Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where are the young earthers?
JonF
Member (Idle past 186 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 106 of 111 (98195)
04-06-2004 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by funkman
04-06-2004 4:42 PM


Re: The facts are neutral, but...
JonF has posted a challenge to this notion that "all the scientific data is there, it's just that Creationists merely interpret the facts differently.".Here he gives you a view of a meander in the Grand Canyon. How does a creationist interpret this evidence? Can it really be used in favor of the Biblical flood?
See this article for an explanation of how a creationist might explain this meander.
http://www.amazingdiscoveries.org/flood-p3.html
This article puts forth the notion that these meanders are actually a proof more of a flood than of a slow erosion over time.
Yes, a typical creationist "explanation". A wild claim, no references, no data, no discussion, no reasoning
A "huge canyon formed at Kanab Creek in a few hours during a recent flood. This river is also a meander." with no further reference. An explanation would include a discussion of why the author thinks the Kanab creek is the same as the Grand Canyon, and comparisons of the geology and the streams involved, with data and references to more information. Without that it's just blowing smoke.
Slow erosion would actually cause the meanders to gradually disappear.
No. Slow erosion incises meanders. Fast erosion does not produce meanders. If there are meanders already present, incised in rock (not soft sediments), fast erosion can cut them deeper ... in a characteristic manner that's not seen in the meanders of the Grand Canyon.
Of course, if the Grand Canyon was produced in a few days/weeks by the drainage of a global flood, there would have been no preexisting meanders, and no meanders would have been created.
Has this notion been refuted? I honestly don't know. I'd be more than happy to take a look at whatever articles you can find that would refute this.
Try a basic geology textbook, especially "incised meanders".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by funkman, posted 04-06-2004 4:42 PM funkman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by TrueCreation, posted 04-06-2004 8:39 PM JonF has replied
 Message 109 by RAZD, posted 04-06-2004 9:40 PM JonF has not replied

TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 107 of 111 (98227)
04-06-2004 8:39 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by JonF
04-06-2004 7:20 PM


Re: The facts are neutral, but...
quote:
No. Slow erosion incises meanders. Fast erosion does not produce meanders. If there are meanders already present, incised in rock (not soft sediments), fast erosion can cut them deeper ... in a characteristic manner that's not seen in the meanders of the Grand Canyon.
[emphasis mine]
--Do you know of any published geological research on this? It sounds more like an issue that only a YEC would look into.
Cheers,
-Chris Grose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by JonF, posted 04-06-2004 7:20 PM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 108 by JonF, posted 04-06-2004 8:55 PM TrueCreation has not replied

JonF
Member (Idle past 186 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 108 of 111 (98230)
04-06-2004 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by TrueCreation
04-06-2004 8:39 PM


Re: The facts are neutral, but...
Do you know of any published geological research on this? It sounds more like an issue that only a YEC would look into.
IIRC Strahler discusses it in "Science and Earth History", which is a couple of decades old and has the worst typography known to Man, but has loads of references. There's more but I don't have the references.
There's some interest in the effects of fast-moving water in mainstream geology

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by TrueCreation, posted 04-06-2004 8:39 PM TrueCreation has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 109 of 111 (98242)
04-06-2004 9:40 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by JonF
04-06-2004 7:20 PM


Re: The facts are neutral, but...
A "huge canyon formed at Kanab Creek in a few hours during a recent flood. This river is also a meander." with no further reference.
More than that, the growth in the creek is several years old, and looks to be a mature development for the ecosystem there. This channel is not recently carved in that form, period.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by JonF, posted 04-06-2004 7:20 PM JonF has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1423 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 110 of 111 (98254)
04-06-2004 10:14 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by johnfolton
04-06-2004 6:19 PM


Re: Outside is too big, Inside is too small.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by johnfolton, posted 04-06-2004 6:19 PM johnfolton has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 111 of 111 (98311)
04-07-2004 1:43 AM


Teminally off-topic
Going to close it down. If anyone wishes to revive it, on topic, post at message at the "too fast closure" topic, link below. Topics can be re-opened.
Adminnemooseus
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 04-07-2004]

Comments on moderation procedures? - Go to
Change in Moderation?
or
too fast closure of threads

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024