That's not what I was referring to as an "irrational fear". For a hint see the subtitle of this post, your post, and the one you replied to.
For me, an irrational fear is one that is not based known mechanisms. I guess we just differ on what is and isn't irrational.
Indeed. It's just unfortunate no one here is advocating such real alternatives to fossil fuels.
Indeed, it is. At times, it is hard to separate the movement to replace fossil fuels from the Green movement which fights to stop nuclear power. It seems to be a case of cutting off the nose to spite the face.
Well. France's production is below the U.S.
That's the thing with looking at small countries - it's easy to distort the reality of the situation with large percentages of rather small wholes.
It is a step though.
France's production as a percentage of total power output is well above the US. About 75% of France's electrical power comes from nuclear.
"In 2004, fission energy made up the largest share of France's energy consumption at 39%. Looking purely at electricity, though, 407 TWh (75%) out of the country's total production of 541 TWh of electricity was from fission-electric power stations, the highest percentage in the world."
Nuclear power in France - Wikipedia
I see no reason why this wouldn't scale with population.