Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1

So, when are you going to present these details? So you are a new ager, yes?Please present to us the spirtual properties of gold. Fire?Dirt?How do you know it is a 'fluke universe'? You have some others to compare it to?

Considering that there is not such thing as a 'mac truck' that would either be incredibly easy in your fantasy or impossible in the real world. Considering your failure to accomplish anything here, that might be a good idea.

And even more revealing when you can't do so.

Heh, heh ....For those who are interested, that's what we've been doing all along.

Oh, not much fear of that. We've been going round and round on this "alternate states argument ' for years now. It never changes. I post more for other the audience to read than for the individual.

You don't get it.This is easy: In the previous state, you could go fishing in lava lakes and catch Cambrian trout. I just love doing YEC science!

Heh, heh ...It is said by YOU, yes. The point being? According to you. Now you are going to draw some illogical conclusion? Something that has never been documented, observed or even predicted. What striations are you talking about?It's pretty clear that you have not been reading our posts. That is convenient for you but very discourteous as well as anti-science of you.You spout random words such as 'iridium' and 'striations', and even 'above' and 'below' like a child's toys in a very small playpen. You really have no understanding of them, do you?

Yes, it is Snelling, a person known for massive cognitive dissonance since he acknowledges deep time in his previous day job as an economic geologist where he worked on Precambrian uranium deposits in Australia.So, it would be easy for him to dismiss old age dates and normal plate tectonics as having changed dramatically somewhere in the past so as to befuddle all of the scientists working in these areas. That way it's easy to selectively ignore huge amounts of data.

Why would they not?Please tell us how atoms and molecules did react in a previous state and then we can have a nice discussion about it.

Okay, so you're going to show us how 'upward directed impacts' form by presenting a website that shows no such thing.You attempt to show us 'striations' related to impacts by presenting an article that says nothing about striations.You present a website that you have no capability of discussing.Thank you for confirming that your whole scenario of time, life and geological processes is based on total and unadulterated ignorance. Well, no one else here is professing these notions.In case you didn't notice.

You are evading. Answer the question. Unsupported fake premises.If this is all you have, you make a mockery of YEC. If science doesn't know something, that makes you correct. Is that your logic?Does Arkham know that you are on the loose?

All you show here is that you have not read my previous posts.This has nothing to do with shocked quartz.

Not at all.If you are going to posit an alternative state, you should give us evidence that such a thing exists or existed, or even could exist.Or you could agree that we do know of one state that actually does exist.

There is no reason not to do so. Try to wiggle out of the fact that there is no other known state of nature.

This is gibberish. What do you mean "with water"? If something were erupted from the core of the earth, it would seem that volcanologists would be involved. Actually, there were many such events, including the much younger Eltanin impact which also yielded a large harvest of iridium. I went over that in an earlier post. Please have the courtesy of reading and attempting to understand. This has nothing to do with any god. Your own posts prove that. Heh, heh ... Hadn't observed this, but we note your opinion.