|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 916,386 Year: 3,643/9,624 Month: 514/974 Week: 127/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1172 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: What is the lowest multiplication rate for Humans ? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 414 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
You missed the news about Planxit...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
celestialGyoud writes:
Problems that a theory can not solve YET are not a reason to call a theory obsolete.
. bring up your list of problems that evolutionary theory has failed to solve . .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1172 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
There are four different reasons why your theory becomes obsolete,
and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people. Actually the reason why Evolutionary theory in regards to Human origins is not declared obsolete is because money speaks louder than Math. Edited by celestialGyoud, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4409 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.4 |
Actually the reason why Evolutionary theory in regards to Human origins is not declared obsolete is because money speaks louder than Math. Yep, every time they tried to declare it obsolete I ponied up $25 to keep it afloat. What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 304 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people. What growth rate are you falsely assuming for the human population over that period, and why are you ignoring the fact that it's known to be wrong?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10033 Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
celestialGyoud writes: There are four different reasons why your theory becomes obsolete,and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people. The theory of evolution is not obsolete because it figured out a long time ago that birth rates and infant mortality for humans were quite different in the past.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RAZD Member (Idle past 1425 days) Posts: 20714 From: the other end of the sidewalk Joined: |
and one of those reasons is that if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people. As I've told you before CrazyDiamond7 (see Message 35), math cannot change reality, so if your math calculations result in something that doesn't match reality it is your math that is at fault. Usually a missed assumption. Curiously it was the fact that animal populations did not increase to massive numbers (Malthusian formulas apply to all living species) is what gave both Darwin and Wallace the inspiration for natural selection eliminating those less adapted to their ecologies. And, humans seem particularly well adapted to culling their own populations with on going wars ... So you argument is invalid, because it ain't real. It was invalid 4 years ago, and time has not changed that. Enjoy Edited by RAZD, : .by our ability to understand Rebel☮American☆Zen☯Deist ... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ... to share. Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 432 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
celestialGyoud writes:
You don't need global exterminations to limit population growth. All you need is a death rate near the birth rate. Unless you know what the birth and death rates were on a day-to-day basis in the past, your calculation is just garbage in, garbage out.
... if there were Humans multiplying on this Earth 34,000 years ago then it would have taken several global exterminations of Humans occuring every five thousand years interval, because that is the only way the Human population would have reached 10 to 15 million people (10 thousand years ago) rather than 5,5 billion people.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1172 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
.
. What is the lowest possible rate that the Humans could keep on growing and multiplying? With regards specifically to the origin of the Human body, the evolutionary theory is mathematically proven wrong. Because it is not possible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken more than 25 thousand years to reach 1 million. Also, it is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe. .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17825 Joined: Member Rating: 2.2 |
quote: -100%. Yes, I do mean a negative growth rate. Extinction is a possibility, and that IS extinction.
quote: I look forward to seeing your proof. I hope that you will provide documented figures on carrying capacity of the land given the lifestyles of the people.
quote: Since biology does not deal much with language formation or cultural divisions I would not expect it to. You would have to go beyond biology for that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AnswersInGenitals Member (Idle past 171 days) Posts: 673 Joined:
|
With regards specifically to the origin of the Human body, the evolutionary theory is mathematically proven wrong. Because it is not possible that 2,000 people in Europe would have taken more than 25 thousand years to reach 1 million. In Northern British Columbia there is a pine forest.In the middle of that pine forest there is a pine tree. That pine tree has 100 branches. Each of those branches has 100 pine cones. Each of those pine cones has 100 seeds. Every few years the scales of those cones open and release their 1,000,000 seeds into the wind. The population of pine trees is stable. It does not grow by a factor of 1,000,000 every few years. Also, it is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe. It is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain why planets move in elliptical orbits (but they do).It is impossible that evolutionary theory can explain how an electrical charge difference can cause lightning (but it does). It is impossible that evolutionary theory can prove that goldelightArchangel was home schooled (but he obviously was).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1172 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
.
The fact is that evolutionary theory named human origins is entitled to explain the origin or appearance of 42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe. .
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8527 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.2 |
No it isn't you idiot.
Factio Republicana delenda est.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
frako Member (Idle past 326 days) Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: |
42 different languages and ethnic groups in Europe. You do know that all languages are related. Afrikaans: Moeder or MaAlbanian: Nene or Meme Arabic: Ahm Belarusan: Matka Bosnian: Majka Brazilian: Mae Bulgarian: Majka Catalan: Mare Croatian: Mati or Majka Czech: Maminka Danish: Mor Dutch: Moeder or Moer Estonian: Ema Filipino: Ina Finnish: Aiti French: Mere or Maman German: Mutter Greek: Mana or Mitera Haitian Creole: Manman Hawaiian: Makuahine Hindi: Ma or Maji Hungarian: Anya or Fu Icelandic: Mamma Indonesian: Induk, Ibu, Biang or Nyokap Irish: Mathair Italian: Madre or Mamma Japanese: Okaasan or Haha Latin: Mater Latvian: Mamma Lithuanian: Motina Malay: Ibu Norwegian: Mamma or Mor Persian: Madr or Maman Polish: Matka or Mama Portuguese: Mae Punjabi: Mai, Mataji or Pabbo Romanian: Mama or Maica Russian: Mama Samoan: Tina Serbian: Majka Slovak: Mama or Matka Spanish: Madre, Mama or Mami Swahili: Mama, Mzazi or Mzaa Swedish: Mamma, Mor or Morsa Turkish: Anne, Ana or Valide Ukrainian: Mati Urdu: Ammee Vietnamese: Me Welsh: Mam Yiddish: Muter Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand What are the Christians gonna do to me ..... Forgive me, good luck with that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
frako Member (Idle past 326 days) Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: |
What is the lowest possible rate that the Humans could keep on growing and multiplying? why do they need to keep on growing. Couldn't the number stay relatively the same because do to their lack of technology and knowledge they couldn't grow enough food for more. Or the lack of sanitation would just kill them off via illness if a settlement got to big? Edited by frako, : No reason given.Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand What are the Christians gonna do to me ..... Forgive me, good luck with that.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024