet and review it for bias and fake news. I found two instances of mild bias and no instances of fake or false news.
But I agree that there was a great deal about the speech to be positive about. Trump delivered a traditional, presidential and largely successful and positive SOTU address.
I will mention one of the biggest gripes I have about media coverage these days, the word "undocumented" for illegal aliens, and leaving off the term "illegal" from "immigrants." That's deep-dyed fake news IMO.
The term "undocumented" is used when it is more accurate. For someone discovered without documentation, "undocumented" is a fact while "illegal" is a possibly incorrect conclusion. It's like the term "alleged perpetrator" that police use because they're talking prior to establishment of any guilt or innocence.
Speaking of illegal immigration, I have nothing against developing a pathway to legality for those who deserve it. Maybe Trump didn't bring it up in the speech because he hasn't had time to think it through.
The idea appeared to spring off the top of his head during a meeting with news anchors, so it's very likely true that he hasn't had time to think it through, nor vet it with his staff or the relevant agencies, which he should have done before even mentioning it. Poor impulse control.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 468 by Faith, posted 03-01-2017 10:51 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 509 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2017 5:28 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 496 of 710 (800986)
03-02-2017 1:03 PM


Where's the Fake News?
While we continue to wait for actual examples of "fake news" from the mainstream media, here as potential candidates are the top few headlines from today's New York Times:
If anyone finds anything "fake" in any of these articles please bring it the thread's attention.
--Percy

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 504 of 710 (801019)
03-02-2017 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 502 by Faith
03-02-2017 2:06 PM


Re: deportations
Faith writes:
NoNukes writes:
No, your lack of awareness does not leave Obama as the source. Isn't it quite obvious that your own ignorance has no effect on reality?
I've often wondered how you ever got to be a lawyer with your logic handicap.
The error in logic is all yours, but could you perhaps divert time from issuing spurious insults to providing some support for your contention that the mainstream media is "fake news"? So far what we mostly have is that if Trump and Faith don't like it, it's fake.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 502 by Faith, posted 03-02-2017 2:06 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 513 by Faith, posted 03-02-2017 9:27 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 508 of 710 (801025)
03-02-2017 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 505 by Rrhain
03-02-2017 4:59 PM


Re: Analysis of New York Times Article
Rrhain writes:
I think you're confusing the new policy regarding deportation of immigrants with the Muslim ban.
Nope.
You're trying to find the fleck of gold in the mountain of excrement.
You're trying to make a single characterization fit everything Trump does.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 505 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2017 4:59 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 512 by Rrhain, posted 03-02-2017 6:01 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


(4)
Message 529 of 710 (801091)
03-03-2017 8:10 AM
Reply to: Message 513 by Faith
03-02-2017 9:27 PM


Re: deportations
Faith writes:
Percy writes:
The error in logic is all yours, but could you perhaps divert time from issuing spurious insults to providing some support for your contention that the mainstream media is "fake news"?
The insult is not spurious...
Of course the insult was spurious, and unnecessary and against the Forum Guidelines.
...and no to your question.
If you're not going to defend the main premise of your thread that the mainstream media is "fake news", then what is the point?
You've said enough offensive stuff to deserve tp be ignored.
I haven't said anything offensive. You just find the truth offensive.
It was obviously not my ignorance of Trump's actions that left Obama as the source of the actions and to twist it into that is just another insult to ME that I'm rightly objecting to.
It's obvious to everyone else here that you spoke out of ignorance. Reality isn't what you make up in your own mind. When you make a mistake, own up to it.
By the way, I'm curious, how is it that you're able to read the black on white lettering of news outlets when it's something you post yourself (like the opinion piece you just linked to in Message 518, Trump ignored first rule of crisis management come clean and he’s paying the price), but not anything anybody else posts? Since virtually all news outlets post black on white lettering, how do you read any news at all? Perhaps this explains why you seem unaware of so much.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 513 by Faith, posted 03-02-2017 9:27 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 537 by Faith, posted 03-03-2017 11:52 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 606 of 710 (801536)
03-07-2017 11:10 AM


Trump Tweets Falsely Again
This morning Trump tweeted that "122 vicious prisoners, released by the Obama Administration from Gitmo, have returned to the battlefield." Just one problem: most of those former Gitmo prisoners were released by George W. Bush. Read all about it: Trump hits Obama again, this time with false claims about Gitmo detainees
Probably Trump read something misleading at Breitbart again and then put fingers in gear without thinking or checking. One has to wonder how many of his opinions are based upon false beliefs.
--Percy

Replies to this message:
 Message 607 by Theodoric, posted 03-07-2017 11:32 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 608 by nwr, posted 03-07-2017 4:18 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 610 by Phat, posted 03-07-2017 4:30 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


(4)
Message 702 of 710 (802125)
03-12-2017 10:20 AM


More Fake News
The most recent jobs report was very positive, and Trump tweeted enthusiastically about it: "Great news. We are only just beginning. Together, we are going to #MAGA [Make America Great Again]!"
But up until his inauguration Trump dismissed the job reports as "totally fiction." See a list of the many times he has deprecated the jobs report as meaningless: 19 times Trump called jobs numbers ‘fake’ before they made him look good
Once again Trump makes clear that his definition of fake news is any report not favorable to him. Whether its true or not (and so far the evidence is that it *is* true when it's from a major news outlet like the New York Times, Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc.) doesn't matter to him. He's a propagandist of the first rank.
--Percy

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22475
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 705 of 710 (802935)
03-22-2017 8:20 AM


Closing Remarks
No evidence of fake or false news by the mainstream media was identified in this thread. Obviously Trump's accusations of "fake news" only apply to news not favorable to him.
Concerning polls, a recent Gallup poll had Trump at his lowest approval rating yet of 37%, and the Rasmussen poll that tracks a different demographic group has tracked the Gallup poll, dropping to 45% at roughly the same time. Trump's approval rating is slowly recovering from his disastrous last week - yesterday Gallup was at 39% and Rasmussen was at 50%. There seems nothing fake nor fraudulent about either poll.
--Percy

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024