Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,851 Year: 4,108/9,624 Month: 979/974 Week: 306/286 Day: 27/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Ten Laws of Creationism and Intelligent Design
herebedragons
Member (Idle past 885 days)
Posts: 1517
From: Michigan
Joined: 11-22-2009


(2)
Message 32 of 75 (803845)
04-05-2017 10:38 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Davidjay
04-05-2017 8:12 AM


Re: Reading Genesis literally but not scientifically
All three of your examples are provable, as the Flood is true history. (And can be proven mathematically to be significant)
Interesting! Start a new thread over at 'Proposed New Topics' and present this statistical proof.
HBD

Whoever calls me ignorant shares my own opinion. Sorrowfully and tacitly I recognize my ignorance, when I consider how much I lack of what my mind in its craving for knowledge is sighing for... I console myself with the consideration that this belongs to our common nature. - Francesco Petrarca
"Nothing is easier than to persuade people who want to be persuaded and already believe." - another Petrarca gem.
Ignorance is a most formidable opponent rivaled only by arrogance; but when the two join forces, one is all but invincible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Davidjay, posted 04-05-2017 8:12 AM Davidjay has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Davidjay, posted 04-05-2017 10:57 AM herebedragons has replied

  
herebedragons
Member (Idle past 885 days)
Posts: 1517
From: Michigan
Joined: 11-22-2009


Message 33 of 75 (803850)
04-05-2017 10:52 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Davidjay
04-05-2017 8:18 AM


Re: Reading Genesis literally but not scientifically
As a scientist, I have an obligation to put forth mathematics that you evolutionists do NOT have, and evidence that you evolutionists do not have.
From what I have read thus far, all you have is bluster. Your statement that evolution doesn't rely on mathematics pretty much says to me that you have no scientific training, otherwise you would realize how dependent evolutionary biology is on mathematical concepts.
How about you take your arguments out of the 'free for all' forum and present them in one of the science forums so we can have a legitimate debate (full disclosure: I, personally, probably won't be able to participate all that much in the near future).
Advice about starting a new topic: keep the topic focused on a particular issue. Do not try to address every issue you have with evolutionary theory in one thread. For example: "Mathematical proof of a world-wide flood." That should be interesting!
If you have specific areas of interest in science or history, a specific title and thread would be best for its discussion
The ball is in your court. You are the one who has the scientific training and expertise to disprove evolutionary theory. Put up your best argument in a science forum.
HBD

Whoever calls me ignorant shares my own opinion. Sorrowfully and tacitly I recognize my ignorance, when I consider how much I lack of what my mind in its craving for knowledge is sighing for... I console myself with the consideration that this belongs to our common nature. - Francesco Petrarca
"Nothing is easier than to persuade people who want to be persuaded and already believe." - another Petrarca gem.
Ignorance is a most formidable opponent rivaled only by arrogance; but when the two join forces, one is all but invincible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Davidjay, posted 04-05-2017 8:18 AM Davidjay has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Davidjay, posted 04-05-2017 11:00 AM herebedragons has not replied

  
herebedragons
Member (Idle past 885 days)
Posts: 1517
From: Michigan
Joined: 11-22-2009


Message 39 of 75 (803861)
04-05-2017 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Davidjay
04-05-2017 10:57 AM


Re: Reading Genesis literally but not scientifically
Just go to Proposed Topics and by your demand or request I shall come and answer your questions, if allowed to do so.
But do start off by admitting evolution again has no mathematical basis, statistical basis in its luck and chance, and then I can present my evidence with hyperlinks etc.... just request this information.
No sir. That's not how it works. First of all, I work with evolutionary biology regularly, so I am familiar with the maths involved, so why would I start a thread where I admit that evolutionary theory has no mathematical basis???
You have the proof, you have the argument. I have no question about it at this point because I am sure it is just silly nonsense. If it is not silly nonsense, then you should be able to articulate your position well enough to draft an opening post stating your position and get the topic promoted. Admin does not discriminate against a member's position, he will promote any position as long as it is reasonably well written, relatively narrowly focused and not just a cut-and-paste.
As far as me being an "honest" seeker... you know nothing about me or my background except for the tiny bit that I said here. I have arrived at my conclusions honestly.
HBD

Whoever calls me ignorant shares my own opinion. Sorrowfully and tacitly I recognize my ignorance, when I consider how much I lack of what my mind in its craving for knowledge is sighing for... I console myself with the consideration that this belongs to our common nature. - Francesco Petrarca
"Nothing is easier than to persuade people who want to be persuaded and already believe." - another Petrarca gem.
Ignorance is a most formidable opponent rivaled only by arrogance; but when the two join forces, one is all but invincible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Davidjay, posted 04-05-2017 10:57 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024