Explain to me how the fuck im meant to get layed under this atheist society?
Conclusion: You are ranting because you are emotionally/sexually frustrated and attempting to find yourself. Just remember that all of us who are older have been there. If arguing with us relieves tension...keep it up! My closing your earlier topics is not the problem. Be honest. Is my analysis anywhere close to the truth?
Chance as a real force is a myth. It has no basis in reality and no place in scientific inquiry. For science and philosophy to continue to advance in knowledge, chance must be demythologized once and for all. –RC Sproul "A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes." –Mark Twain " ~"If that's not sufficient for you go soak your head."~Faith You can "get answers" by watching the ducks. That doesn't mean the answers are coming from them.~Ringo
It must be nice to have a single group of people that you can blame for all the things you fear.
Lets kill babies, yay. Lets allow adultery and open divorce, yay. Lets allow gay matrriage, yay. Lets allow gays to expose kids to sexual material, info, etc, yay. Lets allow gays to adopt kids, yay. Lets allow kids of 8yo to choose to be gay, yay. Lets allow 8yo kids to choose to be trannies, yay. Lets encourage kids to be gay, yay. Lets give our kids puberty blockers and fund surgeries to help be trannies, yay. Lets send any man to prison on the allegation of a woman, yay. Lets make it impossible for single men to approach women, yay. Lets make it possible for women to call rape if a man doesn't do what she pleases, yay. Let's destroy relations and rewrite the rules of engagement, yay. Lets encourage promisuity in women, yay. Lets assume all men are potential killers and rapists, yay. Lets make mens lives hang on the selfishness of young atheist women that have no morals.
I think it is interesting that you are so self absorbed that you think your feelings matter more than other people's feelings.
I don't know where you live but in America we decided that if you are a citizen living in this country paying taxes, you deserve the same benefits as everyone else.
It has taken a long time to get things right and we still make lots of mistakes but we are getting there.
Judging from your rant, you seem to think that you should have all the rights guaranteed by our Constitution, but other people who do not agree with everything you believe should not have the same rights. In fact, YOU think their rights some how take away your rights.
They’ve produced a bunch of frauds which for me is also a deal breaker. What does a judge do when he learns the defendant has been dishonest? Fool me once shame on u fool me twice shame on me. The whole ToE is founded on frauds.
I'm not an athiest, but I am a mechanical engineer. Have a MS from a very fine school in Virginia (go Hokies!). While we took some science courses in school and my job does involve using scientific principals, engineering is not science. Sorry, it just isn't.
quote: Though Donald Trump promised his followers they'd win so much they'd be tired of winning, one thing that has plagued them since he first stepped on the national stage is their abject failure on the dating scene. As it turns out, for the rest of the population, being a person who thinks it's super swell to tear-gas children is kind of a bonerkiller.
There's been a slew of articles about how super hard it is for Trumpists to get anyone to date them -- and my personal favorite, an essay in The Federalist about how women were to blame for Trump because of their refusal to bone down with conservative men. Cassandra Fairbanks got banned from OKCupid for sending pro-Trump/anti-Clinton messages to people like a weirdo; Christopher "Crying Nazi" was also banned from OKCupid for ... being an actual Nazi; and Jack Posobiec, who is married, got banned from Bumble. Bumble has also banned people for fat-shaming women on their app, and has banned pictures of guns in profile photos.
It's been hard out there for these jerks, and, in response, a number of dating sites have popped up over the past two years aiming to help them out.
There was Trump Singles. There was the dating site for Trump lovers that made a convicted child molester the face of their brand. There was Donald Daters, which exposed all of its users' data the very week it launched.
And now we have Righter. Righter is a new conservative dating app created by Trump supporter Christy Edwards Lawton, who says she came up with the idea after meeting a very attractive lady at a party in New York who said no one wanted to date her because she's a Republican. Appalled that men would take something other than looks into account when choosing a prospective mate, she decided to create a dating app where women like the one she met at that party would be able to connect with other people lacking any kind of human decency or empathy. Lawton is so serious about creating a safe space for deplorables (has anyone come up with DEPLORADATE yet?) that she said the company will sue any liberals who try to sign up
Seriously biology needs to stop engaging in theological discussions before any credibility is restored.
Biology does not engage in theological discussions. Seriously!
Rather, it's the creationists who try to drag biology into theological discussions. And their idiot followers who don't know any better.
You claim to no longer be a creationist and to be an agnostic, yet you persist in regurgitating the fundamentalist Christian creationist lies. What the fuck is your problem, man?
Your beliefs are founded on frauds like piltdown man, fake horse and moth evolution, hoax embryos.
Yet more creationist lies that you still adhere to for who knows what reason.
Piltdown Man was indeed a hoax, but it was scientists, not creationists, who exposed it as a hoax. Guess what happened then? Its exposure as a hoax was widely published by the scientific community and it was immediately no longer used. Same thing with Nebraska Man whose true nature was discovered within a year, that fact immediately published, and Nebraska Man was no longer used. Except by creationists who lie about those stories.
