The Ten Laws of Creationism and Intelligent Design

It's reasonable to think that a talking snake outwitted God? That is not the theory of evolution. I don't know who told you that, but they were lying. ... and lying ... ... and lying.Don't you think you have some sort of moral obligation to find out about the stuff you're talking about before you start giving public lectures on the subject?

What is your swapping meant to prove? If I laugh at someone for saying "Mice are big and elephants are small", would you reply in his defense that if you were to swap the words "big" and "small" you'd produce my own view? So you would, but that doesn't mean that he and I are both equally wrong. I'm right. By changing his false statement to its opposite you would have produced not another equally false statement, but a true one.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

How have you managed to keep your ignorance so pristine for so long? No.Instead of making stuff up, why didn't you do any research? That way you wouldn't tell such blithering lies.

Funny, your profile says that your occupation is "Christian missionary", which is about as far from "scientist" as you can get.Are you by any chance an enormous liar? Well, I guess that answers the liar question then.So, supplementary follow-up question. You're religious, don't you ever worry about burning in Hell while Satan spits the word "LIAR!" into your face forever?

Now that you know this is false, please stop lying about it. If the mere fact that lying is wrong doesn't dissuade you, then consider the fact that you're not going to deceive anyone.

We know that you do not love truthfulness; this is not a subject on which you can hope to deceive us. So, not a scientist then. If you had listened to them, you would not now be so hopelessly ignorant.