Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 109 (8803 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 11-23-2017 9:33 AM
412 online now:
halibut, NoNukes, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Phat (AdminPhat), Tangle (6 members, 406 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: jaufre
Post Volume:
Total: 822,879 Year: 27,485/21,208 Month: 1,398/1,714 Week: 241/365 Day: 10/73 Hour: 0/1

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev12
3
Author Topic:   Home sapiens older than we realized
ringo
Member
Posts: 13881
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005
Member Rating: 1.8


Message 31 of 35 (818427)
08-28-2017 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Porkncheese
08-28-2017 12:36 AM


Re: 1 simple point made
Porkncheese writes:

CREATIONIST KILL HIM im expecting


If correcting your errors kills you, you're in for a rough ride when you finish school.

Porkncheese writes:

As for this post the only point I was trying to make which everyone conveiniently avoided is that mankind was living without written language, buildings or farming for 194,000 years.


You were corrected on what you said, not what you meant. Around here, everybody gets corrected. If you stay you'll find that some of the most vigorous discussions are between people on the same "side".
This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Porkncheese, posted 08-28-2017 12:36 AM Porkncheese has not yet responded

  
Porkncheese
Member
Posts: 72
Joined: 08-25-2017


Message 32 of 35 (818468)
08-29-2017 5:44 AM


Error
This final line on my post about creationist.
I don't remember writting that.
So I don't know if I was screwing around with other words or whatever but its not my view.
Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by RAZD, posted 08-29-2017 7:06 AM Porkncheese has not yet responded

    
RAZD
Member
Posts: 19228
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 33 of 35 (818472)
08-29-2017 7:06 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Porkncheese
08-29-2017 5:44 AM


reply button link
This final line on my post about creationist.
I don't remember writting that.

s'okay

btw -- If you use the message reply buttons (there's one at the bottom right of each message):


... your message is linked to the one you are replying to (adds clarity). You can also look at the way a post is formatted with the "peek" button next to it.

Enjoy


we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAmerican☆Zen☯Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.


Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Porkncheese, posted 08-29-2017 5:44 AM Porkncheese has not yet responded

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 3951
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 34 of 35 (818473)
08-29-2017 7:18 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Porkncheese
08-28-2017 12:36 AM


Re: 1 simple point made
But all that shows is that written language is relatively modern.

Are you saying that it is odd that for so long there were anatomically humans around so so long without language?

I'm not seeing the problem with language being a recent thing.

Welcome to the forum, by the way. We need more creationists here.

All the best

Edited by Larni, : Do people still buy DVDs?


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Porkncheese, posted 08-28-2017 12:36 AM Porkncheese has not yet responded

    
caffeine
Member
Posts: 1349
From: Prague, Czech Republic
Joined: 10-22-2008
Member Rating: 2.4


Message 35 of 35 (818483)
08-29-2017 12:52 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Pressie
08-28-2017 7:37 AM


Re: 1 simple point made
Oh, and you're wrong anyway. In China there was written language around 12 000 years ago.

According to who? The standard timeline puts the earliest known writing in China less than 4,000 years ago. The most extreme claims seem to be at about 8,000 years; but there's considerable dispute over whether the earliest claimed examples are pictographic writing, or just pictures.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Pressie, posted 08-28-2017 7:37 AM Pressie has not yet responded

  
Prev12
3
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017