How do you define the word Evolution?

He doesn't. It's a subjective quality like beauty.

Hey, ICANT, fun fact: we haven't yet looked at all the fossils in the fossil record. Yeah, that's right, crazy though it may seem we haven't split open all the sedimentary rocks and looked inside them. No it isn't. That's actually called something you made up.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

You made that up. You made that up. You made that up. You made that up. You made that up.

It is a perfectly adequate answer to things you made up and asserted without so much as a pretense of providing evidence. I have read the Origin of Species, and moreover understood it. The ubiquity of competition does not necessarily imply that any of the selection pressures will be adaptive rather than conservative.Here's something Darwin actually said in the Origin of Species: "The period during which each species underwent modification, though long as measured by years, was probably short in comparison with that during which it remained without undergoing any change." Heritable changes in a population.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Is your ridiculous nonsense about the fossil record on topic?

"It is mere rubbish thinking at present of the origin of life; one might as well think of the origin of matter." --- Darwin, letter to Hooker, 1871.

Why do you bother to drool out this stupid lie to an audience of people all of whom know that you're lying? Whom do you hope to deceive?

Why do you keep telling this lie? Whom do you hope to deceive?

No, you silly liar, they do not say that.

And winning Nobel Prizes, they do that quite a lot.Meanwhile creationists make fools of themselves on the internet. Ah well, each to his own.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Were you literally asleep during science class?

No. No. Stop making stuff up. But the word "macroevolution" is already being used for things that people can test and establish as a fact. If you want to talk about a different concept, find a different word.

You're claiming Einstein was a "real Christian Scientist"? Do you ever tell the truth? Let's take the 72 Nobel Prize winners who acted as amici curiae in Edwards v. Aguilard, and who said that "the evolutionary history of organisms has been as extensively tested and as thoroughly corroborated as any biological concept."Edwards v. Aguillard: Amicus Curiae Brief of 72 Nobel Laureates

Hello, earth to David? The 72 scientists in question all got their prizes in either physics, chemistry, or medicine. As you could have found out by clicking on the link.Try to be less of a damn fool, would you?Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Thus far, creationists have been unable to reproduce Jacob's results, probably because the person who wrote Genesis knew bugger-all about genetics. Y'mean like humans are devolved defective monkeys?