I want to renew this topic and add some more rules concerning behavior in this thread. Our old format was Post Of The Month, but i feel that if anyone sees a post that is too good to be missed, showcase it here. Suggested Message Format:
Author: Author's Name Forum: Forum where posted Thread: Thread title Message #: Number and Link to the nominated message
It would be tidy and helpful if you copy/paste the format above.
Any off topic comments or excessive comments by anyone other than the author of the topics nominated will be deleted.
If anyone agrees with a POTM nomination, simply click the like button. If you disagree with a POTM, keep quiet about it. Here are the 2016 nominations so far:
1) Nominated by myself:
Author: Rrhain Forum: Coffee House Thread: After Palmyra ISIS Targets Monuments on U.S. Soil Message #:53
********************************************************** Our thespian and wordsmith Rrhain did what I thought was a bangup job on this post. The thread contained many points of view regarding symbolism, authoritarianism, fascism and free expression. The author of the thread, Jon, started with this observation:
quote:From petitioning university presidents to silence political speech to the destruction of historical sites thought heretical, the Fascist Left has been pulling pages right out of the books of some of history's greatest turds in their effort to shelter themselves and others from a world they find distasteful and - oh no! - offensive; to erase everything that does not align with their worldview.
In my opinion, Rrhain made a strong case for what the Confederate Flag represents. The Comic he posted was the best part! Two thumbs up! ******************************************************* 2) Nominated by coyote:
Author: dwise1 Forum: Geology & The Great Flood Thread: How does a flood ... Message #:Message 86
********************************************** 3) Nominated by jar:
I might also add that if anyone finds a really good post from older threads and you are reading it for the first time (or rereading it, as I often do) go ahead and submit it here as well. Just remember to keep things neat and tidy and use the suggested format.
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. –RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." –Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith
Author: Genomicus Forum: The Great Debate: Thread: Molecular Population Genetics and Diversity in Evolution Message #: Message 15
Well laid out presentation, with examples, nicely organized, well supported with evidence, and conveyed on an understandable level. An example of how a science based great debate ought to be carried out.
I see at least one other post by Genomicus in the same thread of similarly high quality. Nicely done.
Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. Martin Luther King
If there are no stupid questions, then what kind of questions do stupid people ask? Do they get smart just in time to ask questions? Scott Adams
This is the most rational argument against life, and specifically human life, being a miracle of creation because it is found on a planet that seems quite suited for the life that lives on it.
He argues that it would be far more miraculous if we lived on a planet hostile to life.
This is one of those things that I would like to print out on a card that I carry in my wallet to whip out and use as a rebuttal the next time someone uses the "Life is a miracle because Earth is perfect argument", with proper citation of course.
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie
If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy
kbertsche, for book reference, at "OEC vs YEC Issues"
Author: kbertsche Forum: Geology and the Great Flood Thread: OEC vs YEC Issues Message #: 194
Not so much a great message, but I thought this book reference needed to be flagged somehow.
Quoting his entire message:
For Faith and any other YECs who may be lurking here who are wondering about dating, I highly recommend Dan Wonderly's book "God's Time Records in Ancient Sediments". Dan was a geology professor for a short time at Grace College (John Whitcomb was on faculty at the seminary). Dan did not have expertise in radiometric dating, so his book focuses exclusively on non-radiometric evidence for an old earth. The book is a bit dated now, but is still quite good.
Presented in a rather clumsy manner, with links to individual pages. But my impression from a brief look was that this was a pretty good discourse on some basic geology.
Author: Ringo Forum: Geology and the Great Flood Thread: Glenn Morton's Evidence Examined Message #: 412
In a way, the OE theory is incidental to finding oil - but to find oil it is necessary to understand how the rocks formed, how they changed after they were formed, etc. Finding oil comes from that understanding and so does the realization that the rocks must be old.
In my opinion, the essence of the downfall of young Earthism, among those having a geology knowledge.
Tangle, at "Gay Marriage as an attack on Christianity"
Author: Tangle Forum: Coffee House Thread: Gay Marriage as an attack on Christianity Message #: 208
In support of the (for lack of a better phrase) "don't go too far when promoting pro-LGBT policy" theme.
From the message end:
They apply to everybody. We all get annoyed by the behaviour of others. Some things are worth the effort of doing something about it, somethings aren't. As the the lawyers say, 'having principles can be expensive.' Sometimes it's better to just shrug it off.
I'm not attempting to tell individuals what to do - if you want to kick back at the bigots now that you can, go ahead, it makes for great reading. Everytime it happens I think great, bagged another bastard. But at some point it's going to look like you've got a real chip on your collective shoulders - deserved or otherwise.
If you want to win the hearts of the nation you've just conquered on the battlefield, it's generally thought a bad idea to bayonet their wounded. The word magnanimous springs to mind.
There is more quote and response at the source message.
Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - John Kenneth Galbraith
"Yesterday on Fox News, commentator Glenn Beck said that he believes President Obama is a racist. To be fair, every time you watch Glenn Beck, it does get a little easier to hate white people." - Conan O'Brien
"I know a little about a lot of things, and a lot about a few things, but I'm highly ignorant about everything." - Moose