|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total) |
| |
popoi | |
Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Christianity's public image problems | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
A group calling themselves The Barna Group have recently been looking into the public image of Christianity...what people's perceptions of it are etc. The Barna Group is a Christian association whose aim is to 'partner with Christian ministries and individuals to be a catalyst in moral and spiritual transformation in the United States.'
They have titled their article based on these findings, "A New Generation Expresses its Skepticism and Frustration with Christianity" and some of its findings are rather interesting. It appears to be a summary of the findings published in a book called unChristian - and given the discussion What Is A Christian (Remix) I thought EvC might be interested in exploring it. I figured it was suitably diversionary to warrant its own thread and I believe Coffee House is the most suitable place. Admins - feel free to move it if you feel it is errantly placed. Directors - feel free to append it to the other thread if you think it best.
quote: quote: Source of above quotations It seems as though the anti-homosexual rhetoric of the public faces in Christianity has become a source of disenfranchisement amongst young Americans Christian and non-Christian alike. If we assume for the moment that the TruthTM is that homosexuality is a sin, then we can say that its recent overemphasis is hampering efforts to spread the WordTM. Time for a new tactic, methinks. I'd assume that means a changing of the guard for Christianity. Perhaps we shall have to wait for the younger generation of Christians to step forward as public ministers...but is the damage done, is a quick recovery possible? If the more moderate Christians are being turned off, does that mean the population of Christians that remain have an increased frequency of the judgemental variety? Religious selection seems to be in play, which tactic will we be left with when it reaches equilibrium? Food for thought for some of our members, perhaps. In the interests of full disclosure: The Barna Group is a protestant group; I have not examined the methodology of the study to determine its validity Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Added "Source of above quotations" link. No - I don't believe a cosmic Jewish zombie can make me live forever if I eat his flesh and telepathically tell him that I accept him as my master, so he can then remove an evil force from my soul that is present in all of humanity because a dirt/rib woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree about 6,000 years ago just after the universe was created. Why should I?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
dwise1 Member Posts: 5930 Joined: Member Rating: 5.8 |
FWIW, I first and last heard of the Barna Group back in 1991 when an AP article about a poll they did about what Americans believe appeared in the newspaper. I reposted it at No webpage found at provided URL: http://members.aol.com/dwise1/religion/survey.html.
The entire article here, since it's not too long:
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3291 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Modulous writes:
I don't see this as any kind of a problem for christianity, considering the fact that the overwhelming majority, if not most, people in the US are still christians. Regardless of what the public image is, it will remain a powerful force against human rights for many generations to come. They have titled their article based on these findings, "A New Generation Expresses its Skepticism and Frustration with Christianity" Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Damouse Member (Idle past 4905 days) Posts: 215 From: Brookfield, Wisconsin Joined: |
I don't see this as any kind of a problem for christianity, considering the fact that the overwhelming majority, if not most, people in the US are still christians. Regardless of what the public image is, it will remain a powerful force against human rights for many generations to come. heh heh heh ouch. That nonwithstanding, christianity is on a recession to what it once was. Speaking from the perspective of the RC church, numbers are way down on everything, and all across the board church attendace is not what it used to be. A powerful force, indeed, but on its way out imho. This statement is false. Yeah so i lurk more than i post, thats why my posts are so low for two year's worth of membership. So sue me.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cypher227 Junior Member (Idle past 6005 days) Posts: 5 Joined: |
It seems to me that Christianity is going through some kind of death throes. Not that I'm issuing some kind of doom prophecy for Christianity, the system took 1250-1500 years to reach its zenith and its fall may take just as long. I think these public image problems are symptoms of a deeper issue.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2477 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
Damouse writes: A powerful force, indeed, but on its way out imho. Indeed. About 75% of Americans are self-described Christians. If the loss of religion continues at the rate it's been going at, they'll be a minority in the middle of this century. Here in the U.K., I heard on the radio a few days ago that a whopping 6% of the nation's babies are being baptized. This is down from 15% in the 1990's.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3291 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
Damouse writes:
While I have no doubt that most religions will ultimately go belly up, I don't think christianity is on its way out anytime soon. Yes, the number of nonbelievers are higher than ever before, but so is the overall population.
A powerful force, indeed, but on its way out imho. Speaking from the perspective of the RC church, numbers are way down on everything, and all across the board church attendace is not what it used to be.
I suspect that the younger generation catholics are more drawn to other denominations because of their specific appeal to their age group. The christian youth group that I belonged to in college before I turned atheist recruited a significant number of former catholics.
That nonwithstanding, christianity is on a recession to what it once was.
I think the appearance of recession come from the fact that witch hunts are no longer allowed and that the RC church has lost most of its political power in the world. Scratch that, I think they lost direct power. But now that the western world has pretty much turned one form or other of democracy, christianity as a whole is still retaining most of its power through the voting system. Think about it. You can't get voted into office without constantly telling people you believe in god and you pray everyday. Disclaimer: Occasionally, owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have used he/him/his meaning he or she/him or her/his or her in order to avoid awkwardness of style. He, him, and his are not intended as exclusively masculine pronouns. They may refer to either sex or to both sexes!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minnemooseus Member Posts: 3941 From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior) Joined: Member Rating: 10.0 |
No one has said such before in this topic, so I'll state what is probably the obvious - Much of the cited perceptions about Christians are probably about certain prominent examples. Mostly the Christian right wing. Much of Christiandom is less extreme and flying below the radar.
