Finally, some real news about the Mueller indictments

Reporting the truth is not a conspiracy. Has it ever crossed your mind that bad presidents get criticized by people in the press?

Trump promised that everyone would be covered under a Republican health care plan, deductibles would be lower, and the coverage would be better. The bill that Trump wanted passed kicked people off of coverage, raised deductibles, and decreased what the insurance would cover. How is that fulfilling a promise?

The problem is that you call it fake news for simply reporting on stuff that is shows Trump in a bad light, and that is what Trump does as well. Did you ever watch Fox News during the Obama years? Seriously? Just like most reports on Bill Cosby are negative as of recently. Has it ever occurred to you that reports are negative because Trump is a bad president?

The biggest cable news channel blasted Bill Clinton and Obama for their entire terms, and you pretend that criticisms of Trump are a new thing. Sorry, but not buying it.Also, you are saying the press is wrong for simply criticizing the president. That shows a lot of bias. I can't take that question seriously because you claim anything critical of Trump is fake news simply for being critical.

If somebody with expertise in government and policy does criticize the president for doing badly, then it is the truth that this person has that opinion. Is the press not allowed to cite the opinions of experts?

Your opinion is wrong as shown by the fact that Mueller was given clear authority to charge people with crimes that were uncovered as part of his investigation.If a police officer is trying to bust someone with a meth lab, do you think the police officer is just going to ignore dead bodies laying around the meth lab because he wasn't given the task of investigating murders? The same applies to Mueller. It beggars belief that he would be asked to ignore crimes that he uncovers during his investigation.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

I did read it. It is a bunch of either false or unverified allegations. Crying "Clinton" or "Fake News" every time something inconvenient comes out in public isn't going to work. All it does is make Trump look guilty when he tries these underhanded tactics.

Then show me how those allegations are backed by evidence.Also, show us where Mueller is ordered to investigate Clinton in the mandate he was given by the justice department.Edited by Taq, : No reason given.

Repeating opinions does not make them facts.

Then show me the evidence instead of just alluding to it.

If Clinton "colluded with Russia" then she should get her money back. What did she get out of the deal? Unflattering emails were stolen from the DNC by Russian state sponsored hackers which were released through Wikileaks. Russian state sponsored propagandists spread fake news stories across social media that were targeted to specific voting precincts in order to help Donald win. Is this what it should look like if Clinton was colluding with Russia to influence the election?

I concur in a very non-sarcastic sense. Many of us wonder how someone can be taken in by these unfounded conspiracy theories, and it is very educational to have someone who can help us understand that process.

I am still fascinated by the underlying psychology that allows people to say such things.

We already showed that the accusations against Clinton are false, so why do you continue to act as if they are true? Do you just plug your ears and cover your eyes and hope these facts will go away?

You were already shown the truth, and you still refuse to accept it because it contradicts your beliefs. For example, the dossier was contracted through a US firm and used a UK national and former MI6 agent as one of its sources. How in the world is that "colluding with Russia"? Can you explain that?