Christianity and the End Times

There is absolutely no explanation needed since as has been explained to you it is irrelevant to the fact that mankind has been to the surface of the moon or to the topic itself.

But there is no Fall in the Bible and what is in the Bible is God saying that eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge made man more like God; just like the serpent said it would.

No, that states a totally unsupported assertion by Paul. It does not support a Fall at all. Nor is there any evidence in the rest of the Bible to support his assertion.

But death did not enter the world because of Adam. That's just another perversion of what the Bible story in Genesis 2&3 actually says.Death existed in the world or creating the Tree of Life what just another dishonest and stupid action of the God character in the story.

There is no new or unique world view or grand purpose in the Bible and you only ask such silly questions as another way of avoiding dealing with the fact that you cannot address the thread topic no matter which thread is involved.That is a classic carny conman trick and also the trait of the Christian Cult of Ignorance and Dishonesty.The topic is Christianity and the End Times.The reality is that ALL and EVERY Biblical End Times Prophecy has failed.

But there is nothing in the Bible that talks about any ultimate goal that is unique or new to Christianity.

What is the evidence that Jesus is not a failed (Jewish) messiah?Edited by jar, : No reason given.

But what do any of those things even mean?And what is unique to Christianity?

You are just posting the Dogma of your Cult jaywill and yet more unsupported assertions and meaningless drivel. LOLThat is just utter nonsense jaywill, with absolutely no meaning whatsoever. Yes, you would say that but again, that is simply at best an example of self fulfilled prophecy and so more a conjob than any real prophesy. And that again is just you rewriting the Bible and trying to turn a truism into something significant. It's YOU adding to the Bible, a classic Apologist conjob.All you have is the classic dishonesty of taking proof texts out of context and adding dogma instead of accepting what is written.

If you can't explain what they mean then they can't be of much value or use. That's a nice assertion but only another totally unsupported assertion.

Too funny. And where is your evidence that I reject Christ or that my name is not recorded?Again, you are just trying to con the rubes and showing your ignorance jaywill.

You added the utter nonsense in brackets, like substituting science (a concept foreign to any of the authors of the Bible stories) for knowledge.In fact the vast majority of the content of the Bible you market is stuff that is added to try to make the Bible fit the dogma of your cult.And again, this is still just another example of you trying to con the rubes, move the goal posts, change the subject and avoid dealing with the topic.

The humorous part is you thinking you have a clue what might be in such a book if it existed and your continued attempts to just market the dogma of your cult rather than addressing the topic.I don't think Revelation is a lie, just that it is all simply failed prophecy that refers to events the author expected to occur almost 1900 years ago.

Editorial is adding, imposing YOUR meaning on what is actually written.And it still is just another example of you trying to palm the pea, change the subject, con the rubes and move the goal posts. LOLOf course they are failed prophecy until such time as they do happen. Your denials are just more evidence that you have no touch with reality.Edited by jar, : Add rebuttal of the attempt to deny reality

So once again you prove that you place your human wisdom above what the Bible actually says, yet claim to be a "Biblical" Christian.You place Dogma above facts and reality yet again.