Moose
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Damouse Member (Idle past 4905 days) Posts: 215 From: Brookfield, Wisconsin Joined: |
@ Taz.
My only observed differance from the Former christian faith and the current is a whole lot more intermediaries. I think i can safely say that the number of aetheists has gone upwards at some sort of steady rate for quite some time, but i think the amount of fundemental-to-the-roots christians has dropped dramatically, and most have become IDers or otherwise-faithed christians. The weight of the evidance is increasingly on the opposite side of religion, and i dont think that that isnt registering in the population. Then of course is the "quasi-christians". They may call themselves christian and put that on all their offical forms but they dont practice or dont specifically adhere to a certain system of beliefs, they are religious only in name. My general train of thought is that these people, and the children of these people are more likely to move away from christianity over the children of a fundy catholic family. Maybe slow, but i would argue that the balance is shifting away from blind adherance in religion. Someone once argued that the aetheist movement is at the same place the gay movement was 10 years ago; that it will only take one outcry, one large snowball effect to begin to pick up speed. Edited by Damouse, : No reason given. This statement is false. Yeah so i lurk more than i post, thats why my posts are so low for two year's worth of membership. So sue me.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AnswersInGenitals Member (Idle past 150 days) Posts: 673 Joined: |
I don't doubt that the results of this survey are true, but I certainly would not rely solely on this Barna group to present the facts accurately. This survey is just too self serving for them. They are in the business (spelled with capital $$'s) of helping churches attract or retain (paying) members so that these results would tend to scare churches into believing their (the Barna group's) services were needed. Surveys that rely on the results of 1000 respondees to telephone interviews, and that is about all of them, are very suspect. They are far too weighted towards people who are willing, or dumb enough, to answer personal questions from a total stranger over the phone. That's why I give no credence to polls that continually show that about 10% of Americans are atheists. These polls also use phone interviews usually using automatic dialing systems and are thus limited to people who don't have the skills and intelligence to install a telezapper, i. e., they automatic exclude most atheists.
Edited by AnswersInGenitals, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2169 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
The Barna folks are a great resource for those of us debating with Christians who hold inaccurate, rose-tinted ideas of Christianity.
I found a great study by them that showed that in America divorce rates are highest among strict, conservative Christian sets and lowest among Catholics, and Atheists and Agnostics. As for the points you raise about the future of Christianity, I think that what will happen is what has always happened; religions change, and possibly go extinct, in response to the larger culture. Evolutionary change, as it were.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I think that it is not simply interesting, but it is also very encouraging. It also seems to be supported by "Facts on the Ground".
The general image of Christianity is that it is judgmental, hypocritical, too political and out of touch with reality and that image seems to be a direct reflection of the Truth™ of Christianity as so often practiced and marketed in the US. The encouraging things is that as that perception takes hold, particularly among Christians themselves, perhaps a new reformation will take place. There are many indications that is exactly what is happening. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2169 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Er, either the results are true, or they aren't. What about the presentation of these true facts do you think is misleading?
quote: Again, can you point out where the flaws are in their analysis?
quote: When phone surveys are independently verified to judge their accuracy, they are, for elections to give one example, shown to be accurate within a few percentage points.
quote: Here's a report of a US Census survey of 50,000 people that showed that about 8% of Americans are non-believers. The thing is, do you think that the people conducting telephone surveys haven't already come up with the issues you have raised as well as others?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Modulous Member Posts: 7801 From: Manchester, UK Joined: |
I don't doubt that the results of this survey are true, but I certainly would not rely solely on this Barna group to present the facts accurately. This survey is just too self serving for them. They are in the business (spelled with capital $$'s) of helping churches attract or retain (paying) members so that these results would tend to scare churches into believing their (the Barna group's) services were needed. Agreed.
Surveys that rely on the results of 1000 respondees to telephone interviews, and that is about all of them, are very suspect. They are far too weighted towards people who are willing, or dumb enough, to answer personal questions from a total stranger over the phone. Refusal rates are often high, and refusal rates are often one of those pieces of data that are neglected to be mentioned.
That's why I give no credence to polls that continually show that about 10% of Americans are atheists. These polls also use phone interviews usually using automatic dialing systems and are thus limited to people who don't have the skills and intelligence to install a telezapper, i. e., they automatic exclude most atheists. Perhaps. I'm not sure on the methodology used in this paper, however I do know that most of the people they spoke to were not Christian. According to usatoday: "The findings were based on surveys of a sample of 867 young people. From that total, researchers reported responses from 440 non-Christians and 305 active churchgoers." - I'd certainly agree that their sample size is small - but it doesn't look like they employed the random ringing around tactic. However, it does raise other questions...such as how random was their sample, exactly? To me it looks like they asked about 20 people from each state - which doesn't seem particularly useful, but as I noted in the OP, I haven't got the materials necessary to examine potential flaws in the methodology.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024