Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1

Science doesn't know. This is a silence forum. Once we establish science does not know, you can move this thread over to the religious debate area!

Some of the earmarks of the great flood of Noah were that all animals and people on earth, save those on the ark all died. That qualifies as a great extinction if ever anything ever did! The water also came from space and below the earth and that is where science says iridium also comes from.

Yes. The interpretation that is wrong is that the iridium was from space object that caused the great extinction of the time.

No. Not 'something'. But science foists itself on people as more than just beliefs. That is the sin.

You have failed to defend your religion. Don't try throwing stones at superior beliefs.

Using the word reality does not make you related. Sorry. Asking us to show you some conduit to the inner earth that existed thousands of years ago only, is awfully foolish.

Let's look then if the KT layer involves any sediment!

It is not a chance/fluke universe. It is created. Intelligently. It is science that says things happened for no reason. The big bang, why did it happen in your religion? Life on earth, why did it happen in your religion, if not by random happenstance!?As for details of materials Jesus used in a project, google New Jerusalem and what materials He used to build it,

I could drive a mac truck through the gaping holes in your science/religion. I can see why you resort to obscure whining rather than join those trying to defend their faith here!But I guess it is almost time for Raz to demand that no one post anymore 'off topic'! (being defeated like the rest of y'all, what else could he do to try and save face?)So unless someone posts on topic here and something of substance, I guess I'll try to let the thread R.I.P. Ha.

Easy peasy. Detrmining when a bottleneck 'happened' is based on current genes/DNA/genetics. Unless the nature was the same, why would molecules and atoms have behaved exactly as they now do? Why would the genetics of a former nature be the very same as now?? Proof?I suspect that all DNA we have in any good shape is from the recent past and this nature.Got any from the KT era?

Let's review. You offered us some tattered/reconstructed parchment written by some unknown on the back of an actual ancient scroll, that has missing kings, many unknown kings, and a plethora of spook kings!Because some of the kings on the list actually existed, you try to use tree ring chronology that assumes fast present nature tree growth to date those kings!
You seem so desperate to use same nature past beliefs on tree rings, that you dredge up a spirit king inclusive list to try and make it appear as if the dates are good.You failed to provide any close up details on the only rings that mattered, the few hundred rings from the living tree, yet you made claims about the C14 they supposedly contain. Claims based on there having existed a same nature in the past that would have allowed the carbon to exist in nature only as it now would....etc etc.You avoid all responsibility for having to prove this nature you claim existed, and upon which ALL your religious correlations depend. You thought you could just plow along trying to explain all evidences and correlate them TO YOUR belief!I do not find it strange in any way that furniture from trees would contain the same pattern of C14 as trees from the time would!? The only issue is how C14 fit in nature and what it did, where it used to come from...etc etc..in other words C14 only has meaning in a nature we know! You have transposed the meaning from this nature to all former times for no reason.Edited by creation, : No reason given.

Great, so how about pre flood?

Origins so called sciences are beliefs used to explain evidences the godless ignorant way they prefer.

The fact remains that the biblical flood was said to have caused a great great extinction! Your fable about the KT layer also claims the same thing. The waters came from space and deep under the earth...iridium is said by science to come from there also! If the crater was left by some impact from under the earth to above, we would have the same striations etc.

No. It was to prevent the CREATED KINDS placed on the ark from dying! Who says all the animals that evolved/adapted from created kinds in the 16 centuries before the flood got to come? After all with the rapid evolution of the former nature there could even have been birds that evolved into dino, or whatever...who knows!?It also makes perfect sense that a limited number of animals (original created kinds only) went onto one single boat!