Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,453 Year: 3,710/9,624 Month: 581/974 Week: 194/276 Day: 34/34 Hour: 14/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does God Really Exist???
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 167 of 305 (87969)
02-22-2004 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 165 by nator
02-22-2004 10:41 AM


Re: If and if...
That's what everybody who believes says. The problem being, of course, that every person's experience of God is purely individual.
Yes, that's true - and so that experience is not scientific proof. But what makes you dis-believe the Testimonies? Don't answer, the wiz box recalls your answer, was it:
" It's not a matter of believing you, it's a matter of convincing yourself you have had an experience " - Well, I think that's atleast similar to what you said but I can't be sure because the mind is not completely accurate when remembering things. Ofcourse that topic was concerning prayer though.
So are we believers all delusional ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by nator, posted 02-22-2004 10:41 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by NosyNed, posted 02-22-2004 11:48 AM mike the wiz has replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 169 of 305 (88023)
02-22-2004 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by NosyNed
02-22-2004 11:48 AM


Re: Delusional
Hey, Ned - I know the scientific process is based on what can be measured etc, Methodological Naturalism. But it is Schrafinator - the person, I am asking her if she thinks I am delusional. I have already said personal experiences are not scientific proof.
Would you agree that some people who think they have had an experience of God (or some gods of some kind) are, in fact, delusional? The problem is how to separate one from another.
I agree that some if not many people who think they have had an experience with God are delusional. Yet, I have heard many Testimonies of persons that show no signs of being either mentally ill/killers. There are Testimonies of people who have themselves went to see a doctor thinking that they were delusional only to find that they pass as being completely rational. Apparently 33% of the worlds people claim to be Christian, and I'm guessing they are not all delusional of whom have claimed some kind of experience. Though I do not infact know what amount out of that 33% have actually experienced something - answer to prayer/Holy Spirit/other experience. Also, an atheist gave me that figure, I cannot be sure if 33% is accurate. I will try and find the link if you wish it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by NosyNed, posted 02-22-2004 11:48 AM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by NosyNed, posted 02-22-2004 9:22 PM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 172 by nator, posted 02-23-2004 8:44 AM mike the wiz has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 174 of 305 (88141)
02-23-2004 12:57 PM


I assert that this was not DELUSIONAL and that people such as me who is being giving rent free housing becuase of this issue are not deluded at all at any time. There are clearlly assertions that such is the case.
Brad, 33% of the world say you aren't delusional.
if their basis is that you are merely Christian. I read your post and I don't think you are delusional for living rent free, I think you are lucky though!
I don't know if you are deluded or not, mike.
But if I'm really honest, I'd say the liklihood is high.
I don't think the likelihood is high. Could you atleast give me a reason as to why you think the likelihood is high?
I have only ever said I believe in the God of the Bible and I am Christian, is that because, in your opinion - I am delusional. Does that then mean that 33% of the world are also delusional?
Christianity: 2 billion
Islam: 1.3 billion
Hinduism: 900 million
Secular/Nonreligious/Agnostic/Atheist: 850 million
Buddhism: 360 million
Chinese traditional religion: 225 million
primal-indigenous: 150 million
African Traditional & Diasporic: 95 million
Sikhism: 23 million
Juche: 19 million
Spiritism: 14 million
Judaism: 14 million
Baha'i: 6 million
Jainism: 4 million
Shinto: 4 million
Cao Dai: 3 million
Tenrikyo: 2.4 million
Neo-Paganism: 1 million
Unitarian-Universalism: 800 thousand
Rastafarianism: 700 thousand
Scientology: 600 thousand
Zoroastrianism: 150 thousand
Do you remember a few years back when the "recovered memories of childhood abuse" fad swept the nation? As it turns out, many of the psychotherapists who were "helping" all of these people "recover" memories were actually implanting memories instead.
Are you saying someone has implanted Christianity into me despite my independent submission to it?
I once ran a horse farm for a woman. I gave her my notice, and was pretty clear with her about the reasons I was leaving (she was very unreasonable in her demands, she was a control freak, and the pay sucked).
I had a similar circumstance when a fellow employee insisted I was taking Christmas eve off work to get at him, he was paranoid and delusional and I indeed empathize, but how does this relate to my circumstances?
[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 02-23-2004]

