CRR writes:
Does the theory of evolution require a gain of copious quantities of genetic information?
No, of course not.
CRR writes:
Both versions believe that the all life on Earth is ascended from primitive ancestors. Darwin lacked the evidence to definitely say only one ancestor but he made it clear that it was his belief that all animals and plants are descended from some one prototype. Most proponents of the modern version, on the evidence of DNA, definitely conclude there was a Last Universal Common Ancestor.
Again, simply not true. The theory of evolution says nothing about either the origin of life or any directionality.
CRR writes:
In both versions this common ancestor is envisaged as some simple life form of minimal complexity.
Again, simply not true. The Theory of Evolution says nothing about any common ancestor.
However, REALITY and the evidence does show that the earliest life forms were simple. When life is a single cell critter almost any change MUST be towards greater complexity. Once something more complex than a single cell exists the Theory of Evolution explains how it could evolve to be a single cell critter yet again.
When you begin with three definite falsehoods it most likely that any conclusion you can draw based on those misunderstandings will also be false.