Author
|
Topic: Y.E.C. Model: Was there rapid evolution and speciation post flood?
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 495 of 518 (823376)
11-09-2017 3:33 PM
|
Reply to: Message 487 by ringo 11-09-2017 12:26 PM
|
|
Nope. I do not have to believe the bible is wrong just because you posit some unproven claims of nature in the past. Sorry. If you knew, then we could talk.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 487 by ringo, posted 11-09-2017 12:26 PM | | ringo has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 505 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 10:42 AM | | starman has replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 496 of 518 (823377)
11-09-2017 3:34 PM
|
Reply to: Message 489 by jar 11-09-2017 12:37 PM
|
|
Re: most of us are neither utterly ignorant or utterly dishonest
You would need to be acquainted with reality to decide who is close or far from it.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 489 by jar, posted 11-09-2017 12:37 PM | | jar has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 497 of 518 (823378)
11-09-2017 3:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 490 by jar 11-09-2017 12:40 PM
|
|
Re: Starman fails
Gen 2 is after the fact, and beside the fact of the topic. Gong!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 490 by jar, posted 11-09-2017 12:40 PM | | jar has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 501 by jar, posted 11-09-2017 5:24 PM | | starman has replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 498 of 518 (823379)
11-09-2017 3:37 PM
|
Reply to: Message 491 by RAZD 11-09-2017 12:53 PM
|
|
Re: Starman fails as predicted -- fail #31
You forgot to show reasons we know there was radioactive decay on earth long ago. Sorry, I will not take your belief based wishful thinking or word for it.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 491 by RAZD, posted 11-09-2017 12:53 PM | | RAZD has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 503 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 7:00 AM | | starman has replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 499 of 518 (823381)
11-09-2017 3:38 PM
|
Reply to: Message 492 by RAZD 11-09-2017 1:15 PM
|
|
Re: the continued failures of starman, now at #32 and counting
Nothing looked for but rings eh. Ha. Show us some rings over 5000 layers deep that you think had to be laid down in this nature. No song and dance needed.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 492 by RAZD, posted 11-09-2017 1:15 PM | | RAZD has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 504 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 7:06 AM | | starman has replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 506 of 518 (823437)
11-10-2017 11:44 AM
|
Reply to: Message 500 by jar 11-09-2017 5:18 PM
|
|
Re: most of us are neither utterly ignorant or utterly dishonest
I accept the verification of the Man who rose up from being dead as evidence of His word being true. You can believe whatever you like. When I look at the iridium in the KT layer I ask myself if this stuff, which science says comes from under the earth and space...just as flood waters did by the way...is evidence for the flood. It all depends on what presuppositions and beliefs one comes in with, as to the way the evidence will appear to them.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 500 by jar, posted 11-09-2017 5:18 PM | | jar has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 510 by AdminNosy, posted 11-10-2017 11:49 AM | | starman has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 507 of 518 (823438)
11-10-2017 11:45 AM
|
Reply to: Message 501 by jar 11-09-2017 5:24 PM
|
|
Re: Starman fails
There is one statement of the creation order. Chap 2 is after the fact and not any new order. Edited by starman, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 501 by jar, posted 11-09-2017 5:24 PM | | jar has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 508 of 518 (823439)
11-10-2017 11:47 AM
|
Reply to: Message 502 by Coyote 11-09-2017 5:42 PM
|
|
Re: most of us are neither utterly ignorant or utterly dishonest
OK, let's play. Show us how dates are derived from DNA!!? When we look at the process of assigning dates we can clear up your bogus claims. Sorry that you spent years learning it, but it is not true.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 502 by Coyote, posted 11-09-2017 5:42 PM | | Coyote has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 509 of 518 (823440)
11-10-2017 11:48 AM
|
Reply to: Message 503 by RAZD 11-10-2017 7:00 AM
|
|
Re: Starman fails as predicted -- fail #34
Zip it and show the post as you were asked to, that does what you say. Why pretend?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 503 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 7:00 AM | | RAZD has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 518 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 2:30 PM | | starman has not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 511 of 518 (823442)
11-10-2017 11:52 AM
|
Reply to: Message 504 by RAZD 11-10-2017 7:06 AM
|
|
Re: the continued failures of starman, now at #35 and counting
Funny you could not post some relevant point from the link you spammed here eh? Instead, we see a pretense that somewhere else you really said things clever and relevant. Sorry, that is pretty lame. As for looking at tree rings that are beyond 5000 layers deep...let's do it. Show us some close ups and explain why the rings we will see there had to be present nature grown!? All talk, no action. Edited by starman, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 504 by RAZD, posted 11-10-2017 7:06 AM | | RAZD has seen this message but not replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 512 of 518 (823443)
11-10-2017 11:57 AM
|
Reply to: Message 505 by ringo 11-10-2017 10:42 AM
|
|
Except whining does not challenge anything I say at all. If anyone claims they have knowledge and evidence or proof that the bible is wrong they have to post it or zip it. You have not begun to do so. One cannot nag the truth away.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 505 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 10:42 AM | | ringo has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 513 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 12:05 PM | | starman has replied |
|
starman
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 514 of 518 (823453)
11-10-2017 12:15 PM
|
Reply to: Message 513 by ringo 11-10-2017 12:05 PM
|
|
What I say is that you have no evidence for a same state past that is your basis for models. That is evidenced in your repeated abject fail. I win. I see the nasty notes from Ned are starting to come He accuses me of being the one not wanting to debate. No use posting anymore as the threats of suspension against honest debaters are always carried out here, experience shows. To anyone having some actual point of discussion or debate....I will check my blog. I am suspending EVC from my posts for a few weeks or maybe forever, we'll see. end transmission
This message is a reply to: | | Message 513 by ringo, posted 11-10-2017 12:05 PM | | ringo has replied |
|