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 1:11 PM mike the wiz has replied
 Message 199 by Brad McFall, posted 02-24-2004 9:59 AM mike the wiz has replied
 Message 203 by nator, posted 02-24-2004 10:35 AM mike the wiz has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 176 of 305 (88150)
02-23-2004 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by Dan Carroll
02-23-2004 1:11 PM


But I thought atheists here had argued that the Muslim God is also the God of Abraham?
Has this now changed because it doesn't fit the debate?
Either billions are delusional like you say, or infact they are on to something. Certainly lots if not all of the people you mentioned would agree God exists - even if they did get his name wrong. And to be honest Dan, you're a man of the vote aren't you - You are outvoted. Because if you are right then possibly 4.1 billion people would disagree with the delusional non-believers and infact say that I am not delusional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 1:11 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 1:37 PM mike the wiz has replied
 Message 178 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 1:39 PM mike the wiz has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 179 of 305 (88156)
02-23-2004 1:52 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by Dan Carroll
02-23-2004 1:37 PM


I'm not saying being outvoted makes you wrong. But - you are nevertheless outvoted. So all I'm saying is - I am quite confident that if a possible 4.1. billion people say I am not delusional then that satisfies me. Most here are evo' and they seem to outvote and outdo the Creo's - I don't like that and they could be wrong about evolution being true, but nevertheless, I am outvoted.
Mike... no matter what, billions of people are delusional. Whether it's about God being real, or whether Christ was the son of God or just a prophet of Allah.
To say billions are deluded is one hell of a statement. Personally, this is one of the main reasons I will never listen to the atheist or respect him/her opinion about God. No offense but too many people come to a conclusion that I am delusional and have a " invisible friend " or believe in " fairy stories ". As long as I listen to this stuff why should I pay them their dues? I also think they are delusional to say such an absurd thing as " God does not exist ". 4.1 billion would agree they have deluded their selves. Also though Dan, can you atleast show me that my Christian beliefs are delusional? You know I have said in the past that my prayers have been answered, or proved sufficiently to me. Yet you think I am delusional still? You have also and other people, offered an explanation which is insufficient in explaining some of these answered prayers. Please give me atleast a reason as to why you insist I am delusional. I have NO reason to believe you but God I DO have reason, he has kept his word concerning me!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 1:37 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by NosyNed, posted 02-23-2004 2:00 PM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 181 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 2:01 PM mike the wiz has replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 182 of 305 (88160)
02-23-2004 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by Dan Carroll
02-23-2004 2:01 PM


Unless you can show me I am delusional, and now I am apparently possibly not, why is their a chance I am if my prayers have been sufficiently answered? - I'll put it another way, do you believe I am correct about my prayers? - If not, explain sufficiently as to why I am delusional, or just ......erm, possibly delusional. Scraff has said there's a chance I could be also, I'm assuming then that I can be shown my possible error. If there is a reasonable answer as to why Christianity is wrong then I will take heed. But if this is all about possible deludutants then we are all possibly deluded, that we can agree on. Yet, can you answer me honestly - Am I deluded Dan?
Mike... no matter what, billions of people are delusional.
Can you tell me which ones or are we all - including Schraff, Ned Dan and Mike - delusional?
[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 02-23-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 2:01 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 185 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 2:50 PM mike the wiz has replied
 Message 186 by Gilgamesh, posted 02-23-2004 5:06 PM mike the wiz has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 190 of 305 (88217)
02-23-2004 7:06 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by Dan Carroll
02-23-2004 2:50 PM


Ah, good old proving a negative.Can I 100% show that it is wrong? Nope. Is there any reason I should give a rat's ass about doing so? Nope.
I didn't say prove a negative, didn't I say to simply show me how I could be wrong, or guide me concerning my possible delusion. I have only ever said that my prayers/experiences are proof for me, yet I also said:
" Yes, that's true - and so that experience is not scientific proof. But what makes you dis-believe the Testimonies? "
I don't ask you to prove Christianity wrong, I just wanted you to show me how I should believe that I am possibly delusional. Your first post said one of the three religions are going to be delusional because one has to be wrong. But what about the atheists? What about the possibility of their delusion as to there being no god/s.
Christianity is what needs to be established as true, not stricken down as false.
Sorry Dan, you've mis-understood me. I am not trying to prove my God to you. I am simply wondering if people think I am delusional without inquiring into why/how I came to believe.
It is certainly my suspicion that you are.
So you suspect I am deluded. Despite not offering any reasons as to why I should stop believing what I am supposedly, possibly being deluded by. Well, to be honest I could also suspect you are delusional following your own logic:
I said: " But if this is all about possible deludutants then we are all possibly deluded, that we can agree on. "
You said: " Yes, we certainly can. "
Therefore, following your logic I am no more/less delusional than an atheist or non-believer. I guess the game's up.
Ps. This was ofcourse a question to Schraff, I wondered if she thought I was delusional. It interest me - that's all, though, now I can hardly recall her answer.
[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 02-23-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 2:50 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 7:51 PM mike the wiz has replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 193 of 305 (88230)
02-23-2004 8:11 PM
Reply to: Message 192 by Dan Carroll
02-23-2004 7:51 PM


