Summations Only

There is a thread already Faith that helps provide the very evidence you seek. These are examples of direct evidence of millions of years. They all exist. And so far no one has been able to explain their existence in any way other than very long periods of time and the same processes we see going on today.You had a chance to present alternate explanations Faith; I created the thread just so you and others who believe like you could present your alternative models, mechanisms, methods, processes or procedures to explain the existence of the evidence but not one person has responded with anything other than song and dance and word salad.You came; you bitched and you ran away.

Which, as expected, is NOTHING, NADA, ZILCH. That is not a model, method, mechanism, process or procedure that explains how any of those formations were created. Nor is there ANY evidence that volcanism played any part in either of the Biblical Flood myths.Have you ever read the Bible Faith?As expected, there is NO explanation from anyone supporting the nonsense called a Biblical Flood.

That's yet another truly stupid post from you Faith.You are free to whine but that will never accomplish anything.OR...you could present the model, method, mechanism, process or procedure that would allow your flood to create the evidence seen in reality. Yet you never, every present the model, mechanism, process or procedure that could create the evidence that exists in reality by means of some flood or in 6000 years.The facts are that we have the fossils, the geology, the radiometric samples, the ordering AND we have the models, the mechanism, the methods, the processes and procedures that explain what exists in reality and all you have are two flood myths that are mutually exclusive and contradictory.You ain't never gonna win when you got nuttin.

That has to be one of your best really stupid posts Faith.Evidence revealed from heaven must always take second place to evidence revealed though reality. No Faith, you do not have to believe any of it, you are free to remain ignorant.

Maybe discussion is another thing you decide not to understand.In a discussion you would post: "Here is the model, method, mechanism, process or procedure that allowed the Biblical flood to create the aeolian sand dunes seen in the following picture."

What she thinks is irrelevant.The fact is that she cannot provide a single possible model, method, mechanism, process or procedure to explain the reality that is the geology, paleontology, radiometric data, isotopic data, cultural data and other things that exist in the real world.

But the conventional theories provide both the models, mechanisms, methods, processes and procedures that explain the reality that exists while you seem unable or unwilling to ever propose the models, mechanisms, methods, processes and procedures that explain how one of the Biblical Flood stories could create ANY of the evidence found in reality.A few examples might help. How did your flood create these objects? So if you can find no way that your flood could create those ten examples how can you know the flood created anything or that there even was a flood?

This series of slides might help her. It's pretty basic and addresses the Methods of Historic Science directly; none of which are to mystify the public and all of which are based on evidence that exists in reality.

The video of the Tsunami also clearly shows how a flood sorts objects and it is NOT how we find the objects sorted in most of reality.In fact the two scenarios are so different that it is immediately obvious to even a marginally trained eye whether what is seen was the result if some flood or rather simply long periods of time.

The Haploid "H" would at least explain and clarify why A dame and Eve were hanging out together.

Great.Please provide the post where you explain the model, method, mechanism, process or procedure that will allow your imaginary flood to pull a sheet of rock out of layers of rock without leaving evidence?Faith, your theories are just really really silly.

Because erections get bigger as they get older?

What was the process, procedure, model, mechanism or method that allowed your flood to sort the strata as well as those things included in the strata in the order found in reality.

How did the flood deposit material under already existing material without disturbing the older layer?Faith, you keep making assertions that the flood did things but never explain how the flood did those things.FACT: There are stone age sites all over the world and even pre-stone age sites.FACT: Those sites existed before the flood is claimed to have happened.FACT: None of those layers are more than a few tens of meters below the current surface.FACT: All of those sites were are ground/surface level.FACT: The evidence shows the site was at ground level at the time it was created by leaving evidence like fire pits and food remains and personal objects and man made objects.FACT: All of those sites were buried by known observable processes.Question: How could your flood deposit any material under an already existing layer without disturbing it?

There you go spouting the Dogma of your Cult again Faith. Are you ever going to honestly address any of the issues your utter nonsense faces?How did the flood deposit material under already existing material without disturbing the older layer?Faith, you keep making assertions that the flood did things but never explain how the flood did those things.FACT: There are stone age sites all over the world and even pre-stone age sites.FACT: Those sites existed before the flood is claimed to have happened.FACT: None of those layers are more than a few tens of meters below the current surface.FACT: All of those sites were are ground/surface level.FACT: The evidence shows the site was at ground level at the time it was created by leaving evidence like fire pits and food remains and personal objects and man made objects.FACT: All of those sites were buried by known observable processes.Question: How could your flood deposit any material under an already existing layer without disturbing it?