Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Small Observation Concerning YEC Debate Tactics
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6521 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 1 of 4 (134993)
08-18-2004 3:33 PM


I posted this here because I don't intend this to be a serious, or long topic. This is just a quick observation about YEC arguments that I would like to make.
I think it's funny how Yec's to so easely say things like C14 decay hasn't remained reletively constant, or techtonic movement, erosion, genetic diversification, etc. They will gladly assume nature slamed on the breaks and shifted gears rapidly and without warning, and yet, when it suits their means they will asume the oposite.
Here is an examples:
They will say that the grand canyon was formed in the flood, as well as everest, etc. Due to amazing techtonic activity. When we site no evidence for the plates to shift so suddenly, they say "how do you know they didn't move faster back then, you weren't there!".
Yet, when it comes to peoples current population after the great "wipe-out", they say "If it weren't for the flood, the world would be so overpopulated, it would be unlivable".
Of cource, they are assuming, human reproduction/death rates stayed constant since the days of Noah.
Just something I found a bit humerous.
This message has been edited by Yaro, 08-18-2004 02:34 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Loudmouth, posted 08-18-2004 3:48 PM Yaro has not replied
 Message 3 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-18-2004 4:55 PM Yaro has replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 4 (134999)
08-18-2004 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yaro
08-18-2004 3:33 PM


quote:
When we site no evidence for the plates to shift so suddenly, they say "how do you know they didn't move faster back then, you weren't there!".
And the bigger question is how do creationists know that the plates didn't move SLOWER than they do now. One second they claim that we can't know anything about the past, and the next moment they offer pseudo-scientific studies that supposedly absolutely prove that the flood happened. You are right, it is inconsistent in the extreme.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yaro, posted 08-18-2004 3:33 PM Yaro has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 3 of 4 (135017)
08-18-2004 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Yaro
08-18-2004 3:33 PM


A lite topic, but the topic title is still pretty worthless
Regardless of the nature of the topic, a title that defines what it is is most desirable.
Might you suggest a better topic title?
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Yaro, posted 08-18-2004 3:33 PM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Yaro, posted 08-19-2004 10:22 AM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6521 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 4 of 4 (135215)
08-19-2004 10:22 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Adminnemooseus
08-18-2004 4:55 PM


Re: A lite topic, but the topic title is still pretty worthless
Sorry, I have been called on this twice already.
I will try to give my titles more thoughts in the future. How about:
An Small Observation Conserning YEC Debate Tactics
{Change done (the original title was something like "A Small Observation") - Adminnemooseus}
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 08-24-2004 01:54 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-18-2004 4:55 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024