Summations Only

Except the many years you have been fighting the minuscule amount of evidence you can acknowledge and making up extra-biblical fantasies that are falsified by that rest of the evidence and are usually physically impossible.

You're confusing evidence and interpretation again.The entire Earth and every detail is evidence.Your quarrel should be with the mainstream interpretation.But you are incapable of comprehending or discussing that interpretation. All you have is kindergarten name calling.

End this farce. Point to where you showed that chimps and humans have distinct "body plans" in ways that the various trilobites do not. I believe that you've set the bar impossibly high, but show us where you met that standard.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

No if the layers are already deposited, removing material has to cause the layers above to sag. All the weight above would push the layers straight down into the empty space.To make the layers shown, the channels have to be eroded before the layer above is deposited. Then next layer deposited fills the channel and finishes with the flat top of the layer shown.

I'm the only one here with the correct understanding of the Bible, but that of course means that everybody else with the weird views claims I'm the wrong one.I just need to take my evidence to people who know what evidence is.

If you don't think my latest description suffices there's no point in digging up the other post where I discussed it.

I see no need to answer that pack of lies.

it normally would cause them to sag so some other explanation is needed in this case. I say it's probably the small amount of salt and the hardness of the layers above, and the fact that softer sediment did immediately fill the channels. The really saggy places I've seen were obviously just deposited by the Flood, and there was lots of salt and the entire stratigraphic column sagged as a unit.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

That's gobbledygook. If your latest description (AKA unsupported assertion) doesn't suffice the obvious thing to do is digging up the post where you discussed.Of course, in this case we know there is no discussion to dig up.

I didn't say any more in the previous post than in the latest post.

You see no need to answer that pack of lies? Let’s discuss.

quote:

---

status quo interpretation has no real evidence and is definitely all in your heads.

You're confusing evidence and interpretation again.

​

The entire Earth and every detail is evidence.

​

Your quarrel should be with the mainstream interpretation.

​

But you are incapable of comprehending or discussing that interpretation. All you have is kindergarten name calling.

---

The first three statements are simple facts.You've just proved the fourth. Again.Got anything substantive to say?Didn't think so.

The point would be to show that you have actually presented what you claim to have presented. You did not, and that is why trying to dig it up would be pointless. Nothing you've given explains here explains why the distinction between different trilobites is qualitatively or quantitatively more than differences between a chimpanzee and a human. I'll note that besides myself that there are a couple of other posters asking you the same question and you have not offered anything substantial to them either.You, ma'am, are a fraud.

Your latest post was an unsupported (and false) assertion. If there's nothing more in your previous post, then your previous post was another unsupported (and false) assertion. So you know you haven't discussed human versus chimp body plans. Your claim to have done so is a deliberate lie. Looks as if you did that to avoid revealing your ignorance and inability to support your claims any more than you already have.

But Faith’s argument is simple really.Trilobites all have the same body parts, even if they are different shapes and sizes, so they must be the same species. Chimps and humans have the same body parts but they are different shapes and sizes so obviously they are not only different species but different Kinds.

Yet time after time you have demonstrated that you do not believe the Bible says what it really says and prefer the dogma of your Cult. So once again Faith says she will run away.