|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Ten Laws of Creationism and Intelligent Design | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
The biblical record is clear and concise, reasonable and rational when considering science and mathematics, history, and world events from the BEGINNING.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
The biblical record is clear and concise, reasonable and rational when considering science and mathematics, history, and world events from the BEGINNING.
It just takes some time and study before you can see it. Evolution is easy to understand because it is all based on luck and chance, if given enough shakes of the dice, to eventually come up with an amazing combination that just happens to fit in perfectly. Theres no mathematics to evolution, no science of real beneficial mutations, and no timeline that doesn;t get changed time after time.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
All three of your examples are provable, as the Flood is true history. (And can be proven mathematically to be significant) Evolutionists claim that Dinosaurs were struck by comets is unprovable and almost on the verge of complete insanity and totally unscientific.
Science and math and design prove creationism. Luck and chance prove nothing except that this concept must be forced on students of real science so there basis is in false science. Evolution does not abandon its premises of luck and chance even though it has never been proven and they have no evidence. They still go on with it because it is their religion. I back science, and rational thinking rather than the lucky chances and so called beneficial mutations put forth by religious evolutionists. Science shows design, laws were not created by random chance, no laws are evolving. Science backs creationism as creationism shows design. Evolution is without design or purpose or clarity, just miraculous miracles of chance and luck.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Actually I am very rational, Please comment on the subject rather than the writer. Be objective rather than subjective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
As a scientist, I have an obligation to put forth mathematics that you evolutionists do NOT have, and evidence that you evolutionists do not have.
Evolutionists almost never answer questions, hardly ever, they have no answers, so can only try to ridicule, or say they belong to science, even though they have no science. If evolutionists had proofs they would have put them forward years ago. They have no missing links, they have no transition species, they have nothing. But it is their right to have their religion, I just wish they wouldnt force their religion on their captive students. Allow them to think. Give them the decision rather than via evolutionary intimidation and force. If you have specific areas of interest in science or history, a specific title and thread would be best for its discussion Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Someone HERE stated that there is mathematics associated with 'evolutionary' theory. Never heard anyone ever state that before.
Evolution is purely a supposed chance situation where sufficient magical beneficial mutations take place to develop a supposed better species by luck and chance. Evolutionists get this faith of the almost insanely impossible by sheer chance and luck, that their impossibility could be possible if given enough time. Statistically its impossible but they hang onto their faith and say just wait another million years, or trillion years, or *********. Magical beneficial mutations have never been shown to develop complex organisms or simple ones as simple ones are extremely complex as well. But go ahead and give your math and equations, your claim needs to be proven and substantiated...... otherwise people might question your theory even further..
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
No problem brethren because we are all brethren with the same basic DNA design...... brothers by design.
Sure, just ask in proposed topics that you admit that evolution has no mathematical basis and you want to see creational mathematics proven. As for evolution's denial of the worldwide flood, Yes definiterly I can absolutely prove mathematically that it was perfectly timed, in world history, beyond a shadow of a doubt. History is by design, the future is by design its called prophecy. No problem. These things were not done in secret, all things are meant to be revealed, just do the math. Be scientific rather than mere theorists or religionists. Just go to Proposed Topics and by your demand or request I shall come and answer your questions, if allowed to do so. But do start off by admitting evolution again has no mathematical basis, statistical basis in its luck and chance, and then I can present my evidence with hyperlinks etc.... just request this information. Be an honest searcher, and search. Seek and ye shall find, says the Lord of Creation, we are told to use our God given brains, rather than them just filling up the vacuum above. Genesis as mentioned is very scientific, as a basis point... the details follow in other books, and in the created world of the microcosm and macrocosm, etc etc etc etc ...Evolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Herebedragons.... not a problem, I realize this is an evolution discussion board, and seldom if ever do evolutionists feel compelled to come up with any answers, but sure NOW that I am cleared to post on the science boards, I can answer your queries and you can get answers if you are honest or if you are scientific. Science is about laws and design, not about conjecture. Just post on the Proposed TOPICS board what you are interested in finding out, and why you haven;t come to any conclusions via evolution as yet. And then I can try to answer your query.
