Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 88 (8846 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-21-2018 4:55 PM
249 online now:
AnswersInGenitals, Dr Adequate, PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat), Tangle (5 members, 244 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: MrTim
Upcoming Birthdays: anglagard
Post Volume:
Total: 835,460 Year: 10,283/29,783 Month: 947/1,583 Week: 416/291 Day: 65/59 Hour: 1/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Is body hair a functionless vestige?
Ken Fabos
Member (Idle past 89 days)
Posts: 51
From: Australia
Joined: 05-09-2010

Message 1 of 2 (559449)
05-09-2010 6:41 PM

It seems to be widely held that human body hair, being too thin to provide thermal insulation, is essentially functionless. It's my contention that it's probably multifunctional and that it's primary function is sensory. It may still have a role in thermal regulation for those who retain a lot of it and may have a role in carrying pheremones, perspiration as well as water away from the skin - with some impact on how well perspiration cools - however I want to focus specifically on hair's sensory function. I believe it's widely overlooked and I'm interested in how so many people, who live constantly with the sensory input these humble mechano-receptors provide, can fail to consider that function relevant to discussions on the evolution that led to our current (relative and variable) state of sparse hair cover, rather than fur covered, skin.
Member (Idle past 2473 days)
Posts: 113
Joined: 03-28-2010

Message 2 of 2 (559483)
05-09-2010 10:29 PM

Thread Copied to Human Origins and Evolution Forum
Thread copied to the Is body hair a functionless vestige? thread in the Human Origins and Evolution forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2018