Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,425 Year: 3,682/9,624 Month: 553/974 Week: 166/276 Day: 6/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Apes are People too !
ohnhai
Member (Idle past 5183 days)
Posts: 649
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2004


Message 1 of 19 (306917)
04-26-2006 10:08 PM


Socialists: Give apes human rights
Spain Herald
The Spanish Socialist Party will introduce a bill in the Congress of Deputies calling for "the immediate inclusion of (simians) in the category of persons, and that they be given the moral and legal protection that currently are only enjoyed by human beings." The PSOE's justification is that humans share 98.4% of our genes with chimpanzees, 97.7% with gorillas, and 96.4% with orangutans.
The party will announce its Great Ape Project at a press conference tomorrow. An organization with the same name is seeking a UN declaration on simian rights which would defend ape interests "the same as those of minors and the mentally handicapped of our species."
According to the Project, "Today only members of the species Homo sapiens are considered part of the community of equals. The chimpanzee, the gorilla, and the orangutan are our species's closest relatives. They possess sufficient mental faculties and emotional life to justify their inclusion in the community of equals."
http://www.spainherald.com/3438.html

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Ben!, posted 04-26-2006 10:57 PM ohnhai has replied
 Message 5 by kalimero, posted 04-28-2006 4:11 PM ohnhai has not replied
 Message 14 by LudoRephaim, posted 04-29-2006 1:51 PM ohnhai has replied
 Message 17 by Omnivorous, posted 04-30-2006 8:29 AM ohnhai has not replied

  
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1420 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 2 of 19 (306921)
04-26-2006 10:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ohnhai
04-26-2006 10:08 PM


AHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
sigh....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ohnhai, posted 04-26-2006 10:08 PM ohnhai has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by ohnhai, posted 04-26-2006 11:14 PM Ben! has not replied

  
ohnhai
Member (Idle past 5183 days)
Posts: 649
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2004


Message 3 of 19 (306922)
04-26-2006 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Ben!
04-26-2006 10:57 PM


Was gonna use the thread title "Enter the Monkey" but that would have been wrong on SOOOOOOO many levels

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Ben!, posted 04-26-2006 10:57 PM Ben! has not replied

  
Chronos
Member (Idle past 6247 days)
Posts: 102
From: Macomb, Mi, USA
Joined: 10-23-2005


Message 4 of 19 (306925)
04-27-2006 12:37 AM


I'm all for ape rights - just as soon as we get everyone in our own species taken care of.

  
kalimero
Member (Idle past 2466 days)
Posts: 251
From: Israel
Joined: 04-08-2006


Message 5 of 19 (307473)
04-28-2006 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ohnhai
04-26-2006 10:08 PM


Whats the difference?
What laws would you apply to all primates, and why?
Some of the laws are just not appicable.
Example: protection in the work-place.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ohnhai, posted 04-26-2006 10:08 PM ohnhai has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Modulous, posted 04-28-2006 5:17 PM kalimero has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 6 of 19 (307503)
04-28-2006 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by kalimero
04-28-2006 4:11 PM


Re: Whats the difference?
What laws would you apply to all primates, and why?
Some of the laws are just not appicable.
Example: protection in the work-place.
Actually it should do. The laws are meant to give the apes the same rights as a minor, so they wouldn't be able to work (or they would within whatever child labour laws exist).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by kalimero, posted 04-28-2006 4:11 PM kalimero has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by kalimero, posted 04-28-2006 8:20 PM Modulous has replied
 Message 9 by ohnhai, posted 04-29-2006 6:15 AM Modulous has replied

  
kalimero
Member (Idle past 2466 days)
Posts: 251
From: Israel
Joined: 04-08-2006


Message 7 of 19 (307566)
04-28-2006 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Modulous
04-28-2006 5:17 PM


Re: Whats the difference?
Actually it should do. The laws are meant to give the apes the same rights as a minor, so they wouldn't be able to work (or they would within whatever child labour laws exist).
ok that explaines it, but can you still if you think all rules should apply? If we are talking about children then how about education? (should we teach all primates about ToE or ID {I'm joking do not respond to the brackets})

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Modulous, posted 04-28-2006 5:17 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Modulous, posted 04-29-2006 5:22 AM kalimero has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 8 of 19 (307671)
04-29-2006 5:22 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by kalimero
04-28-2006 8:20 PM


Re: Whats the difference?
ok that explaines it, but can you still if you think all rules should apply? If we are talking about children then how about education?
Well, right now it seems to be more about defending their interests than integrating them into society. I don't think they will be capable of understanding the law in its entirety (who knows, maybe they'll get the gist though), so we can't ask them to abide by it. We can't send the apes to school since the difference between human kids and apes is that human kids will not always be considered minors.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by kalimero, posted 04-28-2006 8:20 PM kalimero has not replied

  
ohnhai
Member (Idle past 5183 days)
Posts: 649
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2004


Message 9 of 19 (307677)
04-29-2006 6:15 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Modulous
04-28-2006 5:17 PM


Re: Whats the difference?
If an ape in your care (hard not to say pet) became terminally ill would you be allowed to take it to the vet to be ”put down’? or will anti-euthanasia laws prevent that? If not what implications would that have for humans?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Modulous, posted 04-28-2006 5:17 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Modulous, posted 04-29-2006 7:02 AM ohnhai has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 10 of 19 (307679)
04-29-2006 7:02 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by ohnhai
04-29-2006 6:15 AM


Re: Whats the difference?
If an ape in your care (hard not to say pet) became terminally ill would you be allowed to take it to the vet to be ”put down’? or will anti-euthanasia laws prevent that? If not what implications would that have for humans?
Given the wording as I've seen it, euthanasia laws would apply (does the law of that particular country allow the mentally disabled/minors to be euthanatized?).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by ohnhai, posted 04-29-2006 6:15 AM ohnhai has not replied

  
EZscience
Member (Idle past 5175 days)
Posts: 961
From: A wheatfield in Kansas
Joined: 04-14-2005


Message 11 of 19 (307681)
04-29-2006 7:19 AM


Medical testing?
Would this proscribe any medical tests that involve primates?
I am interested to know if there are opponents to this proposition.
Seems there would be substantial human 'costs' involved on a number of levels.

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Modulous, posted 04-29-2006 7:36 AM EZscience has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 12 of 19 (307682)
04-29-2006 7:36 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by EZscience
04-29-2006 7:19 AM


Re: Medical testing?
Would this proscribe any medical tests that involve primates?
I believe so, since they would be minors they wouldn't be able to give informed consent to the tests. More information can be found at their website, here is their declaration. This isn't the Spanish Socialist Party's site, but I believe it shares the same kind of views, and may be the influence for the proposition.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by EZscience, posted 04-29-2006 7:19 AM EZscience has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by EZscience, posted 04-29-2006 7:54 AM Modulous has not replied

  
EZscience
Member (Idle past 5175 days)
Posts: 961
From: A wheatfield in Kansas
Joined: 04-14-2005


Message 13 of 19 (307684)
04-29-2006 7:54 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Modulous
04-29-2006 7:36 AM


I guess my gut instinct is to agree with them.
I am no tree-hugger and I put the interests of humans before other animals, but it is difficult to challenge their arguments on a biological level.
Evolution tells us there is really nothing special about humans (except our excessive reverence for our own species) and all evidence suggests these animals have high intelligence and are capable of a great deal of sensitivity, emotion, empathy, etc.
Also, wouldn't that make harming a great ape punishable at the same level as harming a human? I see some major legal issues arising here.
Again, I am curious about those who would oppose this proposition and what sort of reasoning they might use to justify their opposition (scientific, religious, political).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Modulous, posted 04-29-2006 7:36 AM Modulous has not replied

  
LudoRephaim
Member (Idle past 5105 days)
Posts: 651
From: Jareth's labyrinth
Joined: 03-12-2006


Message 14 of 19 (307727)
04-29-2006 1:51 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ohnhai
04-26-2006 10:08 PM


ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!
That was Hilarious.
I dont agree with Chimps having the same rights as humans or being recognized as humans. For one, Chimps, Gorilla and orangutans would find it insulting to be called humans LOL. Number two, we have enough knuckle walkers in the human race right now! We dont need anymore LOL.

"The Nephilim where in the Earth in those days..." Genesis 6:4

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ohnhai, posted 04-26-2006 10:08 PM ohnhai has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by ohnhai, posted 04-29-2006 8:23 PM LudoRephaim has replied

  
ohnhai
Member (Idle past 5183 days)
Posts: 649
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2004


Message 15 of 19 (307809)
04-29-2006 8:23 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by LudoRephaim
04-29-2006 1:51 PM


Just because Man and Woman have the same rights, doesn’t mean that Man is recognised as Woman or that Woman is recognised as Man. In the same frame giving the great Apes the same rights as a human, (albeit a minor) doesn’t not recognise them AS human. All is it does is recognise that, as some level, they deserve a similar level of rights and protection.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by LudoRephaim, posted 04-29-2006 1:51 PM LudoRephaim has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by EZscience, posted 04-29-2006 10:25 PM ohnhai has not replied
 Message 18 by LudoRephaim, posted 05-01-2006 2:03 PM ohnhai has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024