|
Author
|
Topic: The TRVE history of the Flood...
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
|
Message 1073 of 1352 (812436)
06-16-2017 1:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1065 by Faith
06-16-2017 11:55 AM
|
|
Re: The date of the flood...
They are obvious differences in the geological column. Any valid theory must account for them. No matter what you call them. If they have nothing to do with your views then you have no hypothesis about what caused them and the rest of the geologic column. Edited by JonF, : No reason given. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1065 by Faith, posted 06-16-2017 11:55 AM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 1074 by Faith, posted 06-16-2017 1:23 PM | | JonF has replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
|
|
Message 1075 of 1352 (812448)
06-16-2017 2:39 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1074 by Faith
06-16-2017 1:23 PM
|
|
Re: The date of the flood...
Have you looked at the topic of this thread? Boy, that sure is some magic water-like substance! That amount and isotopic distribution of iridium didn't come from Earth.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1074 by Faith, posted 06-16-2017 1:23 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
|
|
Message 1083 of 1352 (812524)
06-17-2017 8:15 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1081 by Faith
06-17-2017 7:51 AM
|
|
Re: Ducking, dodging and weaving (same as always)
I've proved it from evidence many many times. No, you've denied it many times.
There's something wrong with the dating methods, sorry And yet the distribution of radioactive parent and daughter isotopes follows an obvious pattern which demands explanation. For which you have none. Just like the thousands of other observed facts for which you have no explanation other than magic.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1081 by Faith, posted 06-17-2017 7:51 AM | | Faith has not replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 1158 of 1352 (812804)
06-20-2017 10:05 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1157 by Faith
06-20-2017 9:43 AM
|
|
Re: Evidence for the Flood revisited
IOW you got nuthin' but your fantasy.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1157 by Faith, posted 06-20-2017 9:43 AM | | Faith has not replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
|
|
Message 1176 of 1352 (813159)
06-23-2017 7:52 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1171 by ICANT
06-23-2017 5:38 PM
|
|
Re: Flood waters receeded into depths
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1171 by ICANT, posted 06-23-2017 5:38 PM | | ICANT has seen this message but not replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 1185 of 1352 (813227)
06-24-2017 1:18 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1169 by ICANT
06-23-2017 4:40 PM
|
|
Re: Ducking, dodging and weaving (same as always)
The water being under great pressure would come forth through what ever hole was made in the rock which hole was later pluged when God closed them. Same mistake several creationists have made, including Walt Brown who should know better. The water would have come out as superheated steam. Parboiled Noah, anyone?
Walter Brown's Hydroplate Model
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1169 by ICANT, posted 06-23-2017 4:40 PM | | ICANT has not replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 1190 of 1352 (813323)
06-26-2017 8:56 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1187 by CRR
06-26-2017 5:51 AM
|
|
Re: how much water?
If the world's water was converted to a uniform layer over the Earth's surface it would be 2.7km thick No. If it was converted to a uniform layer over a perfect sphere the size of the Earth it would be 2.7 km thick, and there would be no land-based life. SFW?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1187 by CRR, posted 06-26-2017 5:51 AM | | CRR has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 1196 by ICANT, posted 06-27-2017 4:30 AM | | JonF has replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
|
|
Message 1201 of 1352 (813403)
06-27-2017 8:18 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1196 by ICANT
06-27-2017 4:30 AM
|
|
Re: how much water?
No. If it was converted to a uniform layer over a perfect sphere the size of the Earth it would be 2.7 km thick, and there would be no land-based life.
That would equal 8,856 feet. And it would equal 13.4216 furlongs. SFW?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1196 by ICANT, posted 06-27-2017 4:30 AM | | ICANT has seen this message but not replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
|
|
Message 1202 of 1352 (813404)
06-27-2017 8:19 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1197 by ICANT
06-27-2017 4:36 AM
|
|
Re: how much water?
After the flood in the days of Peleg God divided the earth and that is when all the mountain ranges were created Not according to the Bible. "Mountains of Ararat", remember?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1197 by ICANT, posted 06-27-2017 4:36 AM | | ICANT has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 1211 by ICANT, posted 06-27-2017 12:12 PM | | JonF has replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
|
|
Message 1215 of 1352 (813431)
06-27-2017 12:43 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1211 by ICANT
06-27-2017 12:12 PM
|
|
Re: how much water?
The bible says "mountains of Ararat". Do you deny the Bible?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1211 by ICANT, posted 06-27-2017 12:12 PM | | ICANT has not replied |
|
JonF
Member (Idle past 196 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: 06-23-2003
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 1277 of 1352 (814374)
07-08-2017 9:12 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1271 by CRR
07-08-2017 4:34 AM
|
|
Re: Ice Cores.
Already posted by others. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1271 by CRR, posted 07-08-2017 4:34 AM | | CRR has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2