Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Debunking the Evolutionary God of 'Selection'
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2319 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 226 of 323 (809689)
05-20-2017 10:52 AM
Reply to: Message 225 by RAZD
05-17-2017 8:36 PM


Re: As mentioned evolutionists never answer questions
Color does not prove mutational advancement or branching nor is it a PROOF for evolution.
You cant have it both ways, evolutionists..
You say babies are different, and that consequently we are evolving and branching out from the original babies of our ancestors
Yes they are different, different in every generation, because you have mutations your parents did not have. This is measured and documented and it would be dumb and stupid to say otherwise.
You illogically deny that this shows your racist doctrine, even though you want to say and state and claim that new babies are different. Thats ridicuolous...... either state babies are the same like creationists say, or state they are differtent and accept the racist doctrine foundation.
We humans are the same as always since the BEGINNING, our children do not have different brains and systems and skin and hair than us,
Your doctrine to put it mildly is a lie....
Humans are not evolving, recombination of genetic material is our created variation by our CREATOR, to give variety..
Inbreeding is not evolution, colour change is not evolution..... take a course in genetics and retract your inconsistent claims.
Evolutionists ploy are as bad as the leader who said, you just have to tell a big enough lie, and then people will accept it because it is BIG and outrageous.
Evolution is a BIG LIE
EvolutionisaBIGLIE
Eight pages

Being told to "Fuck you I can fucking write whatever I want" by CatsEye to me I thought would be against the rules Here( at EvC Forum: Isaiah 53 speaks about ISRAEL, and not about the messiah. ...message 145 ) but this board says there are no rules concerning languageHERE, so allow me to repost Cats eyes comments as logically therefore his words can not offend anyone....and can be part of my signature..... because it is not against the rules

This message is a reply to:
 Message 225 by RAZD, posted 05-17-2017 8:36 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2017 12:04 PM Davidjay has replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2319 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 228 of 323 (809720)
05-20-2017 12:17 PM
Reply to: Message 227 by RAZD
05-20-2017 12:04 PM


Re:
Thanks Raz, for answering where humans came from.... much appreciated.... because evolutionists flatly refuse to answer the multitude of embarassing questions that can be asked of them..
Raz says through his posted graph that humans came from
( EvC Forum: Information... Message 328 )
Humans came from Homininae, which came from Hominidae which evolved from Hominoidae which evolved from Hominoidea....
I win, evolutionist is such a lie and so bogus, to be almsot laughable if it wasnt taken so seriously by the evolutionists.
Its just semantics brethren and non brethren, just word manipulation and spelling...
Read it again and marvel, that evolutionists actually believe our ancestors followed this spelling lineage......
Humans ancestor was Homininae, which came from Hominidae which evolved from Hominoidae which evolved from Hominoidea....
More concisely put in a flow chart for clarity
Human-Homininae-Hominidae-Hominoidae-Hominoidea....
There it is BREAKING NEWS, we humans evolved from Hominoidea's 20 million years ago..... our ancestors are hominoidea's..
I say our ancestors were humans, the same as us.
Evolutionists say different, you choose your ancestor, and see if spelling is the defining factor or whether truth and science and common sense prevails.
**************************
You see Raz, your theory is mere semantics and word twisting classifications, but you have no transition forms or species or evidence.... let alone a MISSING LINK...
You just shuffle your letters around to form new words, and bedazzle the guillible.

Evolutionists are brainless whoosies, gutless and cowards.
They are not scientists, but religionists that choose to deny facts and truths of science. Intelligence and design always defeats their lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is a losers doctrine, simply because they are either lazy or dishonest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2017 12:04 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 229 by RAZD, posted 05-20-2017 6:39 PM Davidjay has not replied
 Message 230 by Taq, posted 05-22-2017 12:13 PM Davidjay has replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2319 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 231 of 323 (810313)
05-27-2017 6:57 PM
Reply to: Message 230 by Taq
05-22-2017 12:13 PM


Re: Re:
Yes, its just semantics...... again you dont know math or SET LAW.
I didnt ask for the present grouping and nomenclature of species and kinds and breeds etc... I asked for our ancestry... aflow chart.
Changing the group via a more inclusive name by changing a letter here or there is hardly true science... just a way of grouping what exists....
Evolution says one species or kind evolved into a new species or kind..
What was our ancestor, and who was their ancestor or father.
This isn't higher math, its just a simple straight forward question, that deserves a straight forward answer..
Humans came from _________.
_______ came from _________.
________ evolved from _______.

