If this was a mineral it would be quartz but it was::
wEll I guess I was still collecting fiddleheads for Phillip Johnson was mistaken to think that what comes now was already available on the philsophy of science level. If you are not converted beware of a twist with every period. I am not really this good a trying author for the man the text reveals.
This is the rossette stone ANNE found but Jack spat it out.
In high school I wrote: Honest Anne, this is what is on the paper::
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4. Philosophy of Science
A. Things that got me into philosophy [added at some later date--THE WANT TO BE ABLE TO INTEGRATE WHATEVER I DO INTO A LARGER PICTURE]
1. Not want to be narrowminded and so specialized like ?{Ucom??} wanted to.
2.Is Science valid?
If man is to make some scientific theory about how he works it will have to be able to explain the many varied activities of the human race. Including ethics, common sense, religion, culture ec. How can such a theory be so all encompasing?
B.[added at a later date -- HOW A SET ABOUT LEARNING PHILOSOPHY] Ordination as Elder
1. sense of Religion I wouldnt have gotten
2. I don't really belive in my heart the vows but I wanted to find out what religion was like and maybe experience something that would convince me that religion is something to believe in.
C. Involvement with youth experience.
--Consciousness my main focus now
1. same basic questions as above and must be all encompassing
2. Origin of Consciousness and the Breakdown of the bicameral mind
a. answers ethics, religion, and culture
b.not common sense or what a theory of consciousness would be like.
3. Scientific views are split.
a. Reductionism- Whole understood by sum of parts
1-mainstream - worked well in other sciences
A-Quantum mechanics
B-Molecular Biology
C- Genetics
2-Can explain much of western thought - new theory science
b. What about the east thought
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hardly a Rosette Stone. I think I pretty much said this much .
All I can say is the the Egyptians had a very much more visual system of glyphs that look (I learned to prefer glyphics to any entertainment we get on the tube) was revealed without the blind guide of statistical mechanics but the economic independence could gain say both, the visual and other views, of {two spectrums not Derrida on Marx (spectral color particular) }what was so turned. bUt I do not have to keep saying what I mean. It is not as hard to undertandy what I write as some claim. I use the technology not as a tool but as a machine. Marx never knew but to Hegel I think not.
The psychological profile being taught at CU was not able to collect my coversion TO GOD from rejecting Dawkins's so-called geneic selectionism WHILE IT IS POSSIBLE TO REJECT DAWKINS AND NOT BELIVE IN GOD. That was my choice. This is no excuse for failure of Central NY School to reject Western NY teachers but it was a dispute in the generation before me that sacrificed "the student" for an economic that was to be but was not. I USED my parents $ and my DEDICATION but the combination was not rewardable becasue it spanned in extension what was being retained in intention. At some point ANne I need the space just to expres my self for that is not a pose or poser etc. My generation is already being surpassed but I will outlive my grandparents who gave me the keys to the Crysler so when I say that CU IS NOT able to distinguish a false postitive meme from geneic criticism you claim incomprehension at your own anthropological peril. I am not interested in taking the sentences apart unless there was some goal other than posting tit and that onto tats etc etc FOR IN MY CASE it was never reasonable to hospitalize the college student. Cornell was "looking for" so-called "bench-mark indications" which included "GOD CONTROLS MY THOUGHTS". Yes I was telling people at Cornell this and they locked me down regardless that behind this claim was A MORE PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY OF BIOLOGY than any other at Cornell I ever met. That statement is classed as an illusion and so if you did not read enough of my posts back up, for there is NO PHILOSOPHICAL grasp of creation/evooution discourse without this which ipso facto at CU gets one commited EVEN IF THERE IS NOT SCIENCE behind it and yet in my Case I had been to Princeten Seminary a year or so before discussing Einstein and Religion with TH Torrance who said I was a "prodigy". I learned this at home. Please take note. Philp Johnson is not the last word on this and I know that what Gish denied in his ORIGIN OF LIFE tape *could* be fact but in that case his position would be even stronger.
I did not realize that the academy is but a frat writ large. IT is. I am sorry. I was deluded that towers to the sky could be built. NOt yet at least. The problem here is not a difference between religions as Provine had it and tried to make the myth this way on the Jeovah's Witness. Pascal is no myth. The axiomatic propositionalism has never been really tried in Evolutionary THOUGHT and the extnent that it does it does not reason to motion sensu stricto but already within the combined concepts that operate most of the biological landscape.
This high school outline was before I bought The Selfish Gene from the Science Center in Toronto and on reading this at first rejected the Bicameral Mind hypothesis for Dawkins's genes to memes but then realized that this idea made no sense because GOD could just change the conditons Dawkins invokes. I went with GOd from then on and never looked back into this chaos. There ant no sunshine when she goes this way. All of the doubts were removed in the past 10 yrs and 9-11 makes it just as obvious as this writing is revealing that immaturity in the faith is no excuse to excuse others of salvation. Dont do it. Please.
I found out more than I could have even if I had sold soul devil wanted. All I ever hear on these site any more is the truth and people who wanted to be conviced of the converse that religion is something validiated NOT to believe in. You will never find this side if you dont start with the baby shoes.
You are correct, these are broken sentences but so it became deep down in my heart.
[This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 09-25-2002]
™ Version 4.2
