Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,352 Year: 3,609/9,624 Month: 480/974 Week: 93/276 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Annunaki Theory
CelticShadow
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 42 (92479)
03-14-2004 7:27 PM


As I was reading the post below (Is mans theory of human evolution clouded from the truth?) I was wondering to myself who would go to such great lengths as to cause so much information to be released without putting the facts into the pot.
The fact is the Annunaki theory really isn't that hard to believe.
The Earth Chronicles that Annunaki listed in the previous post is just the tip of the ice burg of information Sitchin had to offer.
For all of those who does not know.. Sitchin is a linguist and anthropologist in command of many ancient languages, who has had more success in Sumerian text.
To date, Sitchin has deciphered more then 2,000 clay cylinders from the Persion Gulf that has existed some 6,000 years ago. Some of these fragments, which date to 4,000 B.C., are in museums around the world. But, one fragment in particular, presently in Germany, indicates that Earth is the seventh planet, counting in from Pluto. The time frame here is four millennia before modern astronomy confirmed the existence of Pluto as an actual planet in our Solar system. So how did an ancient race of people know this fact? Sitchin says it is because these ancient poeple did not come from Earth, but from Nibiru. Profound family squabbles eventually caused the Annunaki to abandon planet Earth, leaving human beings to fend for themslves. These early humans would never possess the ability to ravel amount the stars like their creators, nor would they possess the immortailty of their creators. Eons later, however, we humans finally have sent an intelligently designed satellite probe beyond the confines of our solar system. Are we repeating our past? This is but one of the perplexing questions Sitchin investiages in the Earth Chronicles. Not only an eminent archeologist, Sitchin is also foridable analyst of ancient cultures, in fact, perhaps the best ever.
Maybe this best explains the information.. plesae ask questions.. I have researched this topic for 2 years now.

CelticShadow
Future Anthropologist

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminAsgara, posted 03-14-2004 7:38 PM CelticShadow has not replied
 Message 39 by Watson75, posted 09-18-2008 2:15 AM CelticShadow has not replied

  
CelticShadow
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 42 (92844)
03-16-2004 10:43 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Chiroptera
03-16-2004 12:02 PM


Nibiru has many other names, in the Bible, for instance, they call the Planet Wormwood the place that Satan himself came from.
You guys have to realize that the Jewish people, the orginal scripters of the Bible, is a branch of the Sumerians.
Sumerian text dictates that one year on planet Nibiru, a sar, was equivalent in time to 3,600 Earth years. They also said Anunnaki lifespans were 120 sars which is 120 x 3600 or 432,000 years. According to the King List 120 sars had passed from the time the Anunnaki arrived on Earth to the time of the Flood. However when the Lofty Ones came to Earth their lifespans began to sync with Earth's faster orbit and they faced rapid aging compared to that on Nibiru. Einstein's theory of General Relativity says celestial body gravity and motion warps local space/time. They discovered that by eating food from their home planet they could keep the aging process synced to the pace of Nibiru.
Also, scientists thoerize that the Tenth planet has a elipical orbit, if this is becomes a fact it means that Planet X moves in and out of our Solar System which would be why we haven't discovered a specific path, and can only speculate. According to Sumerian text Nibiru was suppose to enter back into our Solar System last year around March. Now, one of two things can be happening. Nibiru has already entered our Solar System and we don't know about it, or translations from the Sumerian tablets have been misread and mistranslated. My guess that Sumerian text has been mistranslated, not by the lack of abilities to translate the material, but the fact that Sumerian time may be different from our own.
In the early 1990's, calculations by the United States Naval Observatory have confirmed the orbital perturbation exhibited by Uranus and Neptune, which Dr. Thomas C Van Flandern, an astronomer at the observatory, says could be explained by "a single undiscovered planet". He and a colleague, Dr. Robert Harrington, calculate that the 10th planet should be two to five times more massive than Earth and have a highly elliptical orbit that takes it some 5 billion miles beyond that of Pluto.
We know today that beyond the giant planets Jupiter and Saturn lie more major planets, Uranus and Neptune, and a small planet, Pluto. But such knowledge is quiet recent. Uranus was discovered, through the use of improved telescopes, in 1781. Neptune was pinpointed by astronomers (guided by mathematical calculations) in 1846. It became evident that Neptune was being subjected to unknown gravitational pull, and in 1930 Pluto (was located). The latest advances in space imaging do not rely solely on orbital perturbations as the way for locating and identifying possible candidates for Planet X.
The 6,000 year old Sumerian descriptions of our solar system include one more planet they called "Nibiru", which means "Planet of the crossing".The descriptions of this planet by the Sumerians match precisely the specifications of "Planet X" (the Tenth Planet), which is currently being sought by astronomers in the depths of our own Solar System. Why has Planet X not been seen in recent times? Views from modern and ancient astronomy, which both suggest a highly elliptical, comet-like orbit, takes Planet X into the depths of space, well beyond the orbit of Pluto. We discovered Pluto with our telescopes just recently in 1930.
Is it not possible that there are other forces at work on our solar system besides the nine planets we know of? YES!!!! The Sumerian descriptions of Our Solar System are being confirmed with modern advances in science.

CelticShadow
Future Anthropologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Chiroptera, posted 03-16-2004 12:02 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
CelticShadow
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 42 (93061)
03-18-2004 1:06 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Spencer
03-17-2004 12:29 AM


Actually the 1930s in a scientific stand point is recently.
Also, If Nibiru has such a ellipical orbit then we theorize that something else besides our Sun is pulling the planet into such a shape. Maybe... just maybe when Nibiru gets past Pluto and Sedna, and if it does go into a different Solar System, then maybe it goes around another sun, similiar to our own.
My point is that we don't know... we can only speculate from ancient text. Our technology isn't as good as you think it is, we can only see so far with any telescope and beyound Sedna we haven't a clue what is out there. You have to remember that groups of stars are different Constellations, who knows whats exactly in those Constellations... heck there might be another Solar System with a similar planet like ours called Oceania where all the people have fins and swim instead of walk.
Also, according to Sumerian description of the Annunaki they where supposely Reptile based. Some even described the Annunaki as Dragons (The Annunaki Theory just isn't in the Sumerian culture, but from the Babylonian, Egyptian, and Persian culture) We know from a scientific stand point that when it gets called Reptiles hibernate. Maybe that is what happens?
Nobody really knows, and intil then we can only make speculations even if they seem untrue. Mars at one point supposely had life, and running water.. what happen there?

CelticShadow
Future Anthropologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Spencer, posted 03-17-2004 12:29 AM Spencer has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Gary, posted 03-18-2004 5:52 PM CelticShadow has not replied
 Message 12 by Cthulhu, posted 03-18-2004 6:34 PM CelticShadow has not replied

  
CelticShadow
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 42 (93062)
03-18-2004 1:07 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Spencer
03-17-2004 12:29 AM


{Duplicate of previous message - Adminnemooseus}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 03-18-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Spencer, posted 03-17-2004 12:29 AM Spencer has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024