|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1430 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Science is Revealed Truth | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2354 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
X, you might consider not using the word, branching, because on the Evolution is a racist doctrine thread... evolutionists repeat over and over again that evolution is not branching.
The graphs show branching, the theory talks about branching, but in that thread they adamantly deny any 'branching' as they dont want to show that evolution branches. Please go there and instruct them to just admit that evolution theorises a branching of species into new kinds of species.. The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK. .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9509 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8
|
Davidjay writes: I say our ancestors were human, and so who do you say our ancestors were ? This is as simple as I can make it. Do try to understand it so that you don't keep making silly mistakes.
quote: Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2354 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Sorry Tangle, you seem to be tangled up again...
Treeshrews were suppose to be our primate ancestor, not a cousin or a brother, but a forefather.... all four of you said it, and finally answered what evolution believes in, as our common ancestor. Do not switch back to a primate and confuse your branching.... So your silly chimps do not apply, they are primates, and that is a secondary mistake of yours or a theoretical branching of yours. So come on evolutionists quite switching horses in mid stream or mid branch.. The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK. .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9509 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8
|
Davidjay writes: Treeshrews were suppose to be our primate ancestor, not a cousin or a brother, but a forefather.... all four of you said it, and finally answered what evolution believes in, as our common ancestor. The description of the chimp and man was to show you those two branches from the same limb. So that you can picture how branching occurs and see how we are related through time. Did you understand it? The shrewlike creature you're referring to is the common ancestor of both chimps and humans. You simply have to follow the limb even further back in time. What is your problem understanding this? You seem to be trying to make the same mistake you made with bats. You must realise that you can't argue with us unless you understand the basicsJe suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. "Life, don't talk to me about life" - Marvin the Paranoid Android "Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2131 days) Posts: 6117 Joined:
|
You must realise that you can't argue with us unless you understand the basics I don't think he's interested in arguing with us. He certainly doesn't consider our replies. Rather he takes little bits from our replies and misrepresents them to suit his a priori agenda, which he preaches at every opportunity. It looks like he's just here to try and stir up the evilutionists. In other words, he's just a troll.Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge. Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein In the name of diversity, college student demands to be kept in ignorance of the culture that made diversity a value--StultisTheFool It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1 "Multiculturalism" demands that the US be tolerant of everything except its own past, culture, traditions, and identity. Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other points of view--William F. Buckley Jr.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 6.5 |
You apparently are either unable to understand how an evolutionary tree with descent works or else you are just a troll, as Coyote put it.
- xongsmith, 5.7d
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2587 From: massachusetts US Joined: Member Rating: 6.5 |
DJ asks
...who do you say our ancestors were ? Please no semantics or lengthy double speak, just a straight forward answer would suffice See Tangle's post, Message 92. I would add that if you continue down his railroad much further, you will get to the ancestor of the treeshrews.- xongsmith, 5.7d
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1430 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined:
|
So I reread the Scientific American Article, Introducing the Treeshrews: They Don't All Live in Trees and They Aren't Close to Shrews, and nowhere in the article did it say that tree shrews were ancestral to primates (and hence to people), so Davidjay's continued assertion to this effect is making the same mistake he made with bats. It's the same pattern of claim and insinuation without any apparent acceptance of corrections.
Treeshrews were suppose to be our primate ancestor, not a cousin or a brother, but a forefather.... all four of you said it, and finally answered what evolution believes in, as our common ancestor. This statement is clearly false, and was never said by the article he refers to (but doesn't quote) nor any post in any of these threads. Repeating falsehoods aggressively and rejecting correct information is not debate. What the article says about the descent of tree shrews:
quote: It is hard to see how anyone doing even a cursory reading of the article could come to the conclusion that it says treeshrews are ancestral to humans, particularly when that picture show a clear and unambiguous cladogram with primates and Scandentia evolving separately from their Euarconta common ancestor. Euarconta is neither Primate nor Scandentia, but ancestral to both. Only a loser would try to beat people over the head with demonstrably false information. Enjoyby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 309 days) Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
So this mysterious non existant clade of Euarchonta... is suppose to be our ancestor....... No. Euarchonta contains over 400 living species. It is not extinct. Nor is it "supposed to be our ancestor". Why do you talk shit all the time?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1430 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
So this mysterious non existant clade of Euarchonta... is suppose to be our ancestor....... No. Euarchonta contains over 400 living species. It is not extinct. Nor is it "supposed to be our ancestor". He's talking about the first, parent population common ancestor to all currently living descendants, and apparently still doesn't understand how clades work. Enjoyby our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 309 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
He's talking about the first, parent population common ancestor ... No. Perhaps that's what he wants to be talking about, but he isn't.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2354 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Evolutionists are linguists and not scientists.
They say we came from treeshrews and now try to say we didn;t come from treee shrews, but refuse to answer where we came from.. Poor deluded treeshrew people. Creationists say, Humans came from humans. Our ancestors were humans, we are the same yesterday and toady and forever. Evolutionists dont know where we came from, and just make it up as they go, and they dont know where we are, and dont know where they are going. Jesus does IHS DavidEvolutyionists are used to forcing their theory on students and scientists. They are not used to answering any questions on this theory, because it is their religion. And as a religion it must be accepted by faith.... It is not science and it is not logical or rational and has no facts behind it. Evolution is a con and a LIE. A big one, but because it is forced on the gullible and on students, they must accept it. This their modus operandi...and so when faced with sane biological opposition, they can only be subjective rather than objective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10067 Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
Davidjay writes: Treeshrews were suppose to be our primate ancestor, not a cousin or a brother, but a forefather.... all four of you said it, and finally answered what evolution believes in, as our common ancestor. Quote?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10067 Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
Davidjay writes: They say we came from treeshrews and now try to say we didn;t come from treee shrews, Please quote any of us where we said that we are descended from modern tree shrews.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 309 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
They say we came from treeshrews ... David, you are telling stupid lies again. Whom do you hope to deceive?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024