I do dislike one sided debates, when in the real world, debates are two sided, mutual questioning and answering. You know what I mean ? Do see see my signature for further details Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.Evolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
"""Jar...when you write..I'm sorry but that is simply a really stupid assertion. Neither of the two mutually exclusive creation myths are scientific or accurate and both are fully refuted by actual evidence and the thing called reality. To claim Genesis is scientific or accurate is as absurd as claiming either of the two mutually exclusive Biblical flood myths actually happened.""""
I would suggest, you answering a matter before you hear it and search it out, is a rather stupid assertion. Now lets get back to this topic ... As design is not anywhere in evolutionary theory, its premise is that all things evolved in time (billions and trillions of years) and just happened by chance to fit together and work together in harmony by luck and chance. So rather than design being a myth, I would suggest to you that evolution is a total myth, with absolutely no evidence. I mean if there was evidence, why didn't they teach us any of it in university and why did they never allow anyone to question them. But if you like that as a TOPIC, please go to Proposed Topics and ask that we discuss this educational censorship and lobotomy of new minds. Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.Evolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Coyote, Nice pic of the receeding flood and how it gouged out the landscape, Actually the Grand Canyon, is a better example of the receeding flood, or up HERE you can literally see the mountain, with a sand plane, below into the valleys. Very conclusive.
Yes, the waters below, receeded downward and it took something like a year to receed.... Thanks for the pictorial confirmationEvolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Never seen any fossil evidence personally, I have seen a lot of artists depictions and imaginations, and frauds and counterfeits for the sake of further research funding.
But no there still are no missing links, but Yes, the worldwide flood did cause a lot of fossils to be scattered around. Birds becoming mammals becoming fishes, with spouts on the tops of their heads, as with mamalian whales... Nah I'm not buying it. But you can buy it if you like, as that is your freedom of choice. Not a problem. Genesis is literal.... starting a new proposed thread on Creation Day 1, with the creation of Light and LIGHT SPEED, wait for it if acceptable. Evolutionists can post how light was created, or always was, and ETERNAL if they choose to do so. Or they can just say, they have no idea. Either way... choice is theirs and ours.Evolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Dwise, please reframe from calling me a blithering idiot. Scientists try to be objective rather subjective. Name calling does not win you converts in the debate, or any debate. If anything it shows you have lost the debate..... and your opponent has won.
Creationism has laws, and principles. Evolution is based on luck and chance, and its statistical so called law is that eventually a lucky combination will produce itself by accident if given enough time. It can be condensed into the religious saying of, all things are possible with evolution, just give it or her enough time. If not a billion years, wait a trillion years. Design always wins over lack of design, always. Intelligence always wins over lack of intelligence.Evolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Caffeine, do read between your lines, as a theory of a theory gets wilder and wilder..... and the reason your so called mathematician type tried to come up with something is that evolutionary doctrine is as vaque and inaccurate and inexact as inexactness gets. Its is not RIGOROUS or in any way mathematical.
I love exactness, not inexactness and inexact probabilities given definitive parameters that never stay the same. Evolutionary theory is filled with too many maybes, could have, might have, possibily this or maybe possibly that, could have been a million years, maybe billion years, maybe trillion years. I love math and science and laws, not inexactness from the desperateEvolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Coyote, if you want the true history of the Flood, just start a new thread, on it and I shall answer. You can post your billions and trillions of years, and I can post my immensely smaller exact numbers.
Not a problem, just go to Proposed New Topics.... Herein we must stay on TOPIC, and further confirm the Ten Laws, somebody gave..... they sound pretty good to me, even though I never heard of them before. So we have confirmation. If you deny one, do so logically and rationally. ThanksEvolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2329 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Dr Adequate
As I love consistency and endurance and truthfulness, Yes I am a Christian Missionary, and have remained one since my graduation from University with a BSC...... even though the not so nice evolutionary professors tried to fail me for not believing their dogma. We can talk about that forced indocrination, ona NEW THREAD. And Yes, of course as a true scientist, I had to test and try out and experiemnt whether the principles and laws of the Lord are applicable. Its not mere talk and bluster as with evolutionary imaginations in a dream world, but real life, follwoing the precepts. It was proven, and confirmed. The Lords laws of love and life work and are proveable and repeatable, and viable. If you want to be truthful or find out, just try them out yourself personally. Got to fly.. Thanks for the response, but lets get back to confirming the Ten Laws of Creationism, that someone found.Evolution is not science and is pure religion, forced upon the young to ensure their faith in luck and chance rather than mathematics and design.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024