Creation

Verse one says it was created and verse 2 says it was without form. Thus, it was not complete in verse 1 because the form was yet to be determined. As I said, Jeremiah 4:28-29 says that it in the future the city would be attacked by horsemen and bowmen. Jeremiah was a prophet, after all, not a historian. There is no stop sign.

The falsehood presenter? That would be the lying sack of crap who made up statements, attributed them to me, and then tried to accuse me of lying. I said that Einstein understood that his modeling of the universe as static was an error. That particular truth is well known and documented. I doubt that even you dispute that point despite your previous couple of posts. No ICANT. That would be more pure fiction posted by you. Keep posting as you do. It reveals your character and your zeal for the truth, or at least the lack thereof.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

No.

Hi NoNukes, Yes.
Static universe = a super old earth like eternal.
BBT = and old earth. Well he did not accept the expanding universe because he created his fudge factor which much later he said was his biggest mistake. I see you forgot that part. Did I make a statement representing a fact or did I ask a question?Since when is asking a question telling a lie?God Bless,

I did not forget. I'll note that you are providing evidence for my own point rather than yours. Einstein eventually did accept the expanding universe. That's what formed the motivation for his regret, dumb ass. You did present your idea in the form of a question. And then you ended by questioning me about me about who was telling falsehoods as if your question was a statement of fact. Now go ahead and lie and say that you did no such thing.In fact, we both know that I made no claim whatsoever that Einstein espoused YEC beliefs. What I did say was that Einstein had discarded the idea that the universe was eternal, something that your own statement seemed to leave out deliberately, because you seem to know enough of the details about what Einstein actually did.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Hi ringo, There is a stop sign at the end of Genesis 1:1.
There is a stop sign at the end of Jeremiah 4:26.The Hebrew Bible was not divided into chapters and verses until 1571. Prior to that and from the Sinai there were parshiyos. which was a space in the text which was stop signs.God Bless,

space... Perhaps something more than a space is needed to make whatever your point might be.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

A parashah is similar to a paragraph break. It can be used to indicate the end of one story and the start of another but sometimes it's just a dramatic pause.

Hi NoNukes, Take a good look at my avatar and you will see what I mean about a space at the end of a paragraph.This is a picture of the Dead Sea Scrolls from 185 BC.As I said at the end of a paragraph there is a space. The ones in the picture is highlighted in yellow.This space is to separate the preceding information from the information that is to follow.God Bless,

I submit that it does not matter whether that space ends a paragraph or a chapter as far as your point is concerned. Neither of those is a reason that the two portions must be inconsistent. One reason for my conclusion is that there are indications both before and after first 4:26 that the subject matter in question is about the future and not the past.For example: No break between there and verse 26 right? Notice how I am pointing to text and making my argument based on what is there rather than trying to interpret a space?Beyond that, I would suggest this.Even if there is a break between verse 26 and 27, your suggestion that that alters the meaning in some way is just your interpretation. Your interpretation is neither required by the text nor is it a natural reading of the text. At best your argument is an excuse or an "it may be" for your interpretation. And your interpretation seems to be for the sole purpose of misreading the text of Genesis. Absent some separate reason to believe you over what is clearly on the page, I don't believe you.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Hi ringo, parashah was invented by the Masoretes to mark a specific topic for reading in the Sabbath worship.You depend on definitions that can be edited by just about anyone, too much.The spaces in the picture of the Dead Sea Scrolls was not invented by the Masoretes, as it was text that had no vowels, accents, or punctuation.To see those spaces in the Dead Sea Scrolls, just look at my avatar.God Bless,

Hi NoNukes, The subject changes at verse 22. The subject changes at verse 22 and the subject changes at verse 27.The verb ראה 'I beheld' is qal perfect meaning what Jeremiah saw was a completed event.Verse 27 is referring to a future event. You are free to believe whatever you choose to believe.But if you think I am wrong please show me where Jeremiah could have saw what he described anywhere else in the Bible.God Bless,

It is your theory and not mine that Jeremiah is describing past events. I don't need to show any such thing.

Hi NoNukes, It is not a theory.It is a fact according to the text.I can't help it if you forgot how to read.God Bless,

Hilarious. ICANT, you have zero credibility here. This entire thread is full of instances of you being wrong about assorted topics.