Evidence of the flood

Right, your subjective 2s are more legit than my subjective 2s. There's a word for that kind of thinking....

Yes, that is what I am saying. Your belief, the cult of jar is subjective.

No Percy. I do not try to prove creation with science. I've already expressed my subjective belief multiple times, but I will write it one more time just for you. God does not want us to find physical evidence of His existence because John 3:16 The REAL world is part subjective. We cannot live by objective means only for multiple reasons.1. It is impossible
2. Some objectiveness changes over time and knowledge I am not looking for evidence. It found me. The story of the flood is amazing, be it fake or real.

Fine, I am a creationist who does not believe in creation science, fair enough?I don't like labels. Liek I prefer not to be called a Christian. Disciple is better, because I am always learning.

Wait a sec, did you just call me a scientist? Are you accusing me of using the scientific method?There you go, putting words in my mouth. I never offered a hypotheses. I just offered evidence. As I stated earlier, it was because I am tired of hearing the phrase "there is no evidence". There is evidence, you just choose to ignore it based on other evidence.So my position is that you are lying saying that there is no evidence. The end. If you don't have the Holy Spirit, or a Godly understanding of the bible, of course you wouldn't understand. I;ve said it 3 different ways, lets make it 4.You must believe in God by faith.In order for that statement to be true, you cannot use objective evidence to believe in God. That's my hypothesis, based on John 3:16 and many other verses. What does that have to do with the fact that the evidence found me? I wasn't looking for evidence, it just happened, and as I watched it I felt the Holy Spirit telling me this is the way God designed animals.

You can post all you want. I support freedom of speech. I may not agree with you, so I am staying out your sidebar discussions, but you are free to post.

I don't have a position, again. Yes it is. It doesn't prove or explain anything. It is just evidence. Right, that's why the hawk does not prove God exists. As soon as you start presenting facts(if you could stop character assaulting), I won't have to listen to voices in my head. The other people that responded objectively get it, why don't you?

My belief in Christ came way after my agnostic stage. It isn't holding me back. Like I said, it doesn't matter if the flood happened or not. That is not really what this is about. What this is about is being able to be open minded enough so you won't be held back from finding Christ.

No it isn't. No it doesn't. Because animals seek shelter in other situations does negate that they seek shelter in a flood, or biblical flood. It is only in addition too. It really does not get any simpler. If you choose to ignore it, then its on you. Yep, before He died and gave us the Holt Spirit. God gave us tons of physical evidence. You see where that got us? After Jesus died it takes faith. John 3:16.

Yes we know this because the bible tells us so.

Yes that should be your only stance Faith. God doesn't show us His existence by objective evidence after Jesus. You must believe by faith, Faith. John 3:16.You and all of creation science are wasting their time trying to prove God's existence. That's not how it works. Man had their chance. God showed us His existence over and over in the old testament. It didn't work. Maybe it was never meant to work. We don't know God's ways. You are wasting your time trying to prove the flood happened.I started this thread not to prove that the flood happened, only to prove that there is evidence of a flood. We just choose to ignore it. If you are a real scientist you cannot ignore all the evidence. We don't have all the evidence. I started this thread to make a point that nothing is ever proven, and that everything takes faith. To believe the sun will rise tomorrow takes faith. Atheists like to live their lives by objective evidence are wrong. The world is full of subjective things, and we all live by something subjective(love/hate). So to dismiss something merely on the fact that it is subjective is hypocritical. It is an objective fact subjectivity exists.

No True Scottsman?Creation science is research, which is part of science, but it is not real science because of it's predetermined idea of what the result should be. That doesn't mean real scientists can't use any data collected during creation science. We just can't use their conclusions.

Maybe no more wrong than anyone else. Maybe even the wisdom contained in the bible used in the right context can give you an advantage in life. Your statement is bigoted and biased.

No, it's more about whether there is evidence at all. Too many people in here say there is no evidence at all. That sounds as biased as creation science.