Evolutionists are brainless whoosies, gutless and cowards.
They are not scientists, but religionists that choose to deny facts and truths of science. Intelligence and design always defeats their lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is a losers doctrine, simply because they are either lazy or dishonest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by Taq, posted 05-22-2017 12:13 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by bluegenes, posted 05-29-2017 12:01 PM Davidjay has replied
 Message 235 by Taq, posted 05-30-2017 10:41 AM Davidjay has replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2319 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 233 of 323 (810466)
05-29-2017 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 232 by bluegenes
05-29-2017 12:01 PM


Re: Clearly, it's impossible to debunk selection
I agree, you dont know who our ancestors are or were.
Thanks for further proof, that you can not answer that question.
If you evolutionists knew, you would have stated such, but you do not know.
I *** evolutionists ****

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.
Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 232 by bluegenes, posted 05-29-2017 12:01 PM bluegenes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by bluegenes, posted 05-30-2017 2:47 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2319 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 236 of 323 (810493)
05-30-2017 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 235 by Taq
05-30-2017 10:41 AM


Re:
Agreeed, evolutionists dont know where us humans came from....
Because none of them can answer the question...
Its the major focus of their research and bone digging and imagainations that they send off to their artists for their grapghic depictions, and yet none of them know from where we came.
But allow me to answer from a creationists scientific perspective.
We came from humans, the original couple was human just as we are human.
Our size may be taller and we now have more skin colours, but we're still just humans. Humans beget humans. Mystery solved, no evolution, no branching, no beneficial magical new mutations with new limbs and new organs, just the SAME.
Remember size and color are not proof of evolution, as evolutionists so try to claim and assert and pretend.
No selection god has selected a new species of human, that are not of our KIND.... artic winters and amazon rain forest envirorment has not evolved new people, new humans.
The god of selection is dead and is an untruth, also called a ***

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.
Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 235 by Taq, posted 05-30-2017 10:41 AM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by Taq, posted 05-30-2017 11:26 AM Davidjay has not replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2319 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 247 of 323 (810736)
06-01-2017 9:30 AM
Reply to: Message 246 by Tangle
06-01-2017 5:10 AM


Peppered moths are color change and not evolutionary change
Peppered moth Lie, is just a color change and as we know or any geneticist knows or any elementary biologist knows, a color change does not mean there has been evolution changing one species into another.
Evolutionists are so desperate for proofs and all they have is color change, and inbreeding after all these years. They are pathetic to say the least.... and desperate as ever.

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.
Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by Tangle, posted 06-01-2017 5:10 AM Tangle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 248 by Diomedes, posted 06-01-2017 10:39 AM Davidjay has replied
 Message 250 by RAZD, posted 06-01-2017 4:35 PM Davidjay has not replied
 Message 252 by CRR, posted 06-01-2017 5:46 PM Davidjay has not replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2319 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 249 of 323 (810742)
06-01-2017 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 248 by Diomedes
06-01-2017 10:39 AM


Re: Peppered moths are color change and not evolutionary change
Change of color is mere color change just as with the human population where color change or race difference does not produce a different species. Humans whether black or white or peppered is not a proof of evolution.
Come on evolutionists you are embarassing yourselves again..... and agin.
You have only two supposed proofs of evolutionary change, color change and inbreeding.
Both have been shown to be lies and non proofs of desperate evolutionists.
(Remember if you state that humans are different when their color changes, then you in your inconsistencies and falsities prove again that evolution would therefore be a racist doctrine.
No blacks and whites are equal and equally human. Color change is superficial and is not some kind of evolutionary beneficial mutation that makes one human different from other humans.

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.
Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by Diomedes, posted 06-01-2017 10:39 AM Diomedes has not replied

  
Davidjay 
Suspended Member (Idle past 2319 days)
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004


Message 255 of 323 (810920)
06-03-2017 6:10 AM
Reply to: Message 254 by Tangle
06-02-2017 3:19 AM


Re: Fire flies, cameleons
The old peppered moth observation way back in the fifties or sixties, is an adaption ability of the Lord for these moths.
Its not proof of evolution, not a cornerstone, not some awesome revelation for evolutionists to worship.
Get real, its a selected color change.... by a brilliant God for these moths.
No different than camoflage skins or hair etc on different animals.... spots on snakes etc etc etc.... underbelly colours on fish to hide them from predators below, etc etc etc etc...
For if we want to really discuss animal abilities and gifts of God, consider chameleons, and how they can change their colours...
Did they get magic mutations to give them this ability ? Obviously not. Did a bunch of chemicals get together and select their compositions to mentally connect up with their nervous systems to change their colours.
Did fire flies, get their cold heat and light by accident and just retain them afterwards because fewer predators could see them NO, Did the Lord give them this absolutely amazing ability and light to be seen by us and other fire flies... YES.
Mystery solved, so forget these pepered moths as if they are a great revelation of truth by evolution to the world, in evolution showing its magnificience
Edited by Davidjay, : No reason given.

Evolution is not science. It did not create life nor did it diversify life. It didn;t create the laws that exist nor did it create science. It is a religion and not Science.
Intelligent design always defeats evolutions lack of design and lack of intelligence. Luck and Chance is not a scientific doctrine,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 254 by Tangle, posted 06-02-2017 3:19 AM Tangle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 256 by CRR, posted 06-05-2017 3:25 AM Davidjay has not replied
 Message 269 by Taq, posted 06-07-2017 12:31 PM Davidjay has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024