Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8872 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 11-18-2018 11:49 AM
181 online now:
Coragyps, edge, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Stile, Tangle (6 members, 175 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Son of Man
Post Volume:
Total: 842,231 Year: 17,054/29,783 Month: 1,042/1,956 Week: 39/506 Day: 39/89 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On the origin of life
Lomu
Member (Idle past 274 days)
Posts: 11
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 12-11-2004


Message 1 of 4 (789958)
08-22-2016 9:00 PM


Howdy all.

Got a slightly tricky one here. I've been asked to explain "the origin of life" by a member of a discussion forum (not from here) and the article that's been posted in support of the Intelligent creation of life is this link here.

http://creation.com/origin-of-life

I have my own views, being a scientists of course- but others may have theirs. What flaws might be found in that article?


Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminPhat, posted 08-22-2016 9:34 PM Lomu has responded

  
AdminPhat
Administrator
Posts: 1886
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-03-2004


Message 2 of 4 (789961)
08-22-2016 9:34 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Lomu
08-22-2016 9:00 PM


Which Way To Go?
Welcome to EvC, Lomu. I read through the article and saw that it indeed did support the Theistic view of creation.
quote:
Conclusion

Life did not arise by physics and chemistry without intelligence. The intelligence needed to create life, even the simplest life, is far greater than that of humans; we are still scratching around trying to understand fully how the simplest life forms work. There is much yet to be learned of even the simplest bacterium. Indeed, as we learn more the ‘problem’ of the origin of life gets more difficult; a solution does not get nearer, it gets further away. But the real problem is this: the origin of life screams at us that there is a super-intelligent Creator of life and that is just not acceptable to the secular mind of today.

The origin of life is about as good as it gets in terms of scientific ‘proof’ for the existence of God.



You say you are a scientist and have your own views and beliefs so my question to you is which forum you wish to discuss this in and under which context?
Is your view more akin to science or to faith?

Edited by AdminPhat, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Lomu, posted 08-22-2016 9:00 PM Lomu has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Lomu, posted 08-22-2016 11:14 PM AdminPhat has not yet responded

  
Lomu
Member (Idle past 274 days)
Posts: 11
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 12-11-2004


Message 3 of 4 (789966)
08-22-2016 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminPhat
08-22-2016 9:34 PM


Re: Which Way To Go?
Howdy AdminPhat,

I'm definitely on the side of a naturalistic view of the creation of life; I don't feel that any supernatural intervention is required to explain the origins of life on Earth. Obviously, others may have a different view.

"Origins of Life" perhaps?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminPhat, posted 08-22-2016 9:34 PM AdminPhat has not yet responded

  
Adminnemooseus
Director
Posts: 3869
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 4 of 4 (789972)
08-23-2016 12:01 AM


Thread Copied to Origin of Life Forum
Thread copied to the On the origin of life thread in the Origin of Life forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2018