In contrast, what about creationist hoaxes? The "shrinking sun" claim, which was refuted immediately in 1980, yet it is still very much used to creationists. Their "leap second" claim with lies about the rate at which the earth's rotation is slowing down. It appeared in 1979 and was soundly refuted in 1982, yet it continues to be one of the standard creationist young-earth claims -- indeed, when a group in Canada tried to discuss it with creationist sites, those cites continued to use it despite their now knowing it to be completely and utterly false (see An unsuccessful attempt to correct an error on young-earth creationist websites., Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 2001).
The point is that while hoaxes do happen on both sides, science has a vested interest in detecting and eliminating hoaxes, whereas creationism has absolutely no such interest. I started working on a page based on a discussion in another forum and have put that first draft up here for forum discussion such as here; it is not yet published, so please do not misrepresent it as such. I feel certain that I have pointed you to it before, so it's troubling that you still do not understand such obvious ideas.
Stick around. U closed it in only a few days. People understood what I was asking for and presented it. Thanks to them. Closing it only shows fear.
As others have already pointed out to you, instead of responding to your first topic you immediately created a second one. That tells us (but much more importantly that tells the Admins) that you had abandoned that first topic. That is a typical dishonest creationist tactic. The members here have a lot of experience with creationists and their dishonest ways. For example, I started studying "creation science" in 1981 and started discussing it on-line around 1986. We know with great certainty what a duck looks, sounds, and walks like as well as what a duck will do next. Everything you present to us identifies you as a duck. Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to demonstrate that you are not a duck. This message will self-destruct in five seconds.
Therefore, closing your first topic does not show any fear. Rather, it shows AdminPhat's decision to close your first topic since you had abandoned it in favor of a new topic which properly belongs in the ID section (Message 1024). If you sincerely want to have it reopened instead of just bitching and moaning in typical dishonest creationist manner, then request AdminPhat to reopen that topic, eg via Messaging.
I will cover the fucking weird stuff in another reply.
Oh crap! Looks like I have to slog through that slime-bog of your Message 17 as well. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that you are in Australia. That would mean that your Message 17 was posted around 1308 hr. That message certainly looks like you had been drinking, but 1308 should be too early in the day to have started drinking that much. Or else I've led a much too sheltered life, especially in reference to Australian drinking habits.
But sticking to this message of yours.
If I shouldn't listen to theists why should I listen to atheists who are preaching this crap?
O...K (while giving you the hairy eye-ball). You are saying that in response to Tangle's Message 20. I have read that message from Tangle. Every part of that message appears to me to be very reasonable, excessively reasonable given the blatantly bellicose nature of your own melt-down message (Message 17) to which he was responding.
So then, I must insist that you identify the specific parts of Tangle's Message 20 was "preaching this crap". IOW, identify said "crap" and point us directly where said "crap" was delivered by Tangle.
Even you must admit that my request is entirely reasonable.
Who have no moral boundaries?
I'm sorry, but are you repeating that stupid lie that atheists have no morals? I know where you got that nonsense from, but I thought that you were leaving that religion. Why are you holding on to their lies such as this and creationism?
Religion has nothing to do with morality. If anything, Christians are far less moral than atheists are. I recently heard reference to a public poll in the UK which found that atheists are seen as being more moral and trustworthy than Christians. Certainly in the field of "creation science" I have repeatedly witnessed creationists lying their asses off. In debates, the creationists use every dishonest trick they can to deceive the audience whereas their opponents go out of their way to present truthful information.
Please learn something and get rid of that religious baggage.
Explain to me how the fuck im meant to get layed under this atheist society?
Oh crap! You are one of those idiotic "incel" pukes -- "incel" == "involuntarily celibate". Really? You are such a loser that you want to blame the rest of the world and now want to grab an assault rifle to kill everybody just because you are such a snowflake that you are all butt-hurt that you cannot get laid (please learn a little English, OK?), that no girl finds you attractive? Really? That is the world's fault and not in the least bit your own? Really?
OK, so I'm 67 years old and was married for 28 years which ended very badly. Even with that record, I do know a few more things than you do, would you agree?
First, the most crass level. What exactly are you looking for? Just sex, no relationship? Get a hooker (AKA "prostitute", whatever your locale's slang for it is). Problem solved!
You don't want to risk getting a hooker? Jerk off! Problem solved! (and you're one of the lucky ones for whom "rubbing one out" is still exciting enough).
Oh, you want to have a relationship? OK. That is a bit more complicated, but the more that you work through it the more you will grow.
There is an intermediate stage here, assuming that you are that type of depraved immoral male, that all you are interested in is finding a vulnerable female upon whom to prey. All you want to do is to find a female whom you can drug or otherwise force into sex, or maybe she is already psychologically predisposed into being exploited (I've heard jokes about "daddy issues" which I still do not understand). Wow! What a man! A man who can only find any sexual pleasure through rape. And if you're really lucky, you'll get caught and sent to prison where you'll have all the sex you could possibly want and much more.
Now, my advice is that you get help from a female such as your sister, cousin, or good friend. Ask her to tell you why women find you so repulsive. Is it your guns, your swastika neck tattoo, your misogynist rants where you express your desire to kill them? And then have her teach you how to be more appealing and attractive to women. Maybe she can even act as a wingman to help you get started talking to girls instead of railing against them. Always remember something that too few men ever learn, that women are people too (and far more interesting).
Edited by dwise1, : Posted far too soon entirely by mistake.
Edited by dwise1, : Completed
Edited by dwise1, : Oops, forgot the thing about morality