How do you define the word Evolution?

If the changes needed for macroevolution could not happen, then how is it possible for huamans and chimps to survive with 40 million differences between their genomes? If mutations can't change genomes enough to produce macroevolution, then neither can a designer.

Using your definition, there are no species on Earth since all populations gain genetic diversity with new mutations in each generation.

Your premise is disproven by the emergence of the new allele by random mutations prior to it replacing the old allele. This process repeats over and over, producing macroevolution. Mutations produce those phenotypes, not natural selection. Natural selection can only make those phenotypes more or less common within the population. Mutations increase genetic diversity. Your argument is disproven.

Then there are no kinds according to your definition since mutations increase genetic diversity in every generation. Take the cheetah as an example. A population bottleneck reduced their genetic diversity, but that diversity is increasing with every generation due to accumulation of new mutations.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

You are leaving out the process of mutation which is why your argument doesn't work.

Once that new phenotype is fixed in the population then mutations will occur in that fixed allele producing more genetic diversity.

Where?

Selection can only select for phenotypes that already exist. Mutations are responsible for the creation of those phenotypes. Last I checked, humans don't have the DNA needed to give birth to chimps. No genome has the ability to produce all known species by the processes you are describing. No mixture of human alleles will produce an elephant. In order to have both elephants and humans you need different DNA sequences, and that's what mutations produce. I already disproved that claim. In the pocket mouse there was a gain of a phenotype from mutation, not from a loss in genetic material."Rock pocket mice are generally light-colored and live on light-colored rocks. However, populations of dark (melanic) mice are found on dark lava, and this concealing coloration provides protection from avian and mammalian predators. We conducted association studies by using markers in candidate pigmentation genes and discovered four mutations in the melanocortin-1-receptor gene, Mc1r, that seem to be responsible for adaptive melanism in one population of lava-dwelling pocket mice."
Just a moment...This new phenotype was not produced by loss of alleles. This new phenotype arose through mutation within existing alleles.

Mutations occur in populations bred by humans, and they produce new phenotypes.

Nope. All it takes is a mutation. The allele for light brown coat color is still the most common allele in the total pocket mouse population. The black allele didn't have to replace the light brown allele in order for there to be black mice. I am talking about random mutations which are the hallmark of Darwinian evolution.

That was already disproven as well when we showed you thousands of alleles for a single gene in a single species. Those alleles are the product of mutation. Mutations produce new alleles.

If you don't have any evidence to back this claim, then you don't have proven premises like you claimed.Unless you can show that mutations don't happen, you have no choice but to conclude that losses of alleles due to selection is reversed with the emergence of new alleles through mutation.

The black and brown mice freely interbreed. They are part of the same population. Both alleles exist in the population. One has not replaced the other. There are still black mice. Therefore, the black allele does not have to replace the brown allele in order for there to be black mice. What do you mean by "it shows up right on time"? That makes no sense. The pocket mice were not facing extinction. There is a massive amount of brown desert that they were doing just fine in.

There have been brown and black mice from the very start. Don't know where you got the white mice from.The black mice are only found in limited areas that have black basalt rock outcroppings. In the vast majority of territory where pocket mice are found they are brown. The brown allele has not replaced the black allele, and the black allele has not replaced the brown allele. The black allele did not have to replace the brown allele in order for there to be black mice.

But you said that the black allele had to completely replace the brown allele in order for that phenotype to exist. That isn't the case.