Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,807 Year: 3,064/9,624 Month: 909/1,588 Week: 92/223 Day: 3/17 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evidence of the flood
edge
Member (Idle past 1705 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


(1)
Message 511 of 899 (819730)
09-14-2017 10:52 AM
Reply to: Message 459 by Faith
09-13-2017 8:07 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
A lot of fat fish (as well as all kinds of other water dwellers)...
Where do you get the idea that they were fat?
Making stuff up again, Faith?
quote:
... should be caught on camera since I gather there are quite a few fossils of same in the Green River formation, and of course they should be seen in various stages of burial by these minuscule layers, right?
Why is that?
You do realize that they are only exposed by splitting the bedding planes, don't you?
I mean, why would this layering have stopped anyway?
Maybe it didn't.
What are you talking about here. Sedimentation stops for a number of reasons. Are you asking why there are different layers or why the lake dried up?
Your quesrtions are no making sense in the real world.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 459 by Faith, posted 09-13-2017 8:07 PM Faith has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1705 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


(1)
Message 512 of 899 (819735)
09-14-2017 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 451 by Faith
09-13-2017 7:03 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
These fish all by themselves prove that the varve pairs are not annual because the fish would have rotted away or been eaten within days, weeks or months of being "buried" by this minuscule amount of sediment.
So, what do you think happens when a carcass just 'rots away'? Is there nothing left over?
And what if there are no scavengers in this lake? What if the fish sank into a toxic part of the lake?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 451 by Faith, posted 09-13-2017 7:03 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 519 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:37 PM edge has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 411 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 513 of 899 (819736)
09-14-2017 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 492 by riVeRraT
09-13-2017 11:59 PM


Re: Atheistic science?
riVeRraT writes:
That doesn't mean real scientists can't use any data collected during creation science.
What data is ever collected by creationists?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 492 by riVeRraT, posted 09-13-2017 11:59 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
Aussie
Member
Posts: 275
From: FL USA
Joined: 10-02-2006


Message 514 of 899 (819749)
09-14-2017 2:20 PM
Reply to: Message 266 by Faith
09-10-2017 10:54 AM


I'm not interested in this thread...
This is the part where you begin to run away.

"...heck is a small price to pay for the truth"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by Faith, posted 09-10-2017 10:54 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 515 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:22 PM Aussie has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 515 of 899 (819750)
09-14-2017 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 514 by Aussie
09-14-2017 2:20 PM


After that I did not run away, I posted more substantially. But I may yet run away, we'll see.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 514 by Aussie, posted 09-14-2017 2:20 PM Aussie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 516 by Aussie, posted 09-14-2017 3:25 PM Faith has replied
 Message 534 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 4:44 PM Faith has replied
 Message 865 by Aussie, posted 09-20-2017 1:29 PM Faith has not replied

  
Aussie
Member
Posts: 275
From: FL USA
Joined: 10-02-2006


Message 516 of 899 (819751)
09-14-2017 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 515 by Faith
09-14-2017 3:22 PM


But I may yet run away, we'll see.
You will. It's what you do.
It's all you are capable of in this topic.

"...heck is a small price to pay for the truth"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 515 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:22 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 518 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:34 PM Aussie has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 517 of 899 (819752)
09-14-2017 3:32 PM
Reply to: Message 506 by Percy
09-14-2017 8:32 AM


Re: Millions of aternating layers Faith
Gosh most of those are me complaining about YOU guys insulting ME and you turn that against ME? Wow. And some others are me ridiculing the argument, not the person. Wow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 506 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 8:32 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 542 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 4:56 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 518 of 899 (819753)
09-14-2017 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 516 by Aussie
09-14-2017 3:25 PM


Now who's lying? I've made the argument over and over here, MADE IT, proved it, even on this thread but certainly very thoroughly on others.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 516 by Aussie, posted 09-14-2017 3:25 PM Aussie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 553 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 5:10 PM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 519 of 899 (819754)
09-14-2017 3:37 PM
Reply to: Message 512 by edge
09-14-2017 11:42 AM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
I'm happy to go back to putting Green River in the OE column. I have arguments that work, I don't need another.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 512 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 11:42 AM edge has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 521 by Taq, posted 09-14-2017 3:42 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 559 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 5:13 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 520 of 899 (819755)
09-14-2017 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 500 by Percy
09-14-2017 7:36 AM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
More generally, if sediments deposited today are not part of the geologic column, what are they part of?
Nothing, they're just sediments being deposited here and there, not part of anything.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 500 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 7:36 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 522 by Taq, posted 09-14-2017 3:44 PM Faith has replied
 Message 525 by Coyote, posted 09-14-2017 3:55 PM Faith has replied
 Message 532 by edge, posted 09-14-2017 4:30 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 582 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 5:34 PM Faith has replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 9970
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 521 of 899 (819756)
09-14-2017 3:42 PM
Reply to: Message 519 by Faith
09-14-2017 3:37 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
Faith writes:
I have arguments that work, I don't need another.
They don't work, you need another.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 519 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:37 PM Faith has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 9970
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


(1)
Message 522 of 899 (819757)
09-14-2017 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 520 by Faith
09-14-2017 3:41 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
Faith writes:
Nothing, they're just sediments being deposited here and there, not part of anything.
They just disappear? Seriously?
It seems pretty obvious that they are deposited right on top of the existing geologic column and become part of that geologic column. If you can't even admit this obvious and simple fact, then you have no leg to stand on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 520 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:41 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 524 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:48 PM Taq has replied
 Message 527 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 4:07 PM Taq has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 523 of 899 (819758)
09-14-2017 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 507 by Percy
09-14-2017 8:44 AM


Re: Again, the Geo Column shows the absurdity of the OE/ToE
Enough is enough. I've made the case many times. If you ever feel like recognizing that fact I may feel more like participating.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 507 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 8:44 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 594 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 5:42 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1444 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 524 of 899 (819759)
09-14-2017 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 522 by Taq
09-14-2017 3:44 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
The Geologic Column was formed by the Flood, the current deposits are not continuous with the deposits of that one-time event.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 522 by Taq, posted 09-14-2017 3:44 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 529 by Taq, posted 09-14-2017 4:11 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 607 by Percy, posted 09-14-2017 5:51 PM Faith has replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2105 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(4)
Message 525 of 899 (819760)
09-14-2017 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 520 by Faith
09-14-2017 3:41 PM


Re: A charming fat fish proves radiometic dating is false cuz the varves aren't annual
Sediments are being deposited all the time.
That is why you have to dust your house periodically. If you let the dust build up for a century or two you will have a layer. If outdoors that layer will be superimposed on a previous layer. If they are a similar material they will merge, but if different they will probably form distinct strata. Volcanic ash layers are good examples of this.
In grad school we worked with Mt. Manama ash layers that were very distinctive. One was about 6700 years old, and it was almost always buried a meter or two deep.
Multiply by millions of years.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
In the name of diversity, college student demands to be kept in ignorance of the culture that made diversity a value--StultisTheFool
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers
If I am entitled to something, someone else is obliged to pay--Jerry Pournelle
If a religion's teachings are true, then it should have nothing to fear from science...--dwise1
"Multiculturalism" demands that the US be tolerant of everything except its own past, culture, traditions, and identity.
Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other points of view--William F. Buckley Jr.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 520 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 3:41 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 526 by Faith, posted 09-14-2017 4:01 PM Coyote has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024