Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is uniformitarianim still taught?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 89 (87805)
02-20-2004 7:09 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by MrHambre
02-19-2004 3:33 PM


Re: Cat-astrophism
I'm not aware of any creationist who doesn't believe that gradual, consistent processes account for the lion's share of observable geological features.
There is, in fact, a whole bunch of us and growing. If a whole lot of things on Mars are different than they were millions to billions of years ago, what about earth, sun and everything else? What has changed relative to radiometric dating, for example?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by MrHambre, posted 02-19-2004 3:33 PM MrHambre has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by NosyNed, posted 02-20-2004 8:50 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 89 (87808)
02-20-2004 7:21 PM


I read page one for first time and posted before noticing there are more pages. I'll go back and read more.

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 89 (87825)
02-20-2004 9:09 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by NosyNed
02-20-2004 8:50 PM


Re: Cat-astrophism
You could open a "What about changed processes?" or something if you wanted. There is, you know, evidence that the rates have not changed.
The question is how sound the alleged evidence, but I'll leave it at that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by NosyNed, posted 02-20-2004 8:50 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024