I've acknowledged somewhere in the neighborhood of fifteen billion times that I could be wrong about my beliefs. If you'd like it said again, in big fat capital letters, with punctuation after each word, here it is: I. COULD. BE. WRONG.
Okay already. Fair enough. It's just that you Ned and Schraff all seemed to be saying or atleast implying an answer to my question " Am I deluded " as being " yes ". Or atleast you and Schraff anyways. Okay, fair enough we could all be deluded. I'm glad you've been honest with me, maybe people have gone and ran with the question to Schraff, it was a quick thought as I wondered if she would answer, I seem to recall her avoiding a similar question in the past.
No, I said (again) that if any of the three are correct, then the followers of the other two are delusional, because all three say that the other two are incorrect.
That's fine. All I was saying is that there is a possibility that we are on to something with this God stuff and that, that is a big statement to call all of us deluded, let's not miss out the atheists possible delusions. But fair play - you've been honest.
If you would like the reasons why I don't think I am, I heartily encourage you to put your Fretwell-stylins down, go read the rest of the thread, and respond to what I've said.
Fretwell-stylins? clarify. Ofcourse I have not read all of this thread, I don't think I have read any posts of yours except when they referred to me.
If you would like to tell us why you believe, feel free. But until you do, how am I supposed to know why? What's with the secrecy? Lay it on us, man! But don't expect me to understand why you believe when you haven't told me why you believe.
Well, this is part of my point to someone else. To claim possibility of me being delusional without knowing my exact circumstances is a bit premature if not unscientific. I'll admitt secrecy - yes. And I certainly would not test my God with silly things like " pick a number ". To be honest, I don't even ask for stuff hardly ever unless I think it is needed. Maybe in future I might divulge but I do not seek negative input with important beliefs of mine.
Read the thread, Mike. I gave my case. Refute mine, give yours, or get off the stage and give someone else a turn.
Hehe, you know very well that the logical wiz box was born to get on your nerves man. I'll get off the stage, but I only stayed on it because so many people got involved in the whole delusion thing. Maybe it was a momentary lapse of reason to continue. Post 190, did make sense though, I don't see what was wrong with that post, as I combed over everything I had previously said. I was only asking for a reason as to the claims of my possible delusion afterall.
[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 02-23-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 192 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-23-2004 7:51 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-24-2004 10:15 AM mike the wiz has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 205 of 305 (88376)
02-24-2004 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by Brad McFall
02-24-2004 9:59 AM


Re: Mike is like...
because even if 33 out of 100 say I displayed delusional behavor 66 could in equity no matter the asset say I presented NOT the same even If i was 100% sure I was correct.
Brad, I'm ready to drop the whole delusional argument. I don't know if you are/aren't delusional. Dan said it is possible that everyone is delusional, therefore we all stand a chance of being and so then - nobody (atheists) can say I am delusional if they stand an equal possibility/chance of being delusional. I read your post - I think I know some of what you meant but basically you lost me at the third paragraph.
I only said 33% would say you are not delusional CONCERNING your belief in God.
Interestingly though, nobody mentioned that infact the Jews believe in the same God as Christians - so that's nearly half the world that could possibly be ..........Nah, I won't say it. I hereby get off the stage.
Schraf'
I'm sure I have mentioned the extreme unreliability of such claims to you in the past. The liklihood of confirmation bias, post-hoc reasoning, and wishful thinking is huge, with the result being self-deception.
Yes, now I remember - though to be honest Schraff, sometimes wishful thinking cannot have an effect on reality. If I ask for something in prayer - and it happens shortly after - are you saying wishes come true? As I do not rcall having any Luke Skywalker " force " powers. Self - deception - Even the prayers being answered would rule it out - especially prayer after prayer after prayer coming true. Post - Hoc reasoning? Your spinning my wizbit.
--------------------------------------------------
'Mike is or is not I keep the ike mike hot...' - Brad Mcfall , .
[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 02-24-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by Brad McFall, posted 02-24-2004 9:59 AM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-24-2004 12:14 PM mike the wiz has replied
 Message 207 by Brad McFall, posted 02-24-2004 12:28 PM mike the wiz has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 210 of 305 (88433)
02-24-2004 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by Dan Carroll
02-24-2004 12:14 PM


Re: Mike is like a bad smell that wont go away
Mike - But if this is all about possible deludutants then we are all possibly deluded, that we can agree on.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan - Yes, we certainly can.
---------------------------------------------
I am not mis-representing you Dan, as you can see above you agreed we are all possibly deluded. So what is so bad about me saying:
" Dan said it is possible that everyone is delusional, therefore we all stand a chance of being. "
You insist I read your posts concerning this, yes?
All I am doing is saying what has happened so far. I do not seek to twist your words you know. Also, I've got off the stage and tried to give you the last word on this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-24-2004 12:14 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-25-2004 9:57 AM mike the wiz has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 233 of 305 (88870)
02-26-2004 3:32 PM
Reply to: Message 230 by Phat
02-26-2004 10:45 AM


God made us we made gods
She might have a point but to be honest I've heard this one too many times from the old "less of a chance" deludants. In other words, it's a good idea, but it's guesswork. Maybe people did make gods to help them with death, idols etc. - And the real God made us. Certainly that would fit the physical history of idolatry. I mean - why invent an invisible God? History shows that people prefer to make their gods.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 230 by Phat, posted 02-26-2004 10:45 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by nator, posted 02-26-2004 3:42 PM mike the wiz has replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 236 of 305 (88879)
02-26-2004 3:50 PM
Reply to: Message 234 by nator
02-26-2004 3:42 PM


Re: God made us we made gods
Wow. You see the logic of my statement and reject it anyway.
I see you idea but why make a God that you know doesn't exist? How will that comfort you if you know it's not true anyway. Remember, the first person to "invent" would ofcourse know he/she was inventing, I find this hard to believe though Schraff because the "inventor" would have invented, it would then only be the next people to believe who really would take comfort. And besides this, why not make, as in - physically, a "comforter" rather than trying to convince people of an invisible God which you cannot point at and say "look, there he is" ? I see your your "idea" as a fair point but it has it's problems.
Certainly I see your 'logic' as okay, and my God doesn't require that I deny your idea, I just don't think it applies to God. Your idea is certainly a possibility though, because there have been an awful lot of idols found throughout history. Do not dis-believe in God because of me.
[This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 02-26-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 234 by nator, posted 02-26-2004 3:42 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 239 by nator, posted 02-27-2004 10:46 AM mike the wiz has replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 240 of 305 (89041)
02-27-2004 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 239 by nator
02-27-2004 10:46 AM


Re: God made us we make debates
The concept of God likely began, as I've said, to explain powerful and bewildering occurrences in the lives of early humans. In our effort to figure out why stuff happened the way it did (Why does the water fall from the sky? Why does the mountain explode and rain fire upon us?
So it wasn't inventing them to seek comfort? As that would require inventing. I know what you are saying and YES - maybe to your surprise, I see your logic. But don't rule out God because of potentially invented or "to explain phenomena" gods. A thing that really mystifies me is the length people have went to in the past - the Pyramids for example. I admire the power of their belief to actually be this Creatively inspired - but I am biased being creative myself.
Don't worry, Mike. I don't know if God/gods exist or not, and neither does anyone else.
It did dis-please me when you said you want no part of God because of me. I would indeed look upon that as my fault, and would have failed to preach properly. I mean, the last thing I would want is for me to cause such a thing. That would be a complete failure for me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 239 by nator, posted 02-27-2004 10:46 AM nator has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 297 of 305 (103505)
04-28-2004 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by crashfrog
04-28-2004 6:52 PM


Think of time as the thing that keeps everything from happening all at once.
Why would that be needed in a chance universe? What's the point in "time". Time itself indicates that God exists. --> Boy am I on topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by crashfrog, posted 04-28-2004 6:52 PM crashfrog has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 300 of 305 (103536)
04-28-2004 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 299 by Zurahn
04-28-2004 7:02 PM


"Heaven and earth shall pass, but my words shall never pass".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by Zurahn, posted 04-28-2004 7:02 PM Zurahn has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024