"JM: What about the supercontinents of Rodinia, Panottia and Columbia?"
--I have abundances of paleo/geomagnetic information, though magnetic paleography on land I have only have reliable data and information going back only to a few million years. May you have a resource which I might view such continental paleomagnetic data?
"JM: This is one of my questions to you. I want you to explain how the flood created these correlations (see TC model thread). You've made the assertion that the flood fits, I want you to show me how."
--As it pertains to basaltic geomagnetic striping, I have found it completely cooperative, though land paleomagnetic data is very relevent, and should be considered. See above.
"JM: Yes, I notice the advancement. I also notice that some very fundamental observations in geology are as germane today as they were several hundred years ago. Don't get smart-alecky in a subject where you have admitted some naivete."
--Sertaintly, though I am willing and I urge myself to enjoy exploring new information which is a neccessity in my knowledgable advancement. Of course I have allready agreed It would be ignorantly arrogant for me to pose such a comparison to your level, I am appreciative and blessed if the word should be used that I have someone such as yourself to discuss with.
"JM: That's right, so don't pretend to know more than you actually do. At the same time, you can't ignore the details that argue against your point. Hey, I am willing to be convinced that you have a better model, but you have to show it and you have to be able to discuss the details that might ruin your model. You can't explain one thing and then run off and hide."
--I agree I cannot.
------------------