Summations Only

Hi Taq, What do you base that belief on?God Bless,

Hi Coyote, If you are referring to the flood Faith and all other YEC argue I will agree with you.If you are talking about the Biblical flood I will disagree.There would be no way to disprove the Biblical flood if the Bible is true.There was one body of land at Genesis 1:10 as all the water was gathered to one place in Genesis 1:9.This body of land would have still been in existence at the time of the flood in Genes chapter 6, 7.The earth was then divided into what we see today during the days of Peleg.All the mountains were formed during this division.Which would make it impossible for you to find a trace of a world wide flood.But there is no doubt that every inch of dry land we have today was covered with water in the past. Which agrees with Genesis 1:2.Lets see now I have 3 scientific facts that support words that were written over 3400 years ago.One land mass.
land mass covered with water
divided land massGod Bless,

Hi Taq, It is actually based on your assumption of what the Bible flood would have been. What the land mass was like, and the location of the land mass.Now if you have specific evidence please share it.God Bless,

Hi Cat Are you saying science is wrong and Pangaea never existed?God Bless,Edited by ICANT, : No reason given.

Hi Faith, Was there strata in the earth prior to the flood?What happened to it?God Bless,