|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2351 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Palm to forehead moment ......
. . . They'll probably say I misrepresented my palm and missed my forehead...... even when I wrote the above..Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 95 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Ringo writes:
Of course not - creation is a miracle; miracles can't be explained.
Creationism ... it doesn't explain HOW
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 306 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
Fossilization is quite rare, as evolutionists often tell us when explaining the lack of transitional forms. Evolutionists never "explain the lack of transitional forms". Don't tell silly lies. Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5949 Joined: Member Rating: 5.5
|
Of course not - creation is a miracle; miracles can't be explained. Then it cannot be scientific. For the same reason why no supernaturalistic explanation can be scientific. For the same reason why "goddidit" is worse than absolutely useless as a scientific explanation. For the same reason you just gave. So glad to see that you are finally beginning to understand. Now we can place that silly "creation is scientific" claim in the grave and move on to more productive discussion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2351 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Sure creationism can be explained...... because it is by DESIGN, and the design itself proves its creative force and consistency in all things.
Its called the ARCHITECTURE of the UNIVERSE. The Lord, the builder, has common templates that can easily be discerned with a little study Architecture of the Universe The Lord was and is the Great Architect who createdall things . . . . including every living thing. This He did through His consistent templates of common design. He built all things, with us as His supreme creation and 'temple'. For we are made in His Image, and His Handiwork is shown in all the Earth as well as the whole Universe. What is Architectural Beauty - PhiPhi construction of Body Graphics Golden Section in Human Body Golden Section 'Phi' Class Divine Design of Human Face Face Profile Design Phi Mysteries Spiral Pathway Cydonian Altar Creation not Evolution Creation in 24 hours World History Design Phi Template of Life Lord's Phi Spiral of Creation DNA Phi Spiral SemenGreat Pyramid Prophecy Who built the Great Pyramid Harmonic Power of Great Pyramid Harmony and Chord of Triumph Lord's Temple, Architecture and Sacred Sex New Jerusalem is a Crystal Pyramid Lord's Temple is Human and Sexual Nakedness on Ramp to Altar Christos Angle Ramp Fire on Altar of Sacrifice Fire of the Lord Joachin and Boaz Pillars Male and Female Pillars Chartres and 2 Prophetic Pillars Tree of Life - Kaballah Sex in the Temple Ark and Tabernacle ARTICLES Sacred Geometry Sacred Geometery and Music Squared Circle Naked Man in Squared Circle Vitruvian Man Graphics Solved Female comparison to Tabernacle Vescica Pisces Pearly Gates of Virgin Temple Gates are Female Genitalia Tabernacle - Vescica Pisces Sex in the Tabernacle Christian Fish Symbol Music of the Spheres Heavenly Body Harmonics Pythagoras Comma Tabernacle of the Sun Magic Square of the Sun Tabernacle of Light Light Speed proves Design Phi Spiral of Planets ARCHITECTURE Davidjayjordan@yahoo.com Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10044 Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
Dredge writes: Is that what I was trying to do? I was trying to demonstrate that the theory that all life shares a common ancestor is irrelevant in the fight against HIV/AIDS and in the development of the swine vaccine. And? The theory that nuclear fusion produces heat in the middle of the Sun is also irrelevant in fighting AIDS/HIV. Does that mean that fusion does not occur in the center of the Sun?
Taq, now is an excellent chance to help deliver Dredge from the darkness of his pathetic ignorance. Please explain how the theory that all life on earth shares a common ancestor has proven useful in the treatment of HIV/AIDS and in developing swine flu vaccine. This should be a piece'a'cake for someone of your intelligence and learning. I already showed you in multiple posts how evolution and common ancestry is applied in biology. Why don't you address those posts?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10044 Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
Dredge writes: Of course not - creation is a miracle; miracles can't be explained. "Because they know not the forces of nature, and in order that they may have comrades in their ignorance, they suffer not that others should search out anything, and would have us believe like rustics and ask no reason...But we ask in all things a reason must be sought."--William of Conches,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
"Ultimate power" and "ultimate wisdom" don't explain anything.
But it involves ultimate power and ultimate wisdom as well. Davidjay writes:
You still have forty pages of unanswered posts.
There I answered another one of your questions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Dredge writes:
Exactly. So why do you even bring up pseudo-scientific arguments against evolution?
Of course not - creation is a miracle; miracles can't be explained.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 95 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
The miracle of creation cannot be explained with science, but this doesn't mean it didn't happen or that there is no evidence of creation.
A child doesn't understand how man managed to walk on the moon - does this mean it didn't happen? Edited by Dredge, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5949 Joined: Member Rating: 5.5 |
The miracle of creation cannot be explained with science, but this doesn't mean it didn't happen ... So whoever says that? Other than creationists and those who take creationists at their word? If you think that science or evolution disproves creation, then you are an absolute idiot. Or merely an extremely delusional fool. Evolution does not disprove creation. It does disprove your idiotically false ideas about creation and about evolution. But evolution does not disprove creation.
... or that there is no evidence of creation. So just what is that evidence? I've been hearing that empty claim ever since 1981. Never once did any creationist ever offer that evidence. Never once! For example, in 1985 a creationist from work, Charles, and I attended a creationist debate that featured both leading creationists, Dr. Henry Morris and Dr. Duane Gish. As we were leaving, Charles was in shock. He kept mumbling, "We have mountains of evidence that will blow the evolutionists away. Why didn't they present it? We have mountains of evidence. Why didn't they present it?" When I saw him again half a decade later, he absolutely hated creationists and wanted nothing to do with them. What ... fucking ... evidence?
A child doesn't understand how man managed to walk on the moon - does this mean it didn't happen? Well, if that child thinks that man had to have built a ladder long enough to reach to the moon, then, yes, that did not happen. But if we remove the shackles of childish misunderstanding, then we can indeed see that, yes, it did happen. And how it happened. But if you keep yourself shackled by childish misunderstanding, then nothing we try to tell you will make any sense. Your choice.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Davidjay  Suspended Member (Idle past 2351 days) Posts: 1026 From: B.C Canada Joined: |
Pst.... man didnt walk on the moon....... it was a con.... for political purposes
Double Pst...... newest news release is that they accidentally lost the technology to get to the moon, to cover up their original lie, of going there.... lost technology to go to the moon - Google Search Now back to evolutionists preaching to other evolutionists You have to have common sense and intelligence from the Lord to see through the cons of this world, see through politics and see through evolution.Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science. Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5949 Joined: Member Rating: 5.5
|
Please refrain from posting non sequiturs to things that you cannot understand. You only succeed in wasting bandwidth and and revealing your god to be false and your religion injurious to one's mental health.
I was making a specific point to Dredge. Once you have actually understood it, then you could reply to it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 95 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Taq writes:
In post #392 RAZD claimed that the theory that humans and apes have a common ancestor "was useful in finding vaccines for HIV". I asked him to explain how - no answer was forthcoming. So maybe you can explain it to me. And? ----------------------- As for your previous posts that you keep mentioning, I've already told you that I'm not qualified to comment on them.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 95 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
RAZD writes:
Really. Ok, there are similarities. So what? These similarities exist whether one is an evolutionist, a creationist, a Hindu, a Scientologist or a Freemason. In other words, the existence of the genetic similarities between humans and pigs is independent of the theory that humans and chimps have a common ancestor ... and the theory that all life on earth shares a common ancestor. Just as understanding the genetic similarities with pigs was useful in finding vaccines for ... Swine influenza Therefore, I suspect that you are mistaken - the theory of common descent was a complete irrelevance in developing swine flu vaccine.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024