Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ] EvC Forum active members: 107 ( 8805 total)
Current session began: Page Loaded: 12-12-2017 2:39 PM
353 online now:
Chat room empty
Newest Member: jaufre
Year: 28,659/ 21,208
Month: 725/ 1,847
Week: 100/ 475
Day: 10/ 37
Hour: 0/ 0
Originated: 02-21-2009 11:13 PM
Total Participants: 4
Total Posts: 4 Summation Mode: Off
Topic: Why Darwin?
Message 1 of 4 (500012)
02-21-2009 11:13 PM
I thought part of the EvC mission was to serve as a place for equal debate between Evolutionism and Creationism; so why is the site's browser icon a picture of Darwin? It kind of sends the message that the site is not too serious about equality and neutrality.
You've been Gremled!
Replies to this message: Message 2 by Admin, posted 02-22-2009 8:10 AM Jon has not yet responded
From: EvC Forum
Member Rating: 2.0
Message 2 of 4 (500027)
02-22-2009 8:10 AM
Message 1 by Jon 02-21-2009 11:13 PM
Good question, with a very simple answer.
I tried a couple different arks.
I tried a couple different Bibles.
I tried a couple different Darwins.
I tried a couple different ornate E's for EvC Forum.
Only that specific Darwin was recognizable at the very tiny size.
If someone can point me to an image that is appropriate and available and recognizable at a very tiny size, I'll use it.
In the meantime, I'll change it over to one of the very ornate E's. May take a while to show up in your browser.
-- Percy EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to: Message 1 by Jon, posted 02-21-2009 11:13 PM Jon has not yet responded
Replies to this message: Message 3 by bluescat48, posted 02-22-2009 8:15 AM Admin has not yet responded
Member (Idle past 1801 days)
From: United States
Message 3 of 4 (500028)
02-22-2009 8:15 AM
Message 2 by Admin 02-22-2009 8:10 AM
If one can recognize the the icon is Darwin, he must have extremely good eyesight. There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to: Message 2 by Admin, posted 02-22-2009 8:10 AM Admin has not yet responded
Suspended Junior Member (Idle past 1779 days)
From: New York
Message 4 of 4 (677479)
10-30-2012 5:30 AM
I like your view much, go ahead.i support you!
obd2 scan tool| Car Mechanical Equipment| car key blank importers
Edited by Admin, : Despam.
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to: Board Administration
The Public Record
Proposed New Topics
Suggestions and Questions
The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy
Big Bang and Cosmology
Dates and Dating
Education and Creation/Evolution
Geology and the Great Flood
Human Origins and Evolution
Is It Science?
Origin of Life
Social and Religious Issues
Social Issues and Creation/Evolution
Faith and Belief
Theological Creationism and ID
The Great Debate
Free For All
Post of the Month
Links and Information
Creation/Evolution In The News
The Book Nook
Practice Makes Perfect
Topic Proposals Archive
Short Subjects (No new topics or messages)
Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.0 